Prevalence and associated risk factors of drug-resistant tuberculosis in Thailand: results from the fifth national anti-tuberculosis drug resistance survey.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence and risk factors of drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB), the fifth national anti-TB drug resistance survey was conducted in Thailand. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted by stratified cluster sampling with probability proportional to size of TB cases from public health facilities in 100 clusters throughout Thailand from August 2017 to August 2018. Susceptibility testing of TB isolates to first- and second-line anti-TB drugs was performed on Löwenstein-Jensen medium using the indirect proportion method. Multiple imputation was done for handling missing data using Stata 16. The proportion of TB cases with drug resistance was determined. The odds ratio was used to evaluate risk factors associated with drug-resistant TB. RESULTS: Among 1501 new TB and 69 previously treated TB cases, 14.0% [95% confidence interval (CI): 12.1-16.1] and 33.4% (95% CI: 23.6-44.8), respectively, had resistance to any anti-TB drug. Multidrug-resistant TB accounted for 0.8% (95% CI: 0.5-1.4) of new TB cases and 13.0% (95% CI: 6.5-24.4) of previously treated TB cases. Drug-resistant TB was associated with prior TB treatment [odds ratio (OR), 2.9; 95% CI: 1.6-5.0], age at 45-54 years (OR, 1.6; 95% CI: 1.0-2.4), male (OR, 1.5; 95% CI: 1.0-2.1) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection (OR, 1.6; 95% CI: 1.0-2.4). CONCLUSIONS: The burden of drug-resistant TB remains high in Thailand. Intensified prevention and control measures should be implemented to reduce the risks of drug-resistant TB in high-risk groups previously treated, especially individuals of late middle age, males and those with coinfection of TB and HIV.

Diagnostic performance of whole-genome sequencing for identifying drug-resistant TB in Thailand.

BACKGROUND: Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is a promising tool for the detection of drug-resistant TB (DR-TB). To date, there have been few comparisons of diagnostic performance of WGS and phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST) in DR-TB.METHODS: We compared drug resistance-conferring mutations identified by WGS analysis using TB-Profiler and Mykrobe with phenotypic DST profiles based on the Löwenstein-Jensen proportion method using drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis (n = 537) isolates from across Thailand. Based on available phenotypic DST results, diagnostic performance was analysed for resistance against isoniazid, rifampicin, ethambutol (EMB), streptomycin, ethionamide (ETH), kanamycin, capreomycin (CPM), para-aminosalicylic acid, ofloxacin and levofloxacin.RESULTS: High agreement between the two methods was observed for most drugs (>91%), except EMB (57%, 95% CI 53-61) and ETH (70%, 95% CI 66-74). Also, low specificity was observed for EMB (49%, 95% CI 44-54) and ETH (66%, 95% CI 61-71). Sensitivity was high for most drugs (range 83-98%), except CPM (77%, 95% CI 59-88).CONCLUSION: Low agreement between WGS and phenotypic tests for drug resistance was found for EMB and ETH. The current genomic database is insufficient for the identification of CPM resistance. Challenges remain for routine usage of WGS-based DST, especially for second-line anti-TB drugs.

Restriction fragment length polymorphism study of nationwide samples of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Thailand, 1997-1998.

SETTING: During 1997-1998, a national anti-tuberculosis drug resistance survey was conducted in Thailand as a part of a global project. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the IS6110 hybridisation patterns and the level of clustering, which was expected to be low due to the short duration of the sample collection. DESIGN: Eight hundred and twenty-eight bacterial isolates were available for fingerprinting by standard IS6110 hybridisation. RESULTS: The restriction fragment length polymorphism patterns varied with geographic locations, ages of the patients, and resistance to rifampicin and streptomycin. The Beijing strain was more common among younger patients, and their prevalence appeared to decrease with the distance from Bangkok, while the opposite was true for the single-banded isolates. Excluding isolates containing five or less copies of IS6110, 26.4% were clustered. Clustering was more common among females. The clustered isolates were sometimes from different provinces and, if resistant to drugs, usually possessed different resistance profiles. CONCLUSIONS: The results question the validity of inferring recent transmission from the clustering of IS6110 hybridisation patterns in some settings in Thailand. The level of recent transmission in a nationwide study in a country with a high incidence of tuberculosis should be evaluated with caution.