Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País como asunto
Tipo del documento
Publication year range
1.
BMJ Open ; 8(12): e024489, 2018 12 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30530588

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Some studies have reported increasing trends in certain brain tumours and a possible link with mobile phone use has been suggested. We examined the incidence time trends of brain tumour in Australia for three distinct time periods to ascertain the influence of improved diagnostic technologies and increase in mobile phone use on the incidence of brain tumours. DESIGN: In a population-based ecological study, we examined trends of brain tumour over the periods 1982-1992, 1993-2002 and 2003-2013. We further compared the observed incidence during the period of substantial mobile phone use (2003-2013) with predicted (modelled) incidence for the same period by applying various relative risks, latency periods and mobile phone use scenarios. SETTING: National Australian incidence registration data on primary cancers of the brain diagnosed between 1982 and 2013. POPULATION: 16 825 eligible brain cancer cases aged 20-59 from all of Australia (10 083 males and 6742 females). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Annual percentage change (APC) in brain tumour incidence based on Poisson regression analysis. RESULTS: The overall brain tumour rates remained stable during all three periods. There was an increase in glioblastoma during 1993-2002 (APC 2.3, 95% CI 0.8 to 3.7) which was likely due to advances in the use of MRI during that period. There were no increases in any brain tumour types, including glioma (-0.6, -1.4 to 0.2) and glioblastoma (0.8, -0.4 to 2.0), during the period of substantial mobile phone use from 2003 to 2013. During that period, there was also no increase in glioma of the temporal lobe (0.5, -1.3 to 2.3), which is the location most exposed when using a mobile phone. Predicted incidence rates were higher than the observed rates for latency periods up to 15 years. CONCLUSIONS: In Australia, there has been no increase in any brain tumour histological type or glioma location that can be attributed to mobile phones.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Encéfalo , Uso del Teléfono Celular , Adulto , Australia/epidemiología , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Encéfalo/patología , Neoplasias Encefálicas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patología , Uso del Teléfono Celular/estadística & datos numéricos , Uso del Teléfono Celular/tendencias , Femenino , Glioblastoma/epidemiología , Glioblastoma/patología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo
2.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 175(4): 432-439, 2017 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28074013

RESUMEN

The increasing use of Wi-Fi in schools and other places has given rise to public concern that the radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic fields from Wi-Fi have the potential to adversely affect children. The current study measured typical and peak RF levels from Wi-Fi and other sources in 23 schools in Australia. All of the RF measurements were much lower than the reference levels recommended by international guidelines for protection against established health effects. The typical and peak RF levels from Wi-Fi in locations occupied by children in the classroom were of the order of 10-4 and 10-2% of the exposure guidelines, respectively. Typical RF levels in the classroom were similar between Wi-Fi and radio but higher than other sources. In the schoolyard typical RF levels were higher for radio, TV and mobile phone base stations compared to Wi-Fi. The results of this study showed that the typical RF exposure of children from Wi-Fi at school is very low and comparable or lower to other sources in the environment.


Asunto(s)
Campos Electromagnéticos , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales , Ondas de Radio , Instituciones Académicas , Australia , Teléfono Celular , Niño , Humanos
3.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 178(2): 242-244, 2018 01 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28985415
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda