Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Publication year range
1.
J Clin Med ; 13(11)2024 May 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38892807

RESUMEN

Atherosclerosis is the predominant underlying etiopathology of coronary artery disease. Changes in plaque phenotype from stable to high risk may spur future major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Different pharmacological therapies have been implemented to mitigate this risk. Over the last two decades, intravascular imaging modalities have emerged in clinical studies to clarify how these therapies may affect the composition and burden of coronary plaques. Lipid-lowering agents, such as statins, ezetimibe, and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors, were shown not only to reduce low-density lipoprotein levels and MACE but also to directly affect features of coronary plaque vulnerability. Studies have demonstrated that lipid-lowering therapy reduces the percentage of atheroma volume and number of macrophages and increases fibrous cap thickness. Future studies should answer the question of whether pharmacological plaque stabilization may be sufficient to mitigate the risk of MACE for selected groups of patients with atherosclerotic coronary disease.

2.
J Invasive Cardiol ; 35(7): E365-E374, 2023 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37769620

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recurrent in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a serious problem. Optimal modification of the underlying mechanism during index percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is key to prevent ISR. Excimer laser coronary atherectomy (ELCA) has its own indications and is among others used in recurrent ISR in case of stent underexpansion and/or diffuse neointimal hyperplasia. We aimed to assess the long-term clinical outcomes of ELCA for the management of recurrent ISR. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective observational study was conducted. Patients with recurrent ISR who were additionally treated with ELCA were included. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, target lesion revascularization at 12 months, and longer term. RESULTS: Between 2014 and 2022, 51 patients underwent PCI with the additional use ELCA for recurrent ISR. Primary outcome occurred in 6 patients (11.8%) at 12 months and in 12 patients (23.5%) at a median follow-up of 4 (1-6) years. Technical and procedural success were achieved in 92% and 90% of cases, respectively. Coronary perforation occurred in 2 patients as a result of distal wire perforation, but was not ELCA-related. There were no in-hospital MACE. CONCLUSIONS: ELCA appears to be a safe method with acceptable long-term results for the management of recurrent ISR.


Asunto(s)
Aterectomía Coronaria , Reestenosis Coronaria , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Humanos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Aterectomía Coronaria/efectos adversos , Aterectomía Coronaria/métodos , Reestenosis Coronaria/diagnóstico , Reestenosis Coronaria/etiología , Reestenosis Coronaria/cirugía , Láseres de Excímeros/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Angiografía Coronaria , Stents/efectos adversos , Constricción Patológica/etiología
3.
Int J Cardiol ; 331: 176-182, 2021 05 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33545260

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Infective endocarditis (IE) remains a severe disease with high mortality. Most studies report on short-term outcome while real world long-term outcome data are scarce. This study reports reinfection rates and mortality data during long-term follow-up. METHODS: A total of 270 patients meeting the modified Duke criteria for definite IE admitted to a tertiary care center between July 2000 and June 2007 were analyzed retrospectively. Early reinfection was defined as a new IE episode within 6 months; late reinfection as a new IE episode beyond 6 months follow-up. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 8.5 years. Early reinfection occurred in 10 patients (3.7%), late reinfection in 18 patients (6.7%). Staphylococci (39.7%) were the most frequent causative microorganisms, followed by Streptococci (30.0%) and Enterococci (17.8%). Independent predictors of any reinfection were heart failure (HR 3.02, 95% CI 1.42-6.41), peripheral embolization (HR 4.00, 95% CI 1.58-10.17) and implanted pacemakers (HR 3.43, 95% CI 1.25-9.36). Survival rates were 71.1%, 55.2% and 43.3% at respectively 1-, 5- and 10-years follow-up. Independent predictors for mortality were age (HR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.04), diabetes mellitus (HR 2.24, 95% CI 1.46-3.45), hemodialysis (HR 2.70, 95% CI 1.37-5.29), heart failure (HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.19-2.26), stroke (HR 1.73, 95% CI 1.18-2.52), antimicrobial treatment despite surgical indication (HR 5.53, 95% CI 3.59-8.49) and non-Streptococci causative microorganisms (HR 1.84, 95% CI 1.28-2.64). CONCLUSIONS: Contemporary mortality rates of infective endocarditis remain high, irrespective of reinfection. Heart failure, peripheral embolization and presence of a pacemaker were predictors of reinfection.


Asunto(s)
Endocarditis Bacteriana , Endocarditis , Endocarditis/diagnóstico , Endocarditis/epidemiología , Endocarditis/terapia , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Centros de Atención Terciaria
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda