Controlled Versus Uncontrolled Resistant Hypertension: Are They in the Same Bag?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Resistant hypertension (RHTN) is a condition in which besides the antihypertensive therapy using at least three different drugs (including a diuretics), brachial blood pressure does not reach the target (e.g., 140/90 mmHg). RECENT FINDINGS: Despite the diversity of clinical presentations, we divide RHTN in two major groups according to blood pressure and number of drugs taken: controlled (C-RHTN) and uncontrolled (UC-RHTN) resistant hypertension, with refractory hypertension (RfHTN) included in the latter subgroup. Both C-RHTN and UC-RHTN are heterogenic and complex syndromes. To better approach this matter, the some pathophysiological mechanisms (increased volemia, hyperactivity, plasma cortisol, adipocitokines, and other pro-inflammatory factors), have a pivotal clinical role. Some features (African ethnic, obesity, age > 60, LV hypertrophy, and vascular stiffness) increase the risk of refractoriness as well as worst prognosis. Based on increased target organ damage, cardiovascular risk and events will be addressed in this review. Our conclusion is that although both C-RHTN and UC-RHTN are extreme phenotypes of hard-to-control BP, some mechanisms of the disease and clinical expressions are distinct. According to these differences, "UC-RHTN and C-RHTN are not in the same bag."

Transdermal nicotine mimics the smoking-induced endothelial dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Cigarette smoking is a major risk factor for coronary artery disease and causes endothelial dysfunction, perhaps by decreasing the availability of nitric oxide availability in arteries and veins. Nicotine in cigarette smoke may be responsible for this impaired endothelial response. METHODS: We studied nine healthy nonsmokers and 12 healthy mild to moderate smokers by use of the dorsal hand vein compliance technique. Dose-response curves to bradykinin and sodium nitroprusside were obtained to test the endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent vasorelaxation before and during the use of a nicotine (21 mg) patch. Mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate were measured beat-to-beat during the 4-hour study and serial blood samples were drawn to assay plasma thromboxane B2 levels. RESULTS: Transdermal nicotine reduced the venous responsiveness to bradykinin in nonsmokers (Emax = 88.0% +/- 17.9% and 54.3% +/- 14.9%, respectively, before and after the nicotine patch; P < .05); the latter response was similar to that in smokers (Emax = 56.3% +/- 16.6%). Sodium nitroprusside-induced venodilation was unaltered. Mean arterial blood pressure increased in both smokers and nonsmokers. Transdermal nicotine increased the plasma thromboxane B2 concentrations only among nonsmokers. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that nicotine can have a major role in the impaired endothelial function in smokers. The results probably also reflect what occurs in arterial beds because the nicotine patches increased the mean arterial blood pressure in both smokers and nonsmokers.

Cardiovascular effects of transdermal nicotine in mildly hypertensive smokers.

Smoking potentiates the enhanced cardiovascular risk of hypertensive patients. Although nicotine replacement therapy is safe when used by healthy individuals to quit smoking, there is no evidence that nicotine replacement therapy is safe in hypertensive smokers. In this crossover, single-blinded, placebo-controlled study, we compared for 4 h the acute effects of transdermal nicotine on the mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) of mildly hypertensive smokers treated with hydrochlorothiazide with the responses in normotensive smokers and nonsmokers monitored with Finapres and ambulatory blood pressure systems. The plasma concentrations of thromboxane B2 (TXB2, the stable breakdown product of TXA2) were also measured by ELISA to assess whether transdermal nicotine acutely affects TXA2 production. The use of 21-mg nicotine patches increased the MAP and HR in nonsmokers (from 94+/-4 mm Hg and 69+/-3 beats/min to 117+/-7 mm Hg and 83+/-3 beats/min, respectively; P < .05) as well as the MAP in normotensive smokers (from 83+/-4 to 106+/-7 mm Hg; P < .05). However, MAP and HR remained unaltered in hypertensive smokers after transdermal nicotine. Higher basal TXB2 levels were observed in hypertensive smokers compared with normotensive smokers and nonsmokers (2019+/-402 v 670+/-167 and 556+/-68 pg/mL, respectively; P < .05). Transdermal nicotine increased the TXB2 levels only in nonsmokers (P < .05). These data indicate that the use of transdermal nicotine in mildly hypertensive smokers is probably safe. Further studies involving other classes of hypertensive patients are warranted.

Nucleotide sequence of the methoxyneurosporene dehydrogenase gene from Rhodobacter sphaeroides: comparison with other bacterial carotenoid dehydrogenases.

The nucleotide sequence of the 1794-bp fragment containing the crtD gene from Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1 encoding for methoxyneurosporene dehydrogenase has been determined. A 63% sequence identity was found when compared with the nucleotide sequence of the crtD gene from Rhodobacter capsulatus. A putative regulatory palindromic motif present in the crtD gene from R. capsulatus also exists in this gene from R. sphaeroides. The translated open reading frame of the crtD gene of R. sphaeroides has identified a polypeptide of 495 amino acids which shares a 56% sequence identity with the same CrtD protein of R. capsulatus. The N- and C-termini of these CrtD proteins present a high degree of similarity with the N- and C-termini of other carotenoid dehydrogenases including those encoded by crtI genes. This is in good agreement with the previously hypothesized homology between CrtI and CrtD proteins.

Acute administration of nicotine impairs the hypotensive responses to bradykinin in rats.

Nicotine may contribute to smoking-induced endothelial dysfunction because of its ability to impair endothelium-dependent vasodilatation. We investigated whether the acute administration of nicotine changes the hypotensive responses to bradykinin in rats. The effects of pre-treatment with losartan or enalapril on the nicotine-induced changes in the responses to bradykinin were also evaluated. In study 1, anesthetized rats were cannulated via carotid artery for the measurement of mean arterial pressure. Dose-response curves to bradykinin (0.1, 0.4, 1.6, 6.4, 25 and 100 microg/kg) were generated before and 10 min after the injection of nicotine (200 microg/kg, i.v.) or saline. The individual dose-response curves were fitted to a four-parameter logistic equation using the ALLFIT program, which provided an estimate of the maximal response (E(max)) and of the dose of bradykinin producing the half-maximal response (ED(50)). In study 2, rats were pre-treated orally with losartan (10 mg/kg/day) or enalapril maleate (25 mg/kg/day) for 2 weeks. Control rats received tap water alone. After pre-treatment, the rats were anesthetized and used as described in study 1. Nicotine decreased the E(max) (from 73.0+/-7.5 to 65.7+/-3.3 mm Hg; P<0.05) but did not affect the ED(50). In study 2, losartan or enalapril did not affect nicotine-induced decrease in responses to bradykinin; E(max) decreased in both groups (from 68.7+/-6.3 to 62.8+/-4.2 mm Hg, and from 53.8+/-13.0 to 43.1+/-7.1 mm Hg, respectively; P<0.05) without significantly changing the ED(50). These results suggest that nicotine impairs the endothelium-dependent hypotensive responses to bradykinin. This effect is not influenced by inhibition of the angiotensin-converting enzyme or by blockade of the angiotensin AT(1) receptors.

Characteristics of resistant hypertension: ageing, body mass index, hyperaldosteronism, cardiac hypertrophy and vascular stiffness.

Resistant hypertension (RHTN) includes patients whose blood pressure (BP) is controlled with the use of four or more antihypertensive medications, and is referred to as 'controlled resistant hypertension' (CRH). While specifically comparing patients with CRH and uncontrolled resistant hypertension (UCRH), we hoped to identify distinguishing characteristics that would provide insight into factors contributing to resistance to antihypertensive therapies. RHTN patients were identified as controlled (CRH, n=43) or uncontrolled (UCRH, n=47). No statistical differences were observed between the CRH and UCRH subgroups with respect to age and gender. The body mass index, aldosterone-renin ratio and pulse wave velocity (PWV) were significantly higher in UCRH patients. Although both subgroups showed increased cardiac mass, left ventricular mass index was significantly higher in UCRH compared with CRH patients. Multivariate linear regression analysis indicated that PWV was significantly dependent on age in both UCRH and CRH patients; however, the influence of ageing was more pronounced in the former subgroup. Older age, greater vascular stiffness, higher aldosterone levels and greater left ventricular hypertrophy were significantly associated with lack of BP control in patients with RHTN. These findings suggest important possibilities in terms of preventing and better treating RHTN.

Non-dipping pattern relates to endothelial dysfunction in patients with uncontrolled resistant hypertension.

Resistant hypertension (RHTN) includes both patients whose blood pressure (BP) is uncontrolled on three or more medications (uncontrolled RHTN (UCRH)) and patients whose BP is controlled with use of four or more drugs (controlled RHTN (CRH)). It is unknown whether endothelial function and nocturnal drop demonstrate a similar pattern in patients with CRH and UCRH. We examined circadian BP patterns and vascular function in these patients. In all, 40 CRH and 26 UCRH patients, and 25 normotensives underwent biochemical testing, ambulatory BP monitoring, determination of brachial artery responses to endothelial-dependent (flow-mediated; dilation (FMD)) and independent (nitroglycerin mediated) stimuli. The nighttime drop in systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) was less pronounced in UCRH than in CRH (SBP, 1.9±1.6 versus 4.9±1.7%; DBP, 7.5±1.8 versus 10.9±1.8%, UCRH and CRH, respectively; P<0.05). FMD was greater in control group compared with RHTN patients. Patients with UCRH had significantly impaired FMD compared with CRH (5.9±2.3% versus 7.1±5.1%; P<0.0001). Therefore, UCRH patients have less nocturnal dipping and a more impaired endothelial response compared with CRH patients. These findings suggest that important differences among patients with RHTN may allow identify subgroups with increased cardiovascular risk.

Caracterización clínica y adhesión farmacológica de individuos con hipertensión arterial refractaria / Clinical characterization and drug adherence of subjects with refractory high blood pressure

No disponible

No disponible