Early Estimates of Updated 2023-2024 (Monovalent XBB.1.5) COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness Against Symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection Attributable to Co-Circulating Omicron Variants Among Immunocompetent Adults - Increasing Community Access to Testing Program, United States, September 2023-January 2024.

On September 12, 2023, CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommended updated 2023-2024 (updated) COVID-19 vaccination with a monovalent XBB.1.5-derived vaccine for all persons aged ≥6 months to prevent COVID-19, including severe disease. During fall 2023, XBB lineages co-circulated with JN.1, an Omicron BA.2.86 lineage that emerged in September 2023. These variants have amino acid substitutions that might increase escape from neutralizing antibodies. XBB lineages predominated through December 2023, when JN.1 became predominant in the United States. Reduction or failure of spike gene (S-gene) amplification (i.e., S-gene target failure [SGTF]) in real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction testing is a time-dependent, proxy indicator of JN.1 infection. Data from the Increasing Community Access to Testing SARS-CoV-2 pharmacy testing program were analyzed to estimate updated COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE) (i.e., receipt versus no receipt of updated vaccination) against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, including by SGTF result. Among 9,222 total eligible tests, overall VE among adults aged ≥18 years was 54% (95% CI = 46%-60%) at a median of 52 days after vaccination. Among 2,199 tests performed at a laboratory with SGTF testing, VE 60-119 days after vaccination was 49% (95% CI = 19%-68%) among tests exhibiting SGTF and 60% (95% CI = 35%-75%) among tests without SGTF. Updated COVID-19 vaccines provide protection against symptomatic infection, including against currently circulating lineages. CDC will continue monitoring VE, including for expected waning and against severe disease. All persons aged ≥6 months should receive an updated COVID-19 vaccine dose.

Risk evaluation and mitigation strategy compliance for pulmonary hypertension medications after policy implementation with computerized provider order entry support.

DISCLAIMER: In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. PURPOSE: Treatment for pulmonary hypertension includes medications with risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (REMS) programs. Health-system inpatient pharmacies dispensing these agents must comply with inpatient REMS dispensing criteria. Implementing a health-system policy with computerized provider order entry (CPOE) decision support may improve REMS compliance. METHODS: This was a retrospective, quasi-experimental study comparing REMS compliance before and after development of a policy with CPOE decision support that was implemented in August 2019. Patients 18 years of age or older with a diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension were included if they received at least one dose of an endothelin receptor antagonist or riociguat while hospitalized. Patients were included in the preintervention group if they were hospitalized between August 1, 2017, and August 31, 2019, and in the postintervention group if they were hospitalized between September 1, 2019, and August 31, 2021. The primary outcome was the REMS compliance rate. Secondary endpoints included the time to REMS compliance and independent factors associated with failed or delayed REMS compliance. RESULTS: A total of 150 patients were included, with 75 patients in both the pre- and postintervention groups. Compliance increased significantly from the preintervention (50%) to postintervention (92%) group (P < 0.001). Time to compliance was also significantly reduced from 770 minutes in the preintervention group to 140 minutes in the postintervention group (P = 0.031). Factors independently associated with REMS compliance were being in the postintervention group (odds ratio, 16.9; 95% confidence interval, 5.8-49.2) and being admitted to a pulmonary hypertension center for comprehensive care. (odds ratio, 7.8; 95% confidence interval, 2.9-21.2). CONCLUSION: A health-system policy with CPOE decision support improved both the rate of and time to compliance with inpatient REMS dispensing procedures.

Critical care pharmacist perspectives on optimal practice models and prioritization of professional activities: A cross-sectional survey.

DISCLAIMER: In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. PURPOSE: Critical care pharmacists (CCPs) are essential members of the multidisciplinary critical care team. Professional activities of the CCP are outlined in a 2020 position paper on critical care pharmacy services. This study looks to characterize CCP perspectives for priorities in optimizing pharmacy practice models and professional activities. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional survey conducted from July 24 to September 20, 2023. A 41-question survey instrument was developed to assess 7 domains: demographics, CCP resource utilization, patient care, quality improvement, research and scholarship, training and education, and professional development. This voluntary survey was sent to members of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy's Critical Care Practice and Research Network. The survey was open for a total of 6 weeks. RESULTS: There was a response rate of 20.7% (332 of 1,605 invitees), with 66.6% of respondents (n = 221) completing at least 90% of the survey questions. Most respondents were clinical specialists (58.2%) and/or practiced at an academic medical center (58.5%). Direct patient care, quality improvement and medication safety, and teaching and precepting were identified as the CCP activities of highest importance to CCPs. The CCP-to-patient ratios considered ideal were 1:11-15 (selected by 49.8% of respondents) and 1:16-20 (33.9% of respondents). The ideal percentage of time dedicated to direct patient care activities, as identified by survey respondents, was 50% (interquartile range, 40-50). CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the professional activities viewed as having the highest priority by CCPs. Future research is needed to define optimal CCP practice models for the delivery of patient care in real-world settings.

Glutathione synthesis in the mouse liver supports lipid abundance through NRF2 repression.

Cells rely on antioxidants to survive. The most abundant antioxidant is glutathione (GSH). The synthesis of GSH is non-redundantly controlled by the glutamate-cysteine ligase catalytic subunit (GCLC). GSH imbalance is implicated in many diseases, but the requirement for GSH in adult tissues is unclear. To interrogate this, we have developed a series of in vivo models to induce Gclc deletion in adult animals. We find that GSH is essential to lipid abundance in vivo. GSH levels are highest in liver tissue, which is also a hub for lipid production. While the loss of GSH does not cause liver failure, it decreases lipogenic enzyme expression, circulating triglyceride levels, and fat stores. Mechanistically, we find that GSH promotes lipid abundance by repressing NRF2, a transcription factor induced by oxidative stress. These studies identify GSH as a fulcrum in the liver's balance of redox buffering and triglyceride production.