Effects of dietary fat modification on skeletal muscle fatty acid handling in the metabolic syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: In the metabolic syndrome (MetS), increased fat storage in 'nonadipose' tissues such as skeletal muscle may be related to insulin resistance ('lipid overflow' hypothesis). The objective of this study was to examine the effects of dietary fat modification on the capacity of skeletal muscle to handle dietary and endogenous fatty acids (FAs). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In total, 29 men with the MetS were randomly assigned to one of four diets for 12 weeks: a high-fat saturated fat diet (HSFA, n=6), a high-fat monounsaturated fat diet (HMUFA, n=7) and two low-fat high-complex carbohydrate diets supplemented with (LFHCCn-3, n=8) or without (LFHCC, n=8) 1.24 g per day docosahexaenoic and eicosapentaenoic acid. Fasting and postprandial skeletal muscle FA handling was examined by measuring arteriovenous concentration differences across the forearm muscle. [(2)H(2)]-palmitate was infused intravenously to label endogenous triacylglycerol (TAG) and free fatty acids in the circulation and subjects received a high-fat mixed meal (2.6 MJ, 61 energy% fat) containing [U-(13)C]-palmitate to label chylomicron-TAG. RESULTS: Postprandial circulating TAG concentrations were significantly lower after dietary intervention in the LFHCCn-3 group compared to the HSFA group (DeltaiAUC -139+/-67 vs 167+/-70 micromol l(-1) min(-1), P=0.009), together with decreased concentrations of [U-(13)C]-labeled TAG, representing dietary FA. Fasting TAG clearance across forearm muscle was decreased on the HSFA diet, whereas no differences were observed in postprandial forearm muscle FA handling between diets. CONCLUSION: Chronic manipulation of dietary fat quantity and quality did not affect forearm muscle FA handling in men with the MetS. Postprandial TAG concentrations decreased on the LFHCCn-3 diet, which could be (partly) explained by lower concentration of dietary FA in the circulation.

Recipient hemodynamics during non-heart-beating donor kidney transplantation are major predictors of primary nonfunction.

Non-heart-beating donor (NHBD) kidneys may substantially expand the donor pool, but many transplant centers are reluctant to use these kidneys because of the relatively high incidence of primary nonfunction (PNF). In heart-beating donor kidneys, intravascular fluid depletion during transplant surgery is associated with delayed graft function (DGF). Therefore, we studied the effect of the recipients' hemodynamic status on the outcome of 177 NHBD kidney transplantations. Independent statistically significant predictors of PNF were average central venous pressure (CVP) below 6 cmH(2)O (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 3.1 (95% CI: 1.4-7.1), p=0.007), average systolic blood pressure below 110 mmHg (AOR 2.6 (95% CI: 1.1-5.9), p=0.03) and pre-operative diastolic blood pressure below 80 mmHg (AOR 2.4 (95% CI: 1.0-5.9), p=0.05). Donor characteristics were not independently associated with PNF (p>0.10). In a subgroup analysis of 56 paired kidneys, 29% of the recipients with the lower CVP of the pair experienced PNF compared with 11% of their counterparts with higher CVP (p=0.09). Our study indicates that recipient hemodynamics during transplant surgery are major predictors of PNF. Therefore, improving recipient hemodynamics by expansion of the intravascular volume is expected to enhance the results of NHBD kidney transplantations and may enlarge the donor pool by increasing the acceptance of NHBD kidneys.

Continuous infusions of alfentanil and propofol for coronary artery surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To study the anesthetic efficacy of two different background infusion rates for alfentanil in a total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) technique using propofol. Therefore, the effects of these infusions on hemodynamic stability and on the suppression of hemodynamic and somatic responses to noxious stimuli were compared. DESIGN: Prospective and randomized. SETTING: The study was performed in a university hospital setting. Two patient groups were compared. INTERVENTIONS: Anesthesia was induced in group 1 (n = 16) with alfentanil 50 micrograms/kg and in group 2 (n = 14) with alfentanil 75 micrograms/kg, infused in 4 min, as well as with an infusion of propofol at a rate of 10 mg/kg/h in both groups. After 4 min, the alfentanil infusion was reduced to 1 microgram/kg/min in group 1 and to 2 micrograms/kg/min in group 2. The propofol infusion was reduced following sternal spread to 3 mg/kg/h. Responses indicating inadequate anesthesia were treated with additional alfentanil bolus doses. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Induction of anesthesia in group 1 was associated with significant decreases in systolic and diastolic (-13%) blood pressures, cardiac index (-16%) and left ventricular stroke work index (-31%). Hemodynamic changes were similar in group 2, except for the greater fall in systemic vascular resistance during maintenance of anesthesia. There was no difference in the incidence of breakthrough hypertension between the two groups (in 44% and 43% of the patients, respectively) and in the number of alfentanil bolus supplements. There were also no differences in the incidence of ischemia, myocardial infarction or duration of postoperative ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: Because both infusions provided equally stable anesthesia, the lower infusion regimen for alfentanil is the more appropriate technique. Using this technique, the administration of additional alfentanil boluses just before stressful surgical episodes will further improve hemodynamic stability.