Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Epidemiol Infect ; 150: e166, 2022 04 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35450542

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: EURO2020 generated a growing media and population interest across the month period, that peaked with large spontaneous celebrations across the country upon winning the tournament. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed data from the national surveillance system (indicator-based) and from event-based surveillance to assess how the epidemiology of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS CoV-2) changed in June-July 2021 and to describe cases and clusters linked with EURO2020. RESULTS: Widespread increases in transmission and case numbers, mainly among younger males, were documented in Italy, none were linked with stadium attendance. Vaccination coverage against SARS-CoV-2 was longer among cases linked to EURO2020 than among the general population. CONCLUSIONS: Transmission increased across the country, mainly due to gatherings outside the stadium, where, conversely, strict infection control measures were enforced. These informal 'side' gatherings were dispersed across the entire country and difficult to control. Targeted communication and control strategies to limit the impact of informal gatherings occurring outside official sites of mass gathering events should be further developed.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemias , COVID-19/epidemiología , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Pandemias/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
2.
Euro Surveill ; 26(25)2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34169819

RESUMEN

To assess the real-world impact of vaccines on COVID-19 related outcomes, we analysed data from over 7 million recipients of at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose in Italy. Taking 0-14 days post-first dose as reference, the SARS-CoV-2 infection risk subsequently decreased, reaching a reduction by 78% (incidence rate ratios (IRR): 0.22; 95% CI: 0.21-0.24) 43-49 days post-first dose. Similarly, hospitalisation and death risks decreased, with 89% (IRR: 0.11; 95% CI: 0.09-0.15) and 93% (IRR: 0.07; 95% CI: 0.04-0.11) reductions 36-42 days post-first dose. Our results support ongoing vaccination campaigns.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Vacunas , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Hospitalización , Hospitales , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Euro Surveill ; 25(49)2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33303064

RESUMEN

BackgroundOn 20 February 2020, a locally acquired coronavirus disease (COVID-19) case was detected in Lombardy, Italy. This was the first signal of ongoing transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in the country. The number of cases in Italy increased rapidly and the country became the first in Europe to experience a SARS-CoV-2 outbreak.AimOur aim was to describe the epidemiology and transmission dynamics of the first COVID-19 cases in Italy amid ongoing control measures.MethodsWe analysed all RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 cases reported to the national integrated surveillance system until 31 March 2020. We provide a descriptive epidemiological summary and estimate the basic and net reproductive numbers by region.ResultsOf the 98,716 cases of COVID-19 analysed, 9,512 were healthcare workers. Of the 10,943 reported COVID-19-associated deaths (crude case fatality ratio: 11.1%) 49.5% occurred in cases older than 80 years. Male sex and age were independent risk factors for COVID-19 death. Estimates of R0 varied between 2.50 (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.18-2.83) in Tuscany and 3.00 (95% CI: 2.68-3.33) in Lazio. The net reproduction number Rt in northern regions started decreasing immediately after the first detection.ConclusionThe COVID-19 outbreak in Italy showed a clustering onset similar to the one in Wuhan, China. R0 at 2.96 in Lombardy combined with delayed detection explains the high case load and rapid geographical spread. Overall, Rt in Italian regions showed early signs of decrease, with large diversity in incidence, supporting the importance of combined non-pharmacological control measures.


Asunto(s)
Número Básico de Reproducción , COVID-19/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , COVID-19/mortalidad , COVID-19/transmisión , Femenino , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad , SARS-CoV-2
4.
Epidemiol Prev ; 44(5-6 Suppl 2): 70-80, 2020.
Artículo en Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33412796

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: to describe the integrated surveillance system of COVID-19 in Italy, to illustrate the outputs used to return epidemiological information on the spread of the epidemic to the competent public health bodies and to the Italian population, and to describe how the surveillance data contributes to the ongoing weekly regional monitoring and risk assessment system. METHODS: the COVID-19 integrated surveillance system is the result of a close and continuous collaboration between the Italian National Institute of Health (ISS), the Italian Ministry of Health, and the regional and local health authorities. Through a web platform, it collects individual data of laboratory confirmed cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection and gathers information on their residence, laboratory diagnosis, hospitalisation, clinical status, risk factors, and outcome. Results, for different levels of aggregation and risk categories, are published daily and weekly on the ISS website, and made available to national and regional public health authorities; these results contribute one of the information sources of the regional monitoring and risk assessment system. RESULTS: the COVID-19 integrated surveillance system monitors the space-time distribution of cases and their characteristics. Indicators used in the weekly regional monitoring and risk assessment system include process indicators on completeness and results indicators on weekly trends of newly diagnosed cases per Region. CONCLUSIONS: the outputs of the integrated surveillance system for COVID-19 provide timely information to health authorities and to the general population on the evolution of the epidemic in Italy. They also contribute to the continuous re-assessment of risk related to transmission and impact of the epidemic thus contributing to the management of COVID-19 in Italy.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Vigilancia de la Población , SARS-CoV-2 , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Difusión de la Información , Italia/epidemiología , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Informe de Investigación , Riesgo
5.
BMJ ; 376: e069052, 2022 02 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35144968

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the effectiveness of mRNA vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe covid-19 at different time after vaccination. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Italy, 27 December 2020 to 7 November 2021. PARTICIPANTS: 33 250 344 people aged ≥16 years who received a first dose of BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) or mRNA-1273 (Moderna) vaccine and did not have a previous diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe covid-19 (admission to hospital or death). Data were divided by weekly time intervals after vaccination. Incidence rate ratios at different time intervals were estimated by multilevel negative binomial models with robust variance estimator. Sex, age group, brand of vaccine, priority risk category, and regional weekly incidence in the general population were included as covariates. Geographic region was included as a random effect. Adjusted vaccine effectiveness was calculated as (1-IRR)×100, where IRR=incidence rate ratio, with the time interval 0-14 days after the first dose of vaccine as the reference. RESULTS: During the epidemic phase when the delta variant was the predominant strain of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection significantly decreased (P<0.001) from 82% (95% confidence interval 80% to 84%) at 3-4 weeks after the second dose of vaccine to 33% (27% to 39%) at 27-30 weeks after the second dose. In the same time intervals, vaccine effectiveness against severe covid-19 also decreased (P<0.001), although to a lesser extent, from 96% (95% to 97%) to 80% (76% to 83%). High risk people (vaccine effectiveness -6%, -28% to 12%), those aged ≥80 years (11%, -15% to 31%), and those aged 60-79 years (2%, -11% to 14%) did not seem to be protected against infection at 27-30 weeks after the second dose of vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: The results support the vaccination campaigns targeting high risk people, those aged ≥60 years, and healthcare workers to receive a booster dose of vaccine six months after the primary vaccination cycle. The results also suggest that timing the booster dose earlier than six months after the primary vaccination cycle and extending the offer of the booster dose to the wider eligible population might be warranted.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273/inmunología , Vacuna BNT162/inmunología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Inmunización Secundaria/estadística & datos numéricos , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidad , Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Vacuna BNT162/administración & dosificación , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/inmunología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal , Incidencia , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
6.
Expert Rev Vaccines ; 21(7): 975-982, 2022 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35389748

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Consolidated information on the effectiveness of COVID-19 booster vaccination in Europe are scarce. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We assessed the effectiveness of a booster dose of an mRNA vaccine against any SARS-CoV-2 infection (symptomatic or asymptomatic) and severe COVID-19 (hospitalization or death) after over two months from administration among priority target groups (n = 18,524,568) during predominant circulation of the Delta variant in Italy (July-December 2021). RESULTS: Vaccine effectiveness (VE) against SARS-CoV-2 infection and, to a lesser extent, against severe COVID-19, among people ≥60 years and other high-risk groups (i.e. healthcare workers, residents in long-term-care facilities, and persons with comorbidities or immunocompromised), peaked in the time-interval 3-13 weeks (VE against infection = 67.2%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 62.5-71.3; VE against severe disease = 89.5%, 95% CI: 86.1-92.0) and then declined, waning 26 weeks after full primary vaccination (VE against infection = 12.2%, 95% CI: -4.7-26.4; VE against severe disease = 65.3%, 95% CI: 50.3-75.8). After 3-10 weeks from the administration of a booster dose, VE against infection and severe disease increased to 76.1% (95% CI: 70.4-80.7) and 93.0% (95% CI: 90.2-95.0), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the ongoing vaccination campaign in Italy, where the administration of a booster dose four months after completion of primary vaccination is recommended.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunas Sintéticas , Vacunas de ARNm
7.
Int J Epidemiol ; 43(6): 1921-8, 2014 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25342252

RESUMEN

The international scientific literature reports no data on the prevalence and effectiveness of back protector devices (BPD). In Italy, no data have been collected on BPD because their use is not mandatory. To fill this gap, the National Institute of Health implemented a cross-sectional study in collaboration with the National Traffic Police.Accident cases were collected from 1 December 2011 to 25 October 2013. Overall, data from 2104 accidents involving 2319 injured subjects were analysed: 1821 (78.5%) of these were motorcyclists and 498 (21.5%) mopedists. The use of Hard-shell BPD or jackets with airbags in motorcyclists is higher then in moped drivers (16.2% vs 1.3%,P»0.000). Concerning level of protection, there are no differences between drivers and passengers. In most severely injured motorcyclists (i.e. hospitalized or deceased), the percentage of injuries to the spine was lower (13.6%) among those who used a high level safety device (hard-shell BPD and/or airbags) and rose to 27.3% among those who used only protective clothing (P»0.022). When the variables potentially affecting the results of not using a high-safety device were controlled, a bivariate analysis showed that the odds of serious spinal injury were 2.72 times greater (P»0.049) and a multivariate analysis showed that they were 2.81 times greater (P»0.012). This study points out that greater use of BPD could reduce the number of injuries to the spinal column resulting from road traffic accidents involving motorized two-wheeled vehicles.


Asunto(s)
Accidentes de Tránsito , Motocicletas , Equipos de Seguridad/estadística & datos numéricos , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/epidemiología , Traumatismos Vertebrales/epidemiología , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ropa de Protección/estadística & datos numéricos , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/prevención & control , Traumatismos Vertebrales/prevención & control , Índices de Gravedad del Trauma
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda