Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Int Ophthalmol ; 40(12): 3377-3391, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32776301

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To compare three-year surgical outcomes of trabeculectomy versus Ahmed valves in patients with prior failed trabeculectomy. METHODS: This is a longitudinal retrospective comparative study of one-hundred twenty adult patients with prior failed trabeculectomy who underwent a repeat trabeculectomy or Ahmed valve implant. Demographic and clinical data were collected up to 3 years on all study participants at the Kresge Eye Institute from 2004 to 2016. Visual acuity, intraocular pressure, number of intraocular pressure reducing medications, and success rates at various time points up to 3 years after repeat surgery were the main outcome variables. RESULTS: Sixty-five and sixty eyes were included in the trabeculectomy and the Ahmed valve groups, respectively. Baseline intraocular pressure significantly decreased in both groups at 3 years (p < 0.01). The number of medications was relatively similar to baseline in both study groups at 3 years (p > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in visual acuity, percentage of intraocular pressure reduction, number of medications, or success rates at any follow-up time points (p > 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: After 3 years, both trabeculectomy and Ahmed valves significantly reduced intraocular pressure from baseline, but with relatively similar number of medications compared to baseline. There was no significant difference in any outcome measure between trabeculectomy and Ahmed valves at any follow-up time points. These results may suggest neither trabeculectomy or Ahmed valves are superior in patients with previously failed trabeculectomies.


Asunto(s)
Implantes de Drenaje de Glaucoma , Glaucoma , Trabeculectomía , Adulto , Estudios de Seguimiento , Glaucoma/cirugía , Humanos , Presión Intraocular , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Optom Vis Sci ; 96(7): 492-499, 2019 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31274737

RESUMEN

SIGNIFICANCE: Determining risk factors for posterior capsule opacification will allow for further interventions to reduce the risk of development and thus additional procedures. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate risk factors associated with development of clinically significant posterior capsule opacification requiring yttrium aluminum garnet (YAG) capsulotomy. METHODS: Medical records of patients (≥18 years) who underwent cataract surgery between January 1, 2011, and March 31, 2014, at Kresge Eye Institute were reviewed. Three hundred eyes requiring YAG capsulotomy up to 3 years after cataract surgery were included in the YAG capsulotomy group. Three hundred eyes not requiring YAG capsulotomy up to 3 years after cataract surgery were selected via age-matched simple randomization (control group). RESULTS: The YAG capsulotomy group included patients with younger age (65.8 ± 11.3 vs. 70.1 ± 10.6 years, P < .001), more men (42.67 vs. 34.67%, P = .04), fewer patients with hypertension (73.00 vs. 83.00%, P < .001), and more patients with hydrophilic intraocular lenses (74.67 vs. 47.00%, P < .001). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated a negative association between YAG capsulotomy and age (coefficient, -0.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.95 to 0.98; P < .001) and hydrophobic intraocular lenses (coefficient, -1.50; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.33; P < .001), and a positive association with presence of glaucoma (coefficient, 0.88; 95% CI, 1.39 to 4.17; P = .002). Elapsed time to YAG capsulotomy was sooner in patients with a history of uveitis (95% CI, 5.10 to 9.70 months; P = .02) and insertion of hydrophilic intraocular lenses (95% CI, 18.67 to 21.57 months; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study suggest that development of visually significant posterior capsule opacification is associated with younger age, glaucoma, and hydrophilic intraocular lenses, and it occurs earlier among those with hydrophilic intraocular lenses and a history of uveitis.


Asunto(s)
Opacificación Capsular/cirugía , Láseres de Estado Sólido/uso terapéutico , Cápsula Posterior del Cristalino/cirugía , Capsulotomía Posterior/métodos , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Opacificación Capsular/etiología , Extracción de Catarata , Femenino , Humanos , Lentes Intraoculares/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
3.
J Curr Glaucoma Pract ; 16(1): 36-40, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36060042

RESUMEN

Aim: "Consensual ophthalmotonic reaction" refers to changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) in one eye, which is accompanied by a corresponding change in IOP in the contralateral eye. This study evaluates whether monocular administration of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) leads to a consensual ophthalmotonic reaction and how long this effect lasts. Materials and methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on patients receiving SLT at Kresge Eye Institute in Detroit, MI, from January 2015 to August 2016. Patients were excluded if they had previous history of glaucoma incisional and/or laser procedures; required additional laser trabeculoplasty; had glaucoma medication changes during the follow-up period; experienced no decrease in IOP during the follow-up period; or had a diagnosis of angle closure on gonioscopy. Various demographic, clinical, and surgical data were collected. IOP measurements were collected at baseline and postoperatively at 1-3 months, 4-9 months, and 12-15 months. Results: At all follow-up periods, the IOP of the treated eye was decreased from baseline IOP (p ≤ 0.05, paired t-test). For the fellow eye, there was a statistically significantly decrease from baseline up to the 4-9 months follow-up period (p ≤ 0.05, paired t-test). Linear regression analysis of the percent reduction in IOP from baseline in the SLT-treated eye with the fellow eye shows a mild correlation at all-time points: R2 = 0.284 (p < 0.001) at 1-3 months; R2 = 0.348 (p < 0.001) at 4-9 months; R2 = 0.118 (p = 0.054) at 12-15 months. Conclusion: This study showed that monocular administration of SLT results in a consensual ophthalmotonic reaction. The consensual ophthalmotonic reaction appears to last for up to 4-9 months. Clinical significance: Therefore, although SLT does lead to a consensual ophthalmotonic reaction, monocular administration of SLT is not a reliable method of long-term IOP control for the contralateral non-SLT-treated eye. How to cite this article: Nassiri N, Mei F, Tokko H, et al. Consensual Ophthalmotonic Reaction Following Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2022;16(1):36-40.

4.
Can J Ophthalmol ; 54(3): 388-394, 2019 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31109481

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of 2 dosing regimens of loteprednol etabonate (LE) ophthalmic gel 0.5% and bromfenac ophthalmic solution 0.07% in patients undergoing routine cataract surgery. DESIGN: Six-week prospective, masked, randomized controlled noninferiority study. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred eyes. METHODS: Patients undergoing uncomplicated cataract surgery were selected in a consecutive manner. Patients were randomized to one of 2 groups: LE QID + qD bromfenac (control group) versus LE BID + qD bromfenac (study group). Primary outcome metrics included summed ocular inflammation score (SOIS) and adverse events. Secondary outcome measures included intraocular pressure, visual acuity, central retinal thickness, and subjective symptomology scores measured at 4 study visits. The final visit included a questionnaire addressing compliance, satisfaction, and comfort with the medications. RESULTS: Both groups demonstrated similar effectiveness and safety between dosing regimens. No statistically significant difference was reported between groups regarding SOIS (visit 1 p = N/A, visit 2 p = 0.66, visit 3 p = 0.60, visit 4 p = 0.08). No adverse events were reported relating to the difference in study regimen. A statistically significant difference was not found regarding secondary outcomes (p > 0.05). Control group patients reported a more difficult time remembering their doses for bromfenac but not LE (bromfenac p < 0.05; LE p = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that both groups had similar outcomes with respect to control of ocular inflammation with no differences in adverse outcomes. The compliance questionnaire also suggests a patient preference for the dosing regimen with lower frequency of drop application.


Asunto(s)
Benzofenonas/administración & dosificación , Bromobencenos/administración & dosificación , Extracción de Catarata/métodos , Etabonato de Loteprednol/administración & dosificación , Satisfacción del Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Anciano , Antialérgicos/administración & dosificación , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Presión Intraocular , Periodo Intraoperatorio , Masculino , Soluciones Oftálmicas/administración & dosificación , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Agudeza Visual
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda