Cefiderocol Treatment for Patients with Multidrug- and Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections in the Compassionate Use Program.

Cefiderocol is an option for infections caused by multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, but its in vitro activity against these isolates and its clinical effectiveness for isolates with MICs of >1 µg/mL is unclear. We investigated the in vitro activity of cefiderocol against P. aeruginosa isolates collected from patients treated with cefiderocol through the compassionate use program and assessed physician-reported clinical response and 28-day all-cause mortality by cefiderocol MIC values. P. aeruginosa isolates underwent susceptibility testing to cefiderocol and comparator agents by using reference broth microdilution. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA; susceptible, ≤1 µg/mL) and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI; susceptible, ≤4 µg/mL) cefiderocol breakpoints were applied. Additionally, molecular characterization of ß-lactamase genes was performed. Clinical response and vital status were reported by treating physicians. Forty-six patients with P. aeruginosa infections were evaluated. Twenty-nine (63%) and 42 (91%) isolates were susceptible to cefiderocol using FDA and CLSI breakpoints, respectively. Thirty-seven (80%) and 32 (70%) isolates were not susceptible to ceftolozane-tazobactam and ceftazidime-avibactam, respectively. The clinical response rate was 69% (20/29) with a cefiderocol MIC of ≤1 µg/mL, 69% (9/13) with a cefiderocol MIC of 2 to 4 µg/mL, and 100% (4/4) with an MIC of ≥8 µg/mL, while day 28 all-cause mortality rates were 23% (6/26; MIC ≤ 1 µg/mL), 33% (4/12; MIC, 2 to 4 µg/mL), and 0% (0/4; MIC ≥8 µg/mL), respectively. Cefiderocol was active in vitro against most P. aeruginosa isolated from patients with limited or no alternative therapies. Patients with cefiderocol MICs of 2 to 4 µg/mL did not have significantly worse outcomes than those with MICs of ≤1 µg/mL.

Cefiderocol For Injection: Compatibility Testing Using the MINI-BAG Plus Container System and the VIAL-MATE Adaptor.

Background: Cost-effective and convenient modalities are required to facilitate the administration of antibiotics in hospital and outpatient settings. Objective: This study investigated the physical compatibility of the MINI-BAG Plus Container System and VIAL-MATE Adaptor with the 1 g drug product vials used for cefiderocol. Methods: Qualitative testing of the MINI-BAG Plus Container System (50 and 100 mL of 5% dextrose injection or 0.9% sodium chloride injection), using empty vials and vials containing lyophilized cefiderocol powder, was conducted in triplicate on MINI-BAGs that were hung and observed over 3 hours. Connection security between empty vials and the VIAL-MATE Adaptor was assessed in triplicate. Results: All predefined physical compatibility criteria between cefiderocol 1 g vials and the MINI-BAG Plus Container System were met, including a secure connection, successful multiple transfers of solution between vial and bag, successful reconstitution of cefiderocol, and lack of leaking into the vial or from the connections. There was no particulate matter in the prepared solution and no precipitation or discoloration. Secure connections between the VIAL-MATE Adaptor and cefiderocol vials were demonstrated. Conclusion and Relevance: Use of these systems is relevant even where resources are limited and may increase the efficiency of cefiderocol administration in hospitals, outpatient settings, or long-term healthcare facilities.

Heteroresistance to cefiderocol in carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in the CREDIBLE-CR study was not linked to clinical outcomes: a post hoc analysis.

IMPORTANCE: The population analysis profiling (PAP) test is considered the "gold standard" method to detect heteroresistance. It exposes bacteria to increasing concentrations of antibiotics at high cell densities to detect any minority resistant subpopulations that might be missed by the low inoculums used for reference susceptibility tests. However, its clinical relevance has not been well established. In the CREDIBLE-CR study, a numerically increased all-cause mortality was observed in the cefiderocol arm relative to the best available therapy arm for patients with Acinetobacter spp. infections. Heteroresistance has independently been proposed by another research group as a potential explanation of the mortality difference. An analysis of the baseline carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-baumannii complex isolates from patients treated with cefiderocol in the CREDIBLE-CR study showed the highest clinical cure rate and the lowest mortality for patients with PAP-heteroresistant isolates compared with PAP-susceptible or PAP-resistant isolates. These findings contradict the abovementioned hypothesis that heteroresistance contributed to the increased mortality.

Antibacterial Drug Development: A New Approach Is Needed for the Field to Survive and Thrive.

It is often said that the marketplace for new antibiotics is broken. This notion is supported by the observation that many recently-approved antibiotics to treat drug-resistant bacteria have failed commercially in a spectacular fashion. Today, companies with peak market-cap values in excess of USD 500 million to 1 billion prior to product launch regularly sell for pennies on the dollar a few years after market introduction. It is possible, however, that the market is not as broken as we perceive. That is, in the collective mind of the clinician, recently-approved antibiotics may be too-poorly differentiated to justify their broad use and inordinate cost relative to those already existing. Perhaps we in the antibacterial drug development field must change our way of thinking if we are to survive and thrive. Rather than reflexively developing new ß-lactam-ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations for every new enzyme that evades our current inhibitors, we should focus discovery and development efforts on agents that revolutionize how we potentiate antibiotics. To this end, there has been renewed interest in phage therapies, virulence inhibitors, bacterial growth rate modulators, monoclonal antibodies, and other approaches to augment antibiotic effects. Herein, we suggest that the unmet medical need is less about adding poorly-differentiated antibiotics to our armamentarium and more about the need for innovation in how we augment antibiotic regimen effects.

Tigecycline: a novel broad-spectrum antimicrobial.

OBJECTIVE: To review the literature on tigecycline, a novel antibiotic. DATA SOURCES: References were identified through MEDLINE (1966-February 2007) and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-February 2007) databases, using the key words tigecycline, glycylcycline, complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSI), complicated intraabdominal infections (cIAI), and in vitro. Additional articles for this review were identified by reviewing the bibliographies of articles cited. The package insert was also used as a reference. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: In vitro, clinical, and pharmacokinetic studies evaluating tigecycline's safety and efficacy were selected. DATA SYNTHESIS: A tigecycline 100 mg intravenous loading dose followed by an intravenous infusion of 50 mg every 12 hours was shown in clinical trials to be as effective as comparator antibiotics in treating cSSSI and cIAI. Tigecycline has a broad spectrum of activity that includes many resistant bacteria with few treatment options, such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing bacteria such as Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. In cSSSI studies, tigecycline was found to be noninferior to vancomycin plus aztreonam with test-of-cure rates of 86.5% and 88.6%, respectively. Tigecycline was also found to be noninferior to imipenem/cilastatin in cIAI studies; clinical cure rates were 86.1% and 86.2%, respectively. In vitro activity has been demonstrated against other multidrug-resistant microorganisms of concern, such as Acinetobacter spp. Although it has a broad spectrum of activity, tigecycline has inadequate activity against Pseudomonas spp. Nausea and vomiting were the most frequently reported adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Tigecycline is approved for the treatment of cSSSI and cIAI infections. To date, little resistance to tigecycline has been reported; however, with widespread use of the drug, resistance will likely occur. Since published studies have not dealt with seriously ill patients, it is recommended that, until further studies have been completed, other agents be used in the treatment of these patients unless no option other than tigecycline exists.