Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Cancer Control ; 29: 10732748211070720, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35001670

RESUMEN

Data is limited on the immunogenicity of the COVID-19 two-vaccination series among patients with hematologic malignancies and current guidelines do not recommend routine monitoring for post-vaccine antibodies. However, we describe three patients who developed severe or critical COVID-19 infections six months after vaccination. This highlights the importance of routine testing of COVID-19 IgG Spike, semi-quantitative antibodies post-vaccination, particularly among immunocompromised patients.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Neoplasias Hematológicas/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anticuerpos Antivirales/análisis , Humanos , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , SARS-CoV-2
5.
Postgrad Med J ; 98(e1): e6, 2022 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37066566
6.
Postgrad Med J ; 98(e1): e31, 2022 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37066579
7.
Postgrad Med J ; 97(1148): 349-350, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32423921
8.
Cureus ; 13(2): e13125, 2021 Feb 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33728142

RESUMEN

Cefepime, a fourth-generation cephalosporin, remains an essential antibiotic targeting a broad spectrum of Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms. However, it also remains an important, yet often unrecognized, cause of encephalopathy. We are here to discuss a case of a 74-year-old male with a common bile duct low-grade adenoma who presented to the hospital for lethargy. He was placed on intravenous cefepime for a Pseudomonas-infected hepatobiliary abscess. Approximately five days later, the patient's spouse reported acutely worsening cognitive changes. The cefepime level was significantly elevated at 160 µg/mL. Although not completely understood, cefepime is felt to antagonize gamma-aminobutyric acid A (GABA-A) receptors and possibly inhibit GABA release. This risk is accentuated in patients with underlying renal dysfunction and increased inflammation across the blood-brain barrier. Clinical manifestations include an impaired level of consciousness, delirium, myoclonus, and seizures. The treatment of choice is the cessation of the antibiotic, which resolves the neurotoxicity within approximately 48 hours. It is important to recognize cefepime as a potential culprit of acute-onset encephalopathy in the appropriate clinical setting, and the cessation of therapy would lead to a complete resolution of its associated neurotoxicity.

9.
Cancer Med ; 10(17): 5765-5774, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34350715

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a state of increased vulnerability to stressors, and predicts risk of adverse outcomes, such as mortality. Frailty can be defined by a frailty index (FI) using an accumulation of deficits approach. An FI comprised of 20 items derived from our previously studied test-based frailty index (TBFI) and an additional 33 survey-based elements sourced from the standard CGA was developed to evaluate if predictive validity of survival was improved. METHODS: One hundred eighty-nine cancer patients during acute hospitalization were consented between September 2018 and May 2019. Frailty scores were calculated, and patients were categorized into four groups: non-frail (0-0.2), mildly frail (0.2-0.3), moderately frail (0.3-0.4), and severely frail (>0.4). Patients were followed for 1-year to assess FI and TBFI prediction of survival. Area under the curve (AUC) statistics from ROC analyses were compared for the FI versus TBFI. RESULTS: Increasing frailty was similarly associated with increased risk of mortality (HR, 4.5 [95% CI, 2.519-8.075] and HR, 4.1 [95%CI, 1.692-9.942]) and the likelihood of death at 6 months was about 11-fold (odds ratio, 10.9 [95% CI, 3.97-33.24]) and 9.73-fold (95% CI, 2.85-38.50) higher for severely frail patients compared to non-frail patients for FI and TBFI, respectively. This association was independent of age and type of cancer. The FI and TBFI were predictive of survival for older and younger cancer patients with no significant differences between models in discriminating survival (FI AUC, 0.747 [95% CI, 0.6772-0.8157] and TBFI AUC, 0.724 [95% CI, 0.6513-0.7957]). CONCLUSIONS: The TBFI was predictive of survival, and the addition of an in-person assessment (FI) did not greatly improve predictive validity. Increasing frailty, as measured by a TBFI, resulted in a meaningfully increased risk of mortality and may be well-suited for screening of hospitalized cancer patients.


Asunto(s)
Fragilidad/etiología , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Fragilidad/patología , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis de Supervivencia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda