Importance of internal vaginal pelvic floor muscle exams for women with external lumbar/hip/pelvic girdle pain.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The relationship between external lumbar, hip, and/or pelvic girdle pain and internal vaginal pelvic floor myofascial pain is not well described. We assessed this relationship in a cohort of adult women. METHODS: The cohort included women ≥ 18 years old who received care for external lumbar, hip, and/or pelvic girdle pain (reported or elicited on physical examination) who then underwent internal vaginal myofascial levator ani pain assessments, in a tertiary care Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery pelvic pain clinic over a 2-year period (2013 and 2014). RESULTS: The cohort of 177 women had an average age of 44.9±16.0 years, an average body mass index of 27.2±7.0 kg/m2, and the majority (79.2%) were white. Most patients presented with a chief complaint of pelvic (51.4%), vulvovaginal (18.6%), and/or lumbar (15.3%) pain. Women who reported symptoms of lumbar, hip, or pelvic girdle pain were more likely to have pain on vaginal pelvic floor muscle examination than women without this history (OR, 7.24; 95% CI, 1.95-26.93, p=0.003). The majority (85.9%) of women had bilateral internal vaginal pelvic floor myofascial pain on examination. CONCLUSIONS: Although participants did not describe "vaginal pelvic floor myofascial pain," the high detection rate for internal vaginal pelvic floor myofascial pain on clinical examination highlights an opportunity to improve treatment planning. These findings suggest that the vaginal pelvic floor muscle examination should be part of the assessment of all women with lumbar, hip, and/or pelvic girdle pain. The relationship between this finding and clinical outcomes following directed treatment warrants additional study.

Vaginal estrogen therapy is associated with increased Lactobacillus in the urine of postmenopausal women with overactive bladder symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Previous work has shown that the vaginal microbiome decreases in Lactobacillus predominance and becomes more diverse after menopause. It has also been shown that estrogen therapy restores Lactobacillus dominance in the vagina and that topical estrogen is associated with overactive bladder symptom improvement. We now know that the bladder contains a unique microbiome and that increased bladder microbiome diversity is associated with overactive bladder. However, there is no understanding of how quickly each pelvic floor microbiome responds to estrogen or if those changes are associated with symptom improvement. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine if estrogen treatment of postmenopausal women with overactive bladder decreases urobiome diversity. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed data from postmenopausal participants in 2 trials (NCT02524769 and NCT02835846) who chose vaginal estrogen as the primary overactive bladder treatment and used 0.5 g of conjugated estrogen (Premarin cream; Pfizer, New York City, NY) twice weekly for 12 weeks. Baseline and 12-week follow-up data included the Overactive Bladder questionnaire, and participants provided urine samples via catheter, vaginal swabs, perineal swabs, and voided urine samples. Microbes were detected by an enhanced culture protocol. Linear mixed models were used to estimate microbiome changes over time. Urinary antimicrobial peptide activity was assessed by a bacterial growth inhibition assay and correlated with relative abundance of members of the urobiome. RESULTS: In this study, 12 weeks of estrogen treatment resulted in decreased microbial diversity within the vagina (Shannon, P=.047; Richness, P=.043) but not in the other niches. A significant increase in Lactobacillus was detected in the bladder (P=.037) but not in the vagina (P=.33), perineum (P=.56), or voided urine (P=.28). The change in Lactobacillus levels in the bladder was associated with modest changes in urgency incontinence symptoms (P=.02). The relative abundance of the genus Corynebacterium correlated positively with urinary antimicrobial peptide activity after estrogen treatment. CONCLUSION: Estrogen therapy may change the microbiome of different pelvic floor niches. The vagina begins to decrease in diversity, and the bladder experiences a significant increase in Lactobacillus levels; the latter is correlated with a modest improvement in the symptom severity subscale of the Overactive Bladder questionnaire.

The impact of close surgical margins after radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVE: While it is known that positive surgical margins increase the risk of cervical cancer recurrence, little is known about the effect of close surgical margins (CSM). Therefore, we set out to determine the impact of margin status on recurrence and survival in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of patients undergoing radical hysterectomy from 2000 to 2010 with Stage IA2-IIA cervical cancer. CSM were defined as ≤5mm; association with other clinicopathologic factors as well as recurrence and survival was evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 119 patients, 75 (63%) with CSM had a recurrence rate of 24% compared to 9% without CSM. Though not independently associated with recurrence, CSM were significantly associated with positive lymph nodes (44% vs. 18%), positive parametria (33.3% vs. 2.3%), larger tumors (3.5 vs. 2.5cm), greater depth of stromal invasion (DOI) (84% vs. 33%), and lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) (61.3% vs. 34.1%). We failed to find an association between adjuvant therapy and recurrence in those with CSM. Exploratory analysis revealed that a surgical margin of ≤2mm was significantly associated with an increased risk of overall recurrence (36% vs. 9%, p=0.009) as well as loco-regional recurrence (22% vs. 4%, p=0.0034). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical margins of ≤5mm on radical hysterectomy specimens are often associated with other high or intermediate risk factors for recurrence. While not a proven independent risk factor, the distance to surgical margin may warrant further investigation as an intermediate risk factor along with tumor size, DOI and LVSI.

Ready or Not? Obstetrics and Gynecology Resident Preparedness for Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery Training.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the perception of female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery (FPMRS) program directors (PDs) and obstetrics and gynecology (OG) FMPRS fellows regarding the adequacy of OG residency as preparation for FPMRS fellowship. METHODS: Electronic invitations to complete a modified version of a validated survey were extended to FPMRS PDs and their second- and third-year OG FPMRS fellows who had just completed their first or second year of FPMRS fellowship, respectively. The survey consisted of 5 domains; qualitative questions and recommendations for improvement were elicited. RESULTS: Program directors (33%, 16/48) and second-year (64%, 29/45) and third-year (53%, 26/49) fellows completed the surveys. While incoming fellows were deemed professional, serious surgical skill competency issues were identified: (1) PDs felt they could not leave their incoming fellow to operate independently on a major case for 30 minutes while in the next room compared with fellow responses (PDs: 33.3% vs second-year fellows: 67.9%; P = 0.03); (2) no PDs felt their fellows could suture laparoscopically; and (3) there was group consensus that incoming fellows were not proficient at cystoscopy (PDs: 40.0%, second-year fellows: 39.3%, third-year fellows: 32.0%; P = 0.82). Mostly, fellows could clinically evaluate and manage patients. Program directors thought their fellows had better understanding of statistics than fellows believed of themselves (P = 0.05). Increasing FPMRS exposure during residency was favored as the method to better prepare OG residents for fellowship. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative and emerging qualitative outcomes highlight that fellows are professional and are largely able to evaluate and care for patients but that achieving independence, surgical skills, and scholarship requires further training.

Anesthetic Cream Use During Office Pessary Removal and Replacement: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effect of lidocaine-prilocaine cream on patient pain at the time of office pessary removal and reinsertion. METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial, participants undergoing routine pessary care in a urogynecology office at a tertiary referral center were randomized to application of 4 g of either lidocaine-prilocaine or placebo cream 5 minutes before pessary change. Visual analog scale pain scores were collected from the patient at baseline, after pessary removal, and after pessary reinsertion. Physicians also recorded their estimate of patient pain at pessary removal and reinsertion. The primary outcome was the participant-reported visual analog scale pain score at the time of pessary removal and reinsertion. A sample size of 26 per group (n=52) was planned to estimate an absolute mean difference in visual analog scale pain of 2.1 cm at the time of pessary removal. An analysis of covariance was used to evaluate pain at removal and reinsertion as a function of treatment assignment controlling for baseline pain. RESULTS: From July 2015 through February 2016, 116 women were screened and 54 were recruited: 28 in the lidocaine-prilocaine cream group and 26 in the placebo group. One patient in the lidocaine-prilocaine cream group was later withdrawn owing to vaginal erosion. The participants were all postmenopausal women, with an average age of 77.8 years. Most characteristics were similar between groups. After adjusting for baseline pain, participants randomized to the lidocaine-prilocaine group had lower pain at pessary removal when compared with those assigned to placebo (mean difference=-2.05, 95% confidence interval -3.69 to -0.41; P=.015). CONCLUSION: Lidocaine-prilocaine cream use at the time of office pessary removal reduces patient-reported pain. Clinicians may wish to include this simple intervention to optimize patient comfort and compliance. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02380742.