Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 29
Filtrar
1.
Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract ; 20(3): 204-8, 2016 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27359333

RESUMEN

In recent years, many assessment and care units for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) have been set up in order to detect, diagnose and to properly manage this complex disorder, but there is no consensus regarding the key functions that these units should perform. The International College of Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (ICOCS) together with the Obsessive Compulsive and Related Disorders Network (OCRN) of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology (ECNP) and the Anxiety and Obsessive Compulsive Disorders Section of the World Psychiaric Association (WPA) has developed a standards of care programme for OCD centres. The goals of this collaborative initiative are promoting basic standards, improving the quality of clinical care and enhance the validity and reliability of research results provided by different facilities and countries.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo/terapia , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Nivel de Atención/normas , Centros de Atención Terciaria/normas , Adulto , Niño , Humanos
2.
J Health Commun ; 19(4): 413-40, 2014 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24266450

RESUMEN

Although most young adults with mood and anxiety disorders do not seek treatment, those who are better informed about mental health problems are more likely to use services. The authors used conjoint analysis to model strategies for providing information about anxiety and depression to young adults. Participants (N = 1,035) completed 17 choice tasks presenting combinations of 15 four-level attributes of a mental health information strategy. Latent class analysis yielded 3 segments. The virtual segment (28.7%) preferred working independently on the Internet to obtain information recommended by young adults who had experienced anxiety or depression. Self-assessment options and links to service providers were more important to this segment. Conventional participants (30.1%) preferred books or pamphlets recommended by a doctor, endorsed by mental health professionals, and used with a doctor's support. They would devote more time to information acquisition but were less likely to use Internet social networking options. Brief sources of information were more important to the low interest segment (41.2%). All segments preferred information about alternative ways to reduce anxiety or depression rather than psychological approaches or medication. Maximizing the use of information requires active and passive approaches delivered through old-media (e.g., books) and new-media (e.g., Internet) channels.


Asunto(s)
Ansiedad/prevención & control , Conducta de Elección , Comportamiento del Consumidor , Información de Salud al Consumidor , Depresión/prevención & control , Adolescente , Adulto , Libros , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Humanos , Conducta en la Búsqueda de Información , Internet/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Modelos Psicológicos , Investigación Cualitativa , Adulto Joven
3.
Behav Cogn Psychother ; 42(2): 238-42, 2014 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23507254

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Post event processing (PEP) in social anxiety disorder involves rumination about social events after the fact, and is thought to be a crucial feature of the maintenance of the disorder. AIMS: The current experiment aimed to manipulate the use of PEP in individuals with social anxiety disorder. METHOD: Forty-one individuals with social anxiety disorder completed a videotaped speech. Anxiety ratings and degree of PEP were measured after the task as well as the day following the experiment. RESULTS: Individuals in the distract group reported a greater decrease in anxiety from baseline to post-experimental task than those asked to focus. Individuals in the distract group also reported higher PEP about the task than those instructed to complete a focus task, which appeared to be partially accounted for by baseline differences in symptom severity and state anxiety. Degree of PEP was positively correlated with anxiety ratings, both after the experimental task as well as 24 hours later. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that naturalistic PEP is problematic for individuals with social anxiety disorder, especially for those with more severe symptoms. A distraction task, even with breakthrough PEP, appears to have useful short-term effects on anxiety reduction as compared to focus instructions.


Asunto(s)
Atención , Trastornos Fóbicos/psicología , Trastornos Fóbicos/terapia , Ajuste Social , Conducta Social , Pensamiento , Adaptación Psicológica , Adulto , Ansiedad/psicología , Nivel de Alerta , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Fóbicos/diagnóstico , Autoevaluación (Psicología) , Habla , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Grabación en Video
4.
Behav Neurosci ; 122(3): 704-9, 2008 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18513140

RESUMEN

The shy-bold continuum is a fundamental behavioral trait conserved across human and nonhuman animals. Individual differences along the shy-bold continuum are presumed to arise from, and are maintained by, differences in the excitability of forebrain limbic areas involved in the evaluation of stimulus saliency. To test this hypothesis, the authors conducted an event-related functional MRI (fMRI) study in which brain scans were acquired on shy and bold adults during the presentation of neutral stranger and personally familiar faces. Shy adults exhibited greater bilateral amygdala activation during the presentation of stranger faces and greater left amygdala activation during personally familiar faces than their bold counterparts. Bold adults exhibited greater bilateral nucleus accumbens activation in response to stranger and personally familiar faces than shy adults. Findings suggest that there are distinct neural substrates underlying and maintaining individual differences along a shy-bold continuum in humans.


Asunto(s)
Mapeo Encefálico , Cara/fisiología , Reconocimiento Visual de Modelos/fisiología , Personalidad/fisiología , Reconocimiento en Psicología , Adulto , Amígdala del Cerebelo/irrigación sanguínea , Amígdala del Cerebelo/fisiología , Análisis de Varianza , Femenino , Humanos , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Núcleo Accumbens/irrigación sanguínea , Núcleo Accumbens/fisiología , Oxígeno/sangre , Inventario de Personalidad , Estimulación Luminosa , Tiempo de Reacción/fisiología
5.
Behav Res Ther ; 45(8): 1883-92, 2007 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17442265

RESUMEN

The current study investigated whether exposure with response prevention (ERP) for obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) is more effective when administered in a participant's home or other natural environments where symptoms tend to occur, than in a therapist's office. Twenty-eight outpatients with a principal diagnosis of OCD were randomly assigned to receive ERP in their therapist's office vs. wherever their symptoms usually occur (e.g., at home, at work, in public places, in the car, etc.). Participants received 14, 90-min sessions of ERP with an individual therapist. Participants were assessed at pretreatment, post-treatment, and at 3- and 6-month follow-up. Assessments included both self-report as well as clinician-rated indicators of OCD symptom severity, depression, and functional impairment. Results suggested that participants improved significantly, regardless of where treatment occurred. There were no differences in efficacy between the home-based and office-based treatment for OCD. Implications of these findings are discussed.


Asunto(s)
Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Servicios de Atención a Domicilio Provisto por Hospital , Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo/terapia , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital , Adulto , Depresión/terapia , Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ontario , Pacientes Desistentes del Tratamiento , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Behav Res Ther ; 44(1): 85-98, 2006 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16301016

RESUMEN

Exposure to panic symptoms (interoceptive exposure) is often included as part of treatment for panic disorder (PD), although little is known about the relative effects of particular symptom induction exercises. This study describes responses of individuals with PD and nonclinical controls to 13 standard symptom induction exercises and 3 control exercises. Generally, individuals with PD responded more strongly to symptom induction exercises than did controls. The exercises producing the most fear included spinning, hyperventilation, breathing through a straw, and using a tongue depressor. This study also reports findings regarding specific symptoms triggered by each exercise, the percentage of participants reporting fear during each exercise, and predictors of fear.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno de Pánico/psicología , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Desensibilización Psicológica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Trastorno de Pánico/terapia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
7.
Behav Res Ther ; 44(8): 1177-85, 2006 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16257387

RESUMEN

This study investigated the psychometric properties of the Social Phobia Inventory [SPIN; Connor, K. M., Davidson, J. R. T., Churchill, L. E., Sherwood, A., Foa, E., Wesler, R.H., 2000. Psychometric properties of the Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN). British Journal of Psychiatry, 176, 379-386], a measure of severity in social phobia (social anxiety disorder). Participants included 132 participants with social phobia, 57 participants with panic disorder and agoraphobia (PDA), and 62 participants with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Confirming findings from an initial validation study, the SPIN was found to have excellent internal consistency and good test-retest reliability. It also distinguished well between those with social phobia and those with either PDA or OCD. Good convergent and discriminant validity were established by examining correlations with other conceptually related and unrelated scales. Finally, the SPIN was sensitive to changes in social phobia severity following cognitive behavioral group treatment. In conclusion, the SPIN is both reliable and valid for the measurement of social phobia severity and outcome following psychological treatment.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Fóbicos/diagnóstico , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Adulto , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo/diagnóstico , Trastorno de Pánico/diagnóstico , Psicometría , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Factores Socioeconómicos
8.
Psychol Assess ; 17(2): 132-43, 2005 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16029101

RESUMEN

The 25-item Clark-Beck Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory (CBOCI) was developed to assess the frequency and severity of obsessive and compulsive symptoms. The measure uses a graded-response format to assess core symptom features of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) based on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.; American Psychiatric Association, 1994) criteria and current cognitive-behavioral formulations. Revisions were made to the CBOCI on the basis of psychometric and item analyses of an initial pilot study of clinical and nonclinical participants. The construct validity of the revised CBOCI was supported in a subsequent validation study involving OCD, nonobsessional clinical, and nonclinical samples. A principal-factor analysis of the 25 items found 2 highly correlated factors of Obsessions and Compulsions. OCD patients scored significantly higher on the measure than nonobsessional anxious, depressed, and nonclinical samples. The questionnaire had strong convergent validity with other OCD symptom measures but more modest discriminant validity.


Asunto(s)
Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo/diagnóstico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Proyectos Piloto , Psicometría/métodos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
9.
Environ Health Perspect ; 110 Suppl 4: 669-71, 2002 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12194904

RESUMEN

Idiopathic environmental intolerance (IEI), also known as multiple chemical sensitivity, is a clinical description for a cluster of symptoms of unknown etiology that have been attributed by patients to multiple environmental exposures when other medical explanations have been excluded. Because allergy has not been clearly demonstrated and current toxicological paradigms for exposure-symptom relationships do not readily accommodate IEI, psychogenic theories have been the focus of a number of investigations. A significantly higher lifetime prevalence of major depression, mood disorders, anxiety disorders, and somatization disorder has been reported among patients with environmental illness compared with that in controls. Symptoms often include anxiety, lightheadedness, impaired mentation, poor coordination, breathlessness (without wheezing), tremor, and abdominal discomfort. Responses to intravenous sodium lactate challenge or single-breath inhalation of 35% carbon dioxide versus a similar breath inhalation of clean air have shown a greater frequency of panic responses in subjects with IEI than in control subjects, although such responses did not occur in all subjects. Preliminary genetic findings suggest an increased frequency of a common genotype with panic disorder patients. The panic responses in a significant proportion of IEI patients opens a therapeutic window of opportunity. Patients in whom panic responses may at least be a contributing factor to their symptoms might be responsive to intervention with psychotherapy to enable their desensitization or deconditioning of responses to odors and other triggers, and/or may be helped by anxiolytic medications, relaxation training, and counseling for stress management.


Asunto(s)
Sensibilidad Química Múltiple/psicología , Trastorno de Pánico/fisiopatología , Administración por Inhalación , Ansiolíticos/uso terapéutico , Dióxido de Carbono/administración & dosificación , Consejo , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Genotipo , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Sensibilidad Química Múltiple/genética , Sensibilidad Química Múltiple/terapia , Odorantes , Trastorno de Pánico/genética , Psicoterapia , Terapia por Relajación , Lactato de Sodio , Estrés Psicológico
10.
CNS Spectr ; 8(8 Suppl 1): 7-16, 2003 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14767394

RESUMEN

What are the latest psychotherapeutic and pharmacotherapeutic treatment recommendations for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD)? OCD is a relatively common disorder with a lifetime prevalence of approximately 2% in the general population. It often has an early onset, usually in childhood or adolescence, and frequently becomes chronic and disabling if left untreated. High associated healthcare utilization and costs, and reduced productivity resulting in loss of earning, pose a huge economic burden to OCD patients and their families, employers, and society. OCD is characterized by the presence of obsessions and compulsions that are time-consuming, cause marked distress, or significantly interfere with a person's functioning. Most patients with OCD experience symptoms throughout their lives and benefit from long-term treatment. Both psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy are recommended, either alone or in combination, for the treatment of OCD. Cognitive-behavioral therapy is the psychotherapy of choice. Pharmacologic treatment options include the tricyclic antidepressant clomipramine and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) citalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, and sertraline. These have all shown benefit in acute treatment trials; clomipramine, fluvoxamine, fluoxetine, and sertraline have also demonstrated benefit in long-term treatment trials (at least 24 weeks), and clomipramine, sertraline, and fluvoxamine have United States Food and Drug Administration approvals for use in children and adolescents. Available treatment guidelines recommend first-line use of an SSRI (ie, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, sertraline, or citalopram) in preference to clomipramine, due to the latter's less favorable adverse-event profile. Further, pharmacotherapy for a minimum of 1-2 years is recommended before very gradual withdrawal may be considered.


Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos Tricíclicos/uso terapéutico , Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo/terapia , Psicoterapia/métodos , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Antidepresivos Tricíclicos/economía , Terapia Combinada , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo/economía , Psicoterapia/economía , Calidad de Vida , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/economía
11.
CNS Spectr ; 8(8 Suppl 1): 17-30, 2003 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14767395

RESUMEN

What are the symptoms of panic disorder and how is the disorder most effectively treated? One of the most commonly encountered anxiety disorders in the primary care setting, panic disorder is a chronic and debilitating illness. The core symptoms are recurrent panic attacks coupled with anticipatory anxiety and phobic avoidance, which together impair the patient's professional, social, and familial functioning. Patients with panic disorder have medically unexplained symptoms that lead to overutilization of healthcare services. Panic disorder is often comorbid with agoraphobia and major depression, and patients may be at increased risk of cardiovascular disease and, possibly, suicide. Research into the optimal treatment of this disorder has been undertaken in the past 2 decades, and numerous randomized, controlled trials have been published. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors have emerged as the most favorable treatment, as they have a beneficial side-effect profile, are relatively safe (even if taken in overdose), and do not produce physical dependency. High-potency benzodiazepines, reversible monoamine oxidase inhibitors, and tricyclic antidepressants have also shown antipanic efficacy. In addition, cognitive-behavioral therapy has demonstrated efficacy in the acute and long-term treatment of panic disorder. An integrated treatment approach that combines pharmacotherapy with cognitive-behavioral therapy may provide the best treatment. Long-term efficacy and ease of use are important considerations in treatment selection, as maintenance treatment is recommended for at least 12-24 months, and in some cases, indefinitely.


Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos Tricíclicos/uso terapéutico , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Inhibidores de la Monoaminooxidasa/uso terapéutico , Trastorno de Pánico/terapia , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Antidepresivos Tricíclicos/administración & dosificación , Benzodiazepinas/administración & dosificación , Terapia Combinada , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Inhibidores de la Monoaminooxidasa/administración & dosificación , Trastorno de Pánico/diagnóstico , Trastorno de Pánico/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/administración & dosificación
12.
CNS Spectr ; 8(8 Suppl 1): 31-9, 2003 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14767396

RESUMEN

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a common and disabling condition. In addition to combat-related PTSD, the disorder occurs in civilians exposed to severe traumatic events, with the community prevalence rate for the combined populations reaching as high as 12%. If left untreated, PTSD may continue for years after the stressor event, resulting in severe functional and emotional impairment and a dramatic reduction in quality of life, with negative economic consequences for both the sufferer and society as a whole. Although PTSD is often overlooked, diagnosis is relatively straightforward once a triggering stressor event and the triad of persistent symptoms-reexperiencing the traumatic event, avoiding stimuli associated with the trauma, and hyperarousal have been identified. However, comorbid conditions of anxiety and depression frequently hamper accurate diagnosis. Treatment for PTSD includes psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy. The latter includes selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), tricyclic antidepressants, and monoamine oxidase inhibitors. Only SSRIs have been proven effective and safe in long-term randomized controlled trials. Current guidelines from the Expert Consensus Panel for PTSD recommend treatment of chronic PTSD for a minimum of 12-24 months.


Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos Tricíclicos/uso terapéutico , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Inhibidores de la Monoaminooxidasa/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/uso terapéutico , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/terapia , Terapia Combinada , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/diagnóstico , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores de Tiempo
13.
CNS Spectr ; 8(8 Suppl 1): 53-61, 2003 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14767398

RESUMEN

What are the current recommendations for the long-term treatment of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD)? GAD is a common disorder with a lifetime prevalence of 4% to 7% in the general population. GAD is characterized by excessive, uncontrollable worry or anxiety about a number of events or activities that the individual experiences on more days than not over a 6-month period. Onset of GAD symptoms usually occurs during an individual's early twenties; however, high rates of GAD have also been seen in children and adolescents. The clinical course of GAD is often chronic, with 40% of patients reporting illness lasting >5 years. GAD is associated with pronounced functional impairment, resulting in decreased vocational function and reduced quality of life. Patients with GAD tend to be high users of outpatient medical care, which contributes significantly to healthcare costs. Currently, benzodiazepines and buspirone are prescribed frequently to treat GAD. Although both show efficacy in acute treatment trials, few long-term studies have been performed. Benzodiazepines are not recommended for long-term treatment of GAD, due to associated development of tolerance, psychomotor impairment, cognitive and memory changes, physical dependence, and a withdrawal reaction on discontinuation. The antidepressant venlafaxine extended-release (XR) has received approval for the treatment of GAD in the United States and many other countries. Venlafaxine XR has demonstrated efficacy over placebo in two randomized treatment trials of 6 months' duration as well as in other acute trials. Paroxetine is the first of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) to receive US approval for the treatment of GAD. Paroxetine demonstrated superiority to placebo in short-term trials, and investigations into the use of other SSRIs are ongoing. This suggests that other SSRIs, and serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors, are likely to be effective in the treatment of GAD. Of the psychological therapies, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) shows the greatest benefit in treating GAD patients. Treatment gains after a 12-week course of CBT may be maintained for up to 1 year. Currently, no guidelines exist for the long-term treatment of GAD.


Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos Tricíclicos/uso terapéutico , Trastornos de Ansiedad/terapia , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/uso terapéutico , Trastornos de Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Trastornos de Ansiedad/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Combinada , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos
14.
CNS Spectr ; 8(8 Suppl 1): 40-52, 2003 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14767397

RESUMEN

What is the best approach for treating patients with social phobia (social anxiety disorder) over the long term? Social phobia is the most common anxiety disorder, with reported prevalence rates of up to 18.7%. Social phobia is characterized by a marked and persistent fear of being observed or evaluated by others in social performance or interaction situations and is associated with physical, cognitive, and behavioral (ie, avoidance) symptoms. The onset of social phobia typically occurs in childhood or adolescence and the clinical course, if left untreated, is usually chronic, unremitting, and associated with significant functional impairment. Social phobia exhibits a high degree of comorbidity with other psychiatric disorders, including mood disorders, anxiety disorders, and substance abuse/dependence. Few people with social phobia seek professional help despite the existence of beneficial treatment approaches. The efficacy, tolerability, and safety of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), evidenced in randomized clinical trials, support these agents as first-line treatment. The benzodiazepine clonazepam and certain monoamine oxidase inhibitors (representing both reversible and nonreversible inhibitors) may also be of benefit. Treatment of social phobia may need to be continued for several months to consolidate response and achieve full remission. The SSRIs have shown benefit in long-term treatment trials, while long-term treatment data from clinical studies of clonazepam are limited but support the drug's efficacy. There is also evidence for the effectiveness of exposure-based strategies of cognitive-behavioral therapy, and controlled studies suggest that the effects of treatment are generally maintained at long-term follow-up. In light of the chronicity and disability associated with social phobia, as well as the high relapse rate after short-term therapy, it is recommended that effective treatment be continued for at least 12 months.


Asunto(s)
Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Inhibidores de la Monoaminooxidasa/uso terapéutico , Trastornos Fóbicos/terapia , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Terapia Combinada , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Trastornos Fóbicos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Fóbicos/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores de Tiempo
15.
Behav Res Ther ; 42(12): 1453-67, 2004 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15500815

RESUMEN

The diverse symptomatology of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is being increasingly regarded as reducible to a few symptom dimensions. However, prevailing factor-analytically derived models of symptom structure omit a number of the well-recognized "miscellaneous" symptoms of OCD. This study sought to determine whether miscellaneous OCD symptoms, ascertained by the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale symptom checklist, could be differentially and reliably predicted by four symptom factors (obsessions and checking, symmetry and ordering, contamination and cleaning, and hoarding) in two independent groups of individuals with OCD (n=381 and n=107). Logistic regression analyses were used to determine the association of each of the miscellaneous symptoms with the symptom factors; then a single confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to test the model of associations in the smaller sample. Sixteen (89%) of the 18 symptoms examined were reliably predicted by one (11 items) or two (5 items) of the factors, with obsessions and checking and symmetry and ordering emerging as foremost predictors. The expanded four-factor model showed good fit with data from the second sample. Results are conceptually meaningful, but suggest the inadequacy of groupings based solely upon overt behaviors. These findings may aid clinical understanding of OCD and be of value to studies using symptom factors to guide investigation of its causes and correlates.


Asunto(s)
Modelos Psicológicos , Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo/psicología , Adulto , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo/diagnóstico
16.
J Anxiety Disord ; 18(1): 7-18, 2004.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14725865

RESUMEN

The purpose of this study was to test the theory put forth by Zvolensky et al. [Clin. Psychol. Sci. Pract. 10 (2003) 29] that smoking is specifically associated with panic disorder (PD) and not more generally associated with other anxiety disorders. Smoking behaviors were examined across three anxiety disorders: panic disorder with or without agoraphobia, social phobia (SP), and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). A greater proportion of the PD group (40.4%) reported smoking compared to the SP (20%) and OCD (22.4%) groups. Those in the PD group were also more likely than those in the other groups to report being a heavy smoker (greater than 10 cigarettes daily). No significant interaction between diagnosis and smoking status was found for any of the symptom measures. However, participants who smoked had significantly higher scores than nonsmokers on a number of scales, including measures of depression, general anxiety, and distress. Differences in anxiety sensitivity between smokers and nonsmokers approached significance. These findings provide support for Zvolensky et al.'s [Clin. Psychol. Sci. Pract. 10 (2003) 29] theoretical conceptualization and suggest a specific link between smoking and panic disorder. Further investigation is warranted to determine the causal direction of this association.


Asunto(s)
Agorafobia/etiología , Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo/etiología , Trastorno de Pánico/etiología , Trastornos Fóbicos/etiología , Fumar/efectos adversos , Actividades Cotidianas , Adulto , Agorafobia/psicología , Análisis de Varianza , Trastornos de Ansiedad/etiología , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo/psicología , Ontario , Trastorno de Pánico/psicología , Trastornos Fóbicos/psicología , Fumar/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo
17.
Evid Based Med ; 11(6): 184, 2006 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17213178
19.
J Anxiety Disord ; 23(2): 290-6, 2009 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18819774

RESUMEN

High rates of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptoms have been reported in individuals diagnosed with anxiety and depressive disorders. However, most studies have investigated these relations in a single disorder, rather than a heterogeneous group of patients, thereby not allowing for comparisons across anxiety disorders and depression, or for considering the effects of comorbidity. Thus, the present study investigated the symptoms of IBS in a diverse group of patients (N=357) by administering questionnaires and a diagnostic interview. A high frequency of IBS symptoms was found in patients with panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. However, the frequency of IBS symptoms in patients with social anxiety disorder, specific phobia, and obsessive-compulsive disorder was comparable to rates found in community samples. In addition, anxiety sensitivity and illness attitudes and intrusiveness were predictive of elevated IBS symptomatology. Together, these findings emphasize the role physiological symptoms of anxiety and worry in the co-occurrence of the anxiety disorders and IBS.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Trastornos de Ansiedad/epidemiología , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/epidemiología , Síndrome del Colon Irritable/diagnóstico , Síndrome del Colon Irritable/epidemiología , Adulto , Trastornos de Ansiedad/psicología , Actitud Frente a la Salud , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/psicología , Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales , Femenino , Humanos , Hipocondriasis/diagnóstico , Hipocondriasis/epidemiología , Hipocondriasis/psicología , Síndrome del Colon Irritable/fisiopatología , Masculino , Prevalencia , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
20.
Braz J Psychiatry ; 31(4): 328-31, 2009 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20098824

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA(A)) system may be implicated in obsessive-compulsive disorder, based on its major role in modulation of anxiety and its function as the principal inhibitory neurotransmitter system in the cortex. In addition, glutamatergic/GABAergic mechanisms appear to play a role in the pathophysiology of obsessive-compulsive disorder, making the GABA(A) receptor-γ2 (GABργ2) gene a good candidate for susceptibility in this disorder. METHOD: 118 probands meeting DSM-IV criteria for primary obsessive-compulsive disorder and their available parents were recruited for participation in this study and informed consent was obtained. An NciI restriction site polymorphism in the second intron was genotyped and data was analyzed using the Transmission Disequilibrium Test. RESULTS: In total, 61 of the participating families were informative (i.e., with at least one heterozygous parent). No biases were observed in the transmission of either of the two alleles (chi² = 0.016, 1 d.f., p = 0.898) to the affected probands in the total sample. CONCLUSION/DISCUSSION: While these results do not provide support for a major role for the GABA(A) receptor-γ2 in obsessive-compulsive disorder, further investigations of this gene in larger samples are warranted.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo/genética , Receptores de GABA-A/genética , Adulto , Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales , Femenino , Frecuencia de los Genes , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Genotipo , Humanos , Desequilibrio de Ligamiento , Masculino , Polimorfismo Genético
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda