Feasibility of Collecting Saliva for Biological Verification of Tobacco Use Status in Dental Practices and Patients' Homes: Results from the National Dental PBRN.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of collecting and analyzing saliva samples from dental practices and patients' homes for biochemical verification of tobacco use status. BASIC RESEARCH DESIGN: Sub-study within single-arm, multi-center, longitudinal clinical study. CLINICAL SETTING: Dental practices in the South Central region of the United States National Dental Practice-Based Research Network and patients' homes. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-five patients recruited from 30 dental practices. INTERVENTIONS: Participants in the sub-study were instructed on saliva collection for cotinine analysis in dental practices where they enrolled in the primary study. Saliva was collected at the practices and then from patients' homes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Feasibility for dental practice collection was define as 80% of enrolled participants having analyzable samples. For patients' home collection, feasibility was defined as 70%. RESULTS: Forty-seven samples (i.e., 86% of those enrolled) collected in dental practices were analyzable. Twenty-one samples (i.e. 38% of those enrolled) collected in patients' homes were analyzable. CONCLUSIONS: Collecting saliva samples for cotinine analysis from dental practices, but not from patients' homes, was feasible. Dental practices may provide an advantageous setting for biochemically verifying tobacco use status as part of clinical trials for tobacco cessation.

Sensitivity to the effects of sedative-hypnotics on motor performance: influence of task difficulty and chronic phenobarbital administration.

The present investigation examined sensitivity to the effects of various sedative-hypnotics on motor performance in rats treated chronically with phenobarbital. Eight rats were trained to walk on a rotorod treadmill at low (8 r.p.m.) and high (24 r.p.m.) rotational speeds. Prior to the chronic regimen, phenobarbital, pentobarbital, amobarbital, diazepam and clonazepam produced dose-dependent impairments in motor performance at both speeds. During chronic treatment with phenobarbital (100 mg/kg/day), tolerance was conferred to the effects of all the drugs examined, as evidenced by rightward shifts in their dose-effect curves. For all drugs, the magnitude of this tolerance was generally consistent across the two speeds. Following a 6-week washout period, during which no drugs were administered, dose-effect curves for each drug shifted back toward their original (i.e. pre-chronic) positions. Under all conditions, the doses required for each drug to impair motor performance at the low speed were higher than those required to impair motor performance at the high speed. These data suggest that sensitivity to the motor-impairing effects of sedative-hypnotics is influenced by the difficulty of the behavioral task, but that task difficulty does not modulate the maximal extent to which tolerance and cross-tolerance are expressed.