Modeling Patient-Informed Liver Contrast Perfusion in Contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the correlation between patient attributes and contrast enhancement in liver parenchyma and demonstrate the potential for patient-informed prediction and optimization of contrast enhancement in liver imaging. METHODS: The study included 418 chest/abdomen/pelvis computed tomography scans, with 75% to 25% training-testing split. Two regression models were built to predict liver parenchyma contrast enhancement over time: first model (model A) utilized patient attributes (height, weight, sex, age, bolus volume, injection rate, scan times, body mass index, lean body mass) and bolus-tracking data. A second model (model B) only used the patient attributes. Pearson coefficient was used to assess predictive accuracy. RESULTS: Weight- and height-related features were found to be statistically significant predictors (P < 0.05), weight being the strongest. Of the 2 models, model A (r = 0.75) showed greater accuracy than model B (r = 0.42). CONCLUSIONS: Patient attributes can be used to build prediction model for liver parenchyma contrast enhancement. The model can have utility in optimization and improved consistency in contrast-enhanced liver imaging.

Expanding the Concept of Diagnostic Reference Levels to Noise and Dose Reference Levels in CT.

OBJECTIVE. Diagnostic reference levels were developed as guidance for radiation dose in medical imaging and, by inference, diagnostic quality. The objective of this work was to expand the concept of diagnostic reference levels to explicitly include noise of CT examinations to simultaneously target both dose and quality through corresponding reference values. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The study consisted of 2851 adult CT examinations performed with scanners from two manufacturers and two clinical protocols: abdominopelvic CT with IV contrast administration and chest CT without IV contrast administration. An institutional informatics system was used to automatically extract protocol type, patient diameter, volume CT dose index, and noise magnitude from images. The data were divided into five reference patient size ranges. Noise reference level, noise reference range, dose reference level, and dose reference range were defined for each size range. RESULTS. The data exhibited strong dependence between dose and patient size, weak dependence between noise and patient size, and different trends for different manufacturers with differing strategies for tube current modulation. The results suggest size-based reference intervals and levels for noise and dose (e.g., noise reference level and noise reference range of 11.5-12.9 HU and 11.0-14.0 HU for chest CT and 10.1-12.1 HU and 9.4-13.7 HU for abdominopelvic CT examinations) that can be targeted to improve clinical performance consistency. CONCLUSION. New reference levels and ranges, which simultaneously consider image noise and radiation dose information across wide patient populations, were defined and determined for two clinical protocols. The methods of new quantitative constraints may provide unique and useful information about the goal of managing the variability of image quality and dose in clinical CT examinations.

Variability in image quality and radiation dose within and across 97 medical facilities.

Purpose: To characterize variability in image quality and radiation dose across a large cohort of computed tomography (CT) examinations and identify the scan factors with the highest influence on the observed variabilities. Approach: This retrospective institutional-review-board-exempt investigation was performed on 87,629 chest and abdomen-pelvis CT scans acquired for 97 facilities from 2018 to 2019. Images were assessed in terms of noise, resolution, and dose metrics (global noise, frequency in which modulation transfer function is at 0.50, and volumetric CT dose index, respectively). The results were fit to linear mixed-effects models to quantify the variabilities as affected by scan parameters and settings and patient characteristics. A list of factors, ranked by t -value with p < 0.05 , was ascertained for each of the six mixed effects models. A type III p -value test was used to assess the influence of facility. Results: Across different facilities, image quality and dose were significantly different ( p < 0.05 ), with little correlation between their mean magnitudes and consistency (Pearson's correlation coefficient < 0.34 ). Scanner model, slice thickness, recon field-of-view and kernel, mAs, kVp, patient size, and centering were the most influential factors. The two body regions exhibited similar rankings of these factors for noise (Spearman's correlation coefficient = 0.76 ) and dose (Spearman's correlation coefficient = 0.86 ) but not for resolution (Spearman's correlation coefficient = 0.52 ). Conclusions: Clinical CT scans can vary in image quality and dose with broad implications for diagnostic utility and radiation burden. Average scan quality was not correlated with interpatient scan-quality consistency. For a given facility, this variability can be quite large, with magnitude differences across facilities. The knowledge of the most influential factors per body region may be used to better manage these variabilities within and across facilities.

Influence of background lung characteristics on nodule detection with computed tomography.

We sought to characterize local lung complexity in chest computed tomography (CT) and to characterize its impact on the detectability of pulmonary nodules. Forty volumetric chest CT scans were created by embedding between three and five simulated 5-mm lung nodules into one of three volumetric chest CT datasets. Thirteen radiologists evaluated 157 nodules, resulting in 2041 detection opportunities. Analyzing the substrate CT data prior to nodule insertion, 14 image features were measured within a region around each nodule location. A generalized linear mixed-effects statistical model was fit to the data to verify the contribution of each metric on detectability. The model was tuned for simplicity, interpretability, and generalizability using stepwise regression applied to the primary features and their interactions. We found that variables corresponding to each of five categories (local structural distractors, local intensity, global context, local vascularity, and contiguity with structural distractors) were significant ( p < 0.01 ) factors in a standardized model. Moreover, reader-specific models conveyed significant differences among readers with significant distraction (missed detections) influenced by local intensity- versus local-structural characteristics being mutually exclusive. Readers with significant local intensity distraction ( n = 10 ) detected substantially fewer lung nodules than those who were significantly distracted by local structure ( n = 2 ), 46.1% versus 65.3% mean nodules detected, respectively.