RESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The treatment of Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) has evolved over the past decade. With the seminal discoveries of MYD88 and CXCR warts, hypogammaglobulinemia, infections, and myelokathexis (WHIM) mutations in WM cells, our understanding of the disease biology and treatment has improved. The development of a new class of agents, Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi), has substantially impacted the treatment paradigm of WM. Herein, we review the current and emerging BTKi and the evidence for their use in WM. RECENT FINDINGS: Clinical trials have established the role of covalent BTKi in the treatment of WM. Their efficacy is compromised among patients who harbor CXCR4WHIM mutation or MYD88WT genotype. The development of BTKC481 mutation-mediated resistance to covalent BTKi may lead to disease refractoriness. Novel, non-covalent, next-generation BTKi are emerging, and preliminary results of the early phase clinical trials show promising activity in WM, even among patients refractory to a covalent BTKi. Covalent BTK inhibitors have demonstrated meaningful outcomes in treatment-naïve (TN) and relapsed refractory (R/R) WM, particularly among those harboring the MYD88L265P mutation. The next-generation BTKi demonstrate improved selectivity, resulting in a more favorable toxicity profile. In WM, BTKi are administered until progression or the development of intolerable toxicity. Consequently, the potential for acquired resistance, the emergence of cumulative toxicities, and treatment-related financial burden are critical challenges associated with the continuous therapy approach. By circumventing BTK C481 mutations that alter the binding site to covalent BTKi, the non-covalent BTKi serve as alternative agents in the event of acquired resistance. Head-to-head comparative trials with the conventional chemoimmunotherapies are lacking. The findings of the RAINBOW trial (NCT046152), comparing the dexamethasone, rituximab, and cyclophosphamide (DRC) regimen to the first-generation, ibrutinib are awaited, but more studies are needed to draw definitive conclusions on the comparative efficacy of chemoimmunotherapy and BTKi. Complete response is elusive with BTKi, and combination regimens to improve upon the efficacy and limit the treatment duration are also under evaluation in WM.
Asunto(s)
Agammaglobulinemia Tirosina Quinasa , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas , Macroglobulinemia de Waldenström , Macroglobulinemia de Waldenström/tratamiento farmacológico , Macroglobulinemia de Waldenström/genética , Humanos , Agammaglobulinemia Tirosina Quinasa/antagonistas & inhibidores , Agammaglobulinemia Tirosina Quinasa/genética , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Mutación , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Over the last two decades, the frontline therapy for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) has evolved. However, the impact of subsequent lines of therapy on survival outcomes has not been well characterized. In this study, we investigated the treatment patterns and survival outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) MCL treated with second-line (2 L) therapy. Adult patients with newly diagnosed MCL from 2002 to 2015 were enrolled in a prospective cohort study. Clinical characteristics, 2 L treatment details, and outcomes were compared between patients who received 2 L treatment between 2003-2009 (Era 1), 2010-2014 (Era 2), and 2015-2021 (Era 3). 2 L treatment was heterogenous in all eras, and there was a substantial shift in the pattern of 2 L therapy over time. The estimated 2-year EFS rate was 21% (95% CI, 13-35), 40% (95% CI, 30-53), and 51% (95% CI, 37-68) in Era 1-3 respectively, and the 5-year OS rate was 31% (95% CI, 21-45), 37% (95% CI, 27-50), and 67% (95% CI, 54-83) in Era 1-3, respectively. These results provide real-world evidence on evolving treatment patterns of 2 L therapy based on the era of relapse. The changes in 2 L treatment correlated with improved EFS and OS, suggesting that treatment advances are associated with improved outcomes in patients with R/R MCL.
Asunto(s)
Linfoma de Células del Manto , Adulto , Humanos , Linfoma de Células del Manto/patología , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is a premalignant state for a spectrum of lymphoplasmacytic malignancies. The risk of progression of MGUS to a symptomatic therapy requiring plasma cell dyscrasia is about 1% per year. Studies carried out over the previous 10 years have improved risk stratification of MGUS based on serologic and genomic evaluations, which has led to better management of patients. In this review, we address the epidemiology, diagnosis, and pathogenesis of MGUS and discuss risk-adapted best practice approaches to monitor patients.