Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Publication year range
1.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; : 10781552231198779, 2023 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37654248

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Proteinuria is a well-known toxicity of bevacizumab which can lead to kidney injury or nephrotic syndrome. There is little guidance on the frequency of monitoring and management of those that experience bevacizumab-induced proteinuria. Previous literature has suggested routine monitoring with every dose has limited clinical significance. Currently, there is no standardization of proteinuria monitoring at OhioHealth. METHODS: This retrospective descriptive study included 100 adult patients who received at least 3 doses of a bevacizumab product for a malignant condition at any OhioHealth facility from April 15, 2022 to October 15, 2022. The primary outcome was to describe the average number of proteinuria tests ordered over the course of therapy. RESULTS: Of the 100 patients evaluated, 91 received proteinuria monitoring during treatment with bevacizumab. The overall average number of tests completed per patient per month based on treatment period of bevacizumab was 1.51. Twenty-two of 91 patients (24%) developed grade 2+ proteinuria. Average time to first grade 2+ proteinuria event was 5.7 months. A history of baseline renal dysfunction or chronic kidney disease was the only predefined factor found to be significantly associated with developing grade 2+ proteinuria. The most common treatment modification following a grade 2+ proteinuria result was a delay in therapy. CONCLUSION: Proteinuria monitoring may not be necessary for short definitive courses of bevacizumab and closer monitoring should be considered in patients with baseline renal dysfunction or CKD. Future direction includes evaluating the cost of varying proteinuria tests and developing a recommendation for OhioHealth to standardize testing.

2.
J Pharm Technol ; 38(2): 119-126, 2022 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35571347

RESUMEN

Objective: The purpose of this review is to discuss the existing literature regarding patients who have experienced seizures after administration of a bone density conservation agent (BDCA). Data Sources: A comprehensive literature review was performed between September and October 2021 using the following keywords: osteoporosis/drug therapy, seizures/chemically induced, hypercalcemia, hypocalcemia, osteoporosis, seizure risk, osteoclast medication, seizures, bisphosphonates, risedronate, zoledronic acid, pamidronate, denosumab, Prolia, Xgeva, calcitonin, BDCAs. Study Selection and Data Extraction: A total of 90 articles were identified, but only 6 articles met prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria. These articles included 4 case reports, 1 case series, and 1 retrospective cohort study. Data Synthesis: Two case reports and 1 case series described the occurrence of seizures with the use of zoledronic acid. One case report described the occurrence of seizures with the use of alendronate, 1 retrospective cohort study with the use of denosumab, and 1 case report with the use of calcitonin. The articles displayed a variety of contributing factors that could have caused seizures including those with a prior history of seizures, calcium or vitamin D deficiency prior to starting therapy, a history of gastrectomy impairing glucose homeostasis, or concurrent infection. Conclusion: While there is not a direct link to BDCA causing seizures, the hypocalcemic effect may be severe enough in some patients to precipitate a seizure. The correction of underlying conditions and electrolyte disturbances should be addressed before initiating a BDCA. Further studies are needed to better explore the relationship between BDCA and seizures.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda