Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
J Am Soc Nephrol ; 21(7): 1200-7, 2010 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20488956

RESUMEN

The frequency and outcome of recurrent lupus nephritis (RLN) among recipients of a kidney allograft vary among single-center reports. From the United Network for Organ Sharing files, we estimated the period prevalence and predictors of RLN in recipients who received a transplant between 1987 and 2006 and assessed the effects of RLN on allograft failure and recipients' survival. Among 6850 recipients of a kidney allograft with systemic lupus erythematosus, 167 recipients had RLN, 1770 experienced rejection, and 4913 control subjects did not experience rejection. The period prevalence of RLN was 2.44%. Non-Hispanic black race, female gender, and age <33 years each independently increased the odds of RLN. Graft failure occurred in 156 (93%) of those with RLN, 1517 (86%) of those with rejection, and 923 (19%) of control subjects without rejection. Although recipients with RLN had a fourfold greater risk for graft failure compared with control subjects without rejection, only 7% of graft failure episodes were attributable to RLN compared and 43% to rejection. During follow-up, 867 (13%) recipients died: 27 (16%) in the RLN group, 313 (18%) in the rejection group, and 527 (11%) in the control group. In summary, severe RLN is uncommon in recipients of a kidney allograft, but black recipients, female recipient, and younger recipients are at increased risk. Although RLN significantly increases the risk for graft failure, it contributes far less than rejection to its overall incidence; therefore, these findings should not keep patients with lupus from seeking a kidney transplant.


Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Trasplante de Riñón , Nefritis Lúpica/epidemiología , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Rechazo de Injerto/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Fallo Renal Crónico/etiología , Nefritis Lúpica/complicaciones , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Grupos Raciales , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Trasplante Homólogo
2.
N Engl J Med ; 350(10): 971-80, 2004 Mar 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14999109

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Long-term therapy with cyclophosphamide enhances renal survival in patients with proliferative lupus nephritis; however, the beneficial effect of cyclophosphamide must be weighed against its considerable toxic effects. METHODS: Fifty-nine patients with lupus nephritis (12 in World Health Organization class III, 46 in class IV, and 1 in class Vb) received induction therapy consisting of a maximum of seven monthly boluses of intravenous cyclophosphamide (0.5 to 1.0 g per square meter of body-surface area) plus corticosteroids. Subsequently, the patients were randomly assigned to one of three maintenance therapies: quarterly intravenous injections of cyclophosphamide, oral azathioprine (1 to 3 mg per kilogram of body weight per day), or oral mycophenolate mofetil (500 to 3000 mg per day) for one to three years. The base-line characteristics of the three groups were similar, with the exception that the chronicity index was 1.9 points lower in the cyclophosphamide group than in the mycophenolate mofetil group (P=0.009). RESULTS: During maintenance therapy, five patients died (four in the cyclophosphamide group and one in the mycophenolate mofetil group), and chronic renal failure developed in five (three in the cyclophosphamide group and one each in the azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil groups). The 72-month event-free survival rate for the composite end point of death or chronic renal failure was higher in the mycophenolate mofetil and azathioprine groups than in the cyclophosphamide group (P=0.05 and P=0.009, respectively). The rate of relapse-free survival was higher in the mycophenolate mofetil group than in the cyclophosphamide group (P=0.02). The incidence of hospitalization, amenorrhea, infections, nausea, and vomiting was significantly lower in the mycophenolate mofetil and azathioprine groups than in the cyclophosphamide group. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with proliferative lupus nephritis, short-term therapy with intravenous cyclophosphamide followed by maintenance therapy with mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine appears to be more efficacious and safer than long-term therapy with intravenous cyclophosphamide.


Asunto(s)
Azatioprina/uso terapéutico , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapéutico , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Nefritis Lúpica/tratamiento farmacológico , Ácido Micofenólico/análogos & derivados , Ácido Micofenólico/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Amenorrea/inducido químicamente , Azatioprina/efectos adversos , Ciclofosfamida/efectos adversos , Esquema de Medicación , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Infecciones/etiología , Infusiones Intravenosas , Fallo Renal Crónico/prevención & control , Nefritis Lúpica/mortalidad , Masculino , Ácido Micofenólico/efectos adversos , Prednisona/uso terapéutico , Recurrencia , Inducción de Remisión , Análisis de Supervivencia
4.
J Rheumatol ; 35(3): 429-37, 2008 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18260175

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: A cross-sectional study of mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD) was performed to determine if there were identifiable differences in the clinical expression of MCTD associated with race or ethnicity. METHODS: Miami, Florida, and Midwestern US (Missouri) Caucasian MCTD cohorts were studied. Clinical and laboratory features of the 2 MCTD cohorts were compared. A concurrently collected cohort of Sm-positive patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) was studied as a control. Disease activity and severity and functional status were measured. CD4+CD25(high)-expressing T-regulatory cells were enumerated and serum soluble L selectin was measured as biomarkers of disease activity. RESULTS: The Miami and Missouri Caucasian MCTD groups, while differing from the SLE group, were largely similar; however, gastroesophageal reflux, sclerodactyly, and malar rash were significantly more frequent in the Missouri MCTD group and alopecia was more frequent in the Miami MCTD group. Significant clinical and laboratory differences were found between the Miami MCTD and Miami SLE groups despite similar disease duration, activity, severity and functional status. Raynaud's phenomenon (RP), hand swelling, synovitis, myositis, and sclerodactyly were all significantly more common in RNP-positive MCTD versus Sm-positive SLE subjects. CONCLUSION Ethnic differences were observed in the frequency of end-organ involvement in the Miami MCTD versus the Missouri Caucasian MCTD groups. Clinical and laboratory features of all MCTD groups were clearly different from the SLE group, despite similar disease activity, disease severity, and functional status. Disease activity measures appeared to behave similarly as valid measures of disease activity in SLE and MCTD.


Asunto(s)
Selectina L/sangre , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/inmunología , Enfermedad Mixta del Tejido Conjuntivo/etnología , Enfermedad Mixta del Tejido Conjuntivo/inmunología , Linfocitos T Reguladores , Adolescente , Adulto , Negro o Afroamericano/etnología , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios Transversales , Florida/epidemiología , Hispánicos o Latinos/etnología , Humanos , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/etnología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Missouri/epidemiología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Población Blanca/etnología
5.
Ann Plast Surg ; 54(4): 442-4, 2005 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15785288

RESUMEN

Following mastectomy, women with breast cancer are faced with choices for reconstruction. In women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), with or without antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), concurrent morbidities are important considerations when deciding the method of reconstruction. The 2 cases we present represent the variable spectrum of SLE and/or APS and their potential complications. When deciding the best course of action, it is most important to consider each case on an individual basis, with important emphasis on preoperative disease status.


Asunto(s)
Mama/cirugía , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/cirugía , Mamoplastia/métodos , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Adulto , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Colgajos Quirúrgicos , Trasplante Autólogo
6.
Eye Contact Lens ; 30(1): 2-5, 2004 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14722460

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To review the efficacy of Etanercept as an alternate therapy for treatment of necrotizing anterior scleritis and sterile corneal ulceration unresponsive to traditional therapies. METHODS: A retrospective review of 10 patients treated with Etanercept for vision-threatening scleritis and sterile corneal ulceration. RESULTS: Etanercept alone or in combination with other immunosuppressive therapies controlled inflammation, arrested tissue ulceration, and in many cases permitted tapering or cessation of toxic immunosuppressive therapies. No complications or systemic toxicity were observed with Etanercept use. CONCLUSION: Etanercept is an effective treatment for scleritis and sterile corneal ulceration and has a favorable benefit-to-risk ratio. It may be considered for therapy of progressive disease or cases that are unresponsive to traditional therapies.


Asunto(s)
Úlcera de la Córnea/tratamiento farmacológico , Inmunoglobulina G/uso terapéutico , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Receptores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/uso terapéutico , Escleritis/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Úlcera de la Córnea/patología , Etanercept , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Escleritis/patología , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda