Clinical outcomes and factors involved in the local control of proton beam therapy for oligometastatic liver tumors in patients with colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There are no existing reports on proton beam therapy (PBT) for local control (LC) of liver metastasis of colorectal cancer (LMCRC). We calculated the LC rate of PBT for LMCRC and explored the influence of each factor on the LC rate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cases in which PBT was performed at our center between 2009 and 2018 were retrospectively selected from the database. Patients with LMCRC without extrahepatic lesions and no more than three liver metastases were included. Effectiveness was assessed based on LC, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) rates. Adverse events (AEs) are described. Factors that may be related to LC were also investigated. RESULTS: This study included 23 men and 18 women, with a median age of 66 (range 24-87) years. A total of 63 lesions were included in the study. The most frequent dose was 72.6 Gy (relative biological effectiveness)/22 fractions. The median follow-up period was 27.6 months. The 3­year LC, OS, and PFS rates were 54.9%, 61.6%, and 16.7%, respectively. Our multivariate analysis identified the distance between the tumor and the gastrointestinal (GI) tract as a factor associated with LC (P = 0.02). No grade ≥ 3 AEs were observed. None of the patients experienced liver failure during the acute or late phase. CONCLUSION: Care must be taken with tumors that have reduced planning target volume coverage owing to organs at risk restrictions, especially in tumors near the GI tract.

Safety of hydrogel spacers for rectal wall protection in patients with prostate cancer: A retrospective analysis of 200 consecutive cases.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and complications of hydrogel spacer implantation. METHODS: This single-center historical cohort study retrospectively analyzed cases of hydrogel spacer implantation between October 2018 and March 2022. The survey items were the rates of possible hydrogel injection implementation, the success rate of hydrogel implantation including asymmetry, higher position, rectal wall infiltration, subcapsular injection, and other adverse events, and width created by the spacer. To investigate the learning curve, 1, 2, and 3 points were assigned to adverse event grades G1, G2, and G3, respectively. Spacer effectiveness obstruction, such as asymmetry was assigned 3 points. A Mann-Whitney U test was performed to assess statistically significant differences. RESULTS: The study included a total of 200 patients with a median (range) age of 70 (44-85) years. In 10 (5%) patients, hydrogel injection implementation was not possible. Of 190 patients who underwent hydrogel spacer placement, 168 (88%) received a satisfactory placement. The median (range) width of hydrogel spacers was 13.1 (4.4-18.7) mm. Spacer asymmetry, higher position, rectal wall infiltration, and prostate subcapsular infiltration occurred in 7 (3.7%), 5 (2.6%), 12 (6.3%), and 1 (0.5%) patients, respectively. G1 and G3 adverse events occurred in 13 (7%) and 4 (2%) patients, respectively. Practitioner #1 who performed the highest number of procedures had significantly (p = 0.04) lower total scores in group B. CONCLUSION: Spacer implantation yielded favorable outcomes with a high percentage of appropriate spacer implantation, and few major complications.

Effectiveness of proton beam therapy for liver oligometastatic recurrence in patients with postoperative esophagus cancer.

There are several reports of hepatic resection for postoperative hepatic metastatic recurrence of esophageal cancer. However, it is unclear whether surgery is the best local treatment for liver metastases. Thus, this study aimed to retrospectively analyze proton beam therapy (PBT) for postoperative liver metastatic recurrence of esophageal cancer without extrahepatic lesions and examine outcomes and adverse events. This single-center historical cohort study selected patients who underwent PBT at our proton therapy center between 2012 and 2018. The patients were selected based on the following criteria: primary esophagus carcinoma was resection and metachronous liver oligometastasis recurrence without extrahepatic tumors and no more than three liver metastases. This study included seven males with a median age of 66 (range, 58-78) years, and 15 lesions were included in the study. The median tumor size was 22.6 (7-55.3) mm. The most frequent dose was 72.6 Gy relative biological effect (RBE)/22 fractions (fr) for four lesions and 64 Gy (RBE)/8 fr for four lesions. The median survival time was 35.5 (13.2-119.4) months. The 1-, 2- and 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were 100%, 57.1% and 42.9%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) time was 8.7 (1.2-44.1) months. The 1-, 2- and 3-year PFS rates were 28.6%. The 1-, 2- and 3-year local control (LC) rates were 100%. No grade ≥4 radiation-induced adverse events (AEs) were observed. We conclude that PBT can be considered an alternative to hepatic resection for recurrent liver metastases postoperative esophageal cancer.

Outcomes and Prognostic Factors for Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer Treated With Proton Beam Therapy.

Purpose: Our objective was to report the outcome and prognostic factors for patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) treated with proton beam therapy (PBT) at our institution. Methods and Materials: The study included PBT-treated patients with LRRC between December 2008 and December 2019. Treatment response was stratified using an initial imaging test after PBT. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local control (LC) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Each outcome's prognostic factors were verified using the Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Twenty-three patients were enrolled (median follow-up, 37.4 months). There were 11 patients with complete response (CR) or complete metabolic response (CMR), 8 with partial response or partial metabolic response, 2 with stable disease or stable metabolic response, and 2 with progressive disease or progressive metabolic disease. Three- and 5-year OS, PFS, and LC were 72.1% and 44.6%, 37.9% and 37.9%, and 55.0% and 47.2%, respectively, with 54.4 months' median survival time. The maximum standardized uptake value of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography-computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) before PBT (cutoff value, 10) showed significant differences in OS (P = .03), PFS (P = .027), and LC (P = .012). The patients who achieved CR or CMR after PBT had significantly better LC than those with non-CR or non-CMR (hazard ratio, 4.49; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-17.63; P = .021). Older patients (aged ≥65 years) had significantly higher LC and PFS rates. Patients with pain before PBT and larger tumors (≥30 mm) also had significantly lower PFS. Of 23 patients, 12 (52%) experienced further local recurrence after PBT. One patient developed grade 2 acute radiation dermatitis. Regarding late toxicity, grade 4 late gastrointestinal toxic effects were recorded in 3 patients, in 2 of whom reirradiation was associated with further local recurrence after PBT. Conclusions: The results showed that PBT may have potential to be a good treatment option for LRRC. 18F-FDG-PET/CT before and after PBT may be useful for assessing tumor response and predicting outcomes.

Proton Beam Therapy With Space-Making Surgery (Omental Plombage) for Oligorecurrent Liver Metastasis of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Proton beam therapy (PBT) with space-making surgery has been used recently; however, its effectiveness for recurrent esophageal cancer (EC) is unclear. We herein report an unusual case of successful PBT with space-making surgery (omental plombage) for recurrent liver metastasis after EC surgery. A 58-year-old Japanese man underwent proximal gastrectomy for esophagogastric (EG) junction cancer seven months before presentation to our hospital. Microscopic findings after the surgery showed that the tumor was adenocarcinoma of the EG junction (pT1N0M0, stage I). Seven months after the proximal gastrectomy, liver metastases in S6 and S8 were revealed by positron emission tomography-computed tomography. Initial PBT was performed for those two liver metastases, and complete response (CR) was obtained for both liver metastases. Recurrence of liver metastasis in S2 was found eight months after the first PBT, and CR was achieved by chemotherapy. However, new liver metastasis recurred in S2. Considering the effects of radiation exposure on the surrounding gastrointestinal organs, we performed space-making surgery to place the omentum around the liver metastasis. We were able to complete the second PBT for the liver metastasis with 72.6 Gy relative biological effectiveness in 22 fractions. After the second PBT, the patient survived for seven years without recurrence. PBT with space-making surgery (omental plombage) for recurrent liver metastasis after EC surgery is considered to be a therapeutic option.

Recovery from acute pediatric complex regional pain syndrome type I after ankle sprain by early pharmacological and physical therapies in primary care: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS I) in children is a serious condition disrupting the family and school life of patients with the condition after it fully develops. It has been emphasized that early diagnosis is closely associated with earlier reduction of pain leading to preferable outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To report a case of acute CRPS I in a boy who was found to develop this condition by a routine visual analog scale (VAS) pain monitoring and who recovered from CRPS I at an early phase by prompt pharmacological, physical, and educational therapies. STUDY DESIGN: Case report. CASE REPORT: A 12-year-old boy sprained his left ankle while playing soccer and was referred to our clinic 4 days after the injury. At the first visit, he could walk, reporting motion pain with a VAS scale of 80 mm. On day 5, pain intensity increased to 100 mm, and a diagnosis of acute CRPS I was made. On day 7, he could not move the injured ankle; therefore celecoxib and pregabalin were administered, and physical and educational therapies started. On day 35, pain intensity was 0 mm and he could walk and run normally. CONCLUSION: Routine monitoring of VAS for every patient in pain is useful to discover an abnormal transition of VAS, enabling the early diagnosis of CRPS I. Inflammation and peripheral or central sensitization are postulated for early development of CRPS I. The present case suggested a combination of physical therapy and pharmacological intervention with celecoxib and pregabalin reduced peripheral and central sensitization.