RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Gait and mobility impairment are pivotal signs of parkinsonism, and they are particularly severe in atypical parkinsonian disorders including multiple system atrophy (MSA) and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). A pilot study demonstrated a significant improvement of gait in patients with MSA of parkinsonian type (MSA-P) after physiotherapy and matching home-based exercise, as reflected by sensor-based gait parameters. In this study, we aim to investigate whether a gait-focused physiotherapy (GPT) and matching home-based exercise lead to a greater improvement of gait performance compared with a standard physiotherapy/home-based exercise programme (standard physiotherapy, SPT). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol was deployed to evaluate the effects of a GPT versus an active control undergoing SPT and matching home-based exercise with regard to laboratory gait parameters, physical activity measures and clinical scales in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), MSA-P and PSP. The primary outcomes of the trial are sensor-based laboratory gait parameters, while the secondary outcome measures comprise real-world derived parameters, clinical rating scales and patient questionnaires. We aim to enrol 48 patients per disease group into this double-blind, randomised-controlled trial. The study starts with a 1 week wearable sensor-based monitoring of physical activity. After randomisation, patients undergo a 2 week daily inpatient physiotherapy, followed by 5 week matching unsupervised home-based training. A 1 week physical activity monitoring is repeated during the last week of intervention. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study, registered as 'Mobility in Atypical Parkinsonism: a Trial of Physiotherapy (Mobility_APP)' at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04608604), received ethics approval by local committees of the involved centres. The patient's recruitment takes place at the Movement Disorders Units of Innsbruck (Austria), Erlangen (Germany), Lausanne (Switzerland), Luxembourg (Luxembourg) and Bolzano (Italy). The data resulting from this project will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals, presented at international congresses and made publicly available at the end of the trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04608604.
Asunto(s)
Terapia por Ejercicio , Trastornos Parkinsonianos , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Humanos , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Trastornos Parkinsonianos/rehabilitación , Trastornos Parkinsonianos/terapia , Método Doble Ciego , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Marcha , Enfermedad de Parkinson/rehabilitación , Enfermedad de Parkinson/terapia , Atrofia de Múltiples Sistemas/rehabilitación , Atrofia de Múltiples Sistemas/terapia , Parálisis Supranuclear Progresiva/terapia , Parálisis Supranuclear Progresiva/rehabilitación , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio , Anciano , Masculino , Femenino , Trastornos Neurológicos de la Marcha/rehabilitación , Trastornos Neurológicos de la Marcha/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Functional motor disorders (FMD) are a frequent neurological condition affecting patients with movement disorders. Commonly described in younger adults, their manifestation can be also associated to an elderly onset. OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence and describe the clinical manifestations of FMD with elderly and younger onset and their relationship with demographical and clinical variables. METHODS: We recruited patients with a "clinically definite" diagnosis of FMD from the Italian Registry of FMD. Patients underwent extensive clinical assessments. For elderly onset, we set a chronological cut-off at 65 years or older according to WHO definition. Multivariate regression models were implemented to estimate adjusted odds ratio of elderly FMD onset related to clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Among the 410 patients, 34 (8.2%) experienced elderly-onset FMD, with a mean age at onset of 70.9 years. The most common phenotype was tremor (47.1%), followed by gait disorders, weakness, and dystonia (29.4%, 23.5%, 14.7%, respectively). Eleven elderly patients had a combined phenomenology: 9 exhibited two phenotypes, 2 had three phenotypes. Weakness was isolated in 3/8 patients and combined with another phenotype in 5/8, manifesting as paraplegia (n = 4); upper limb diplegia (n = 2), hemiparesis/hemiplegia (n = 1), and tetraparesis/tetraplegia (n= 1). Non-motor and other functional neurological disorders occurred more frequently in the younger group (89.1%) than the elderly (73.5%). Neurological and non-neurological comorbidities were more prevalent in the elderly group (82.4%) as opposed to the younger (32.7%). In a multivariate regression analysis, elderly-onset FMD was significantly associated with neurological comorbidities, including parkinsonism (OR 6.73) and cerebrovascular diseases (OR 5.48). CONCLUSIONS: These results highlight the importance of achieving an accurate diagnosis of FMD in the elderly, as it is crucial for effectively managing FMD symptoms and addressing neurological comorbidities.