Allopurinol adherence among patients with gout: an Italian general practice database study.

AIMS: Allopurinol is used as long-term therapy to reduce the occurrence of gout flares. This study estimated the impact of patient adherence to allopurinol on hyperuricaemia (serum uric acid levels, sUA > 6 mg/dl) and the identification of non-adherence predictors. METHODS: The Italian Health Search-CSD Longitudinal Patient Database was accessed to identify outpatients aged ≥ 18 years with gout and prescribed with allopurinol during the years 2002-2011. Patients with a proportion of days covered ≥ 80% were considered adherent to allopurinol. Data on sUA levels over the first year of therapy were categorised in three time-windows (30-89; 90-149; 150-365 days). Logistic regressions were used to estimate the association between adherence and hyperuricaemia, as well as non-adherence predictors. RESULTS: A total of 3727 patients were included. In the interval 0-29 days, the proportion of patients adherent to allopurinol was 45.9%, while up to 89, 149 and 365 days the percentages were 16.7%, 10.0% and 3.2%, respectively. The proportions of hyperuricaemic patients for each time-window were 43.1%, 42.4%, 32.6% and 59.0%, 64.0%, 66.4% among adherent and non-adherent patients, respectively. In the multivariable analysis, adherence was associated with a significant lower risk of hyperuricaemia. The adjusted ORs were 0.49 (95% CI: 0.33-0.73), 0.40 (95% CI: 0.24-0.67) and 0.23 (95% CI: 0.15-0.34) for the first, second and third time-window, respectively. Patients with hypertension (adjusted OR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.42-0.99) and history of gout flares (adjusted OR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.32-0.95) were significantly adherent to allopurinol. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence monitoring in patients with gout is pivotal to ensure the effectiveness of therapy. To gain a better patient adherence, the communication between physicians and patients should be improved.

Effects of a bicarbonate-alkaline mineral water on digestive motility in experimental models of functional and inflammatory gastrointestinal disorders.

This study investigates the effects of Uliveto, a bicarbonate-alkaline mineral water, in experimental models of diarrhea, constipation and colitis. Rats were allowed to drink Uliveto or oligomineral water (control) for 30 days. Diarrhea and constipation were evoked by 16,16-dimethyl-prostaglandin E(2) (dmPGE(2)) or loperamide, respectively. Colitis was induced by 2,4-dinitrobenzenesulfonic acid (DNBS) or acetic acid. Gastric emptying, small-intestinal and colonic transit were evaluated. dmPGE(2)-induced diarrhea reduced gastric emptying and increased small-intestinal and colonic transit. In this setting, Uliveto water enhanced gastric emptying, and this effect was prevented by L-365,260 (gastrin receptor antagonist). Loperamide-induced constipation reduced gastric emptying, small-intestinal and colonic transit, and these effects were prevented by Uliveto water. L-365,260 counteracted the effects of Uliveto on gastric emptying, while alosetron (serotonin 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist) blunted the effect of Uliveto on colonic transit. Gastric emptying, small-intestinal and colonic transit were reduced in DNBS-induced colitis, and Uliveto water enhanced gastric emptying and normalized small-intestinal and colonic transit. Gastric emptying, small-intestinal and colonic transit were also reduced in acetic acid-induced colitis, and Uliveto increased both gastric emptying and small-intestinal transit. In conclusion, Uliveto water exerts beneficial effects on gastrointestinal motility in the presence of bowel motor dysfunctions. The effects of Uliveto water on gastric emptying depend on gastrin-mediated mechanisms, whereas the activation of serotonergic pathways accounts for the modulation of colonic functions.

Cholecystokinin CCK2 receptors mediate the peptide's inhibitory actions on the contractile activity of human distal colon via the nitric oxide pathway.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Cholecystokinin is known to exert stimulant actions on intestinal motility via activation of type 1 cholecystokinin receptors (CCK(1)). However, the role played by cholecystokinin 2 (CCK(2)) receptors in the regulation of gut motility remains undetermined. This study was designed to examine the influence of CCK(2) receptors on the contractile activity of human distal colon. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The effects of compounds acting on CCK(2) receptors were assessed in vitro on motor activity of longitudinal smooth muscle, under basal conditions as well as in the presence of KCl-induced contractions or transmural electrical stimulation. KEY RESULTS: Cholecystokinin octapeptide sulphate induced concentration-dependent contractions which were enhanced by GV150013 (CCK(2) receptor antagonist; +57% at 0.01 microM). These effects were unaffected by tetrodotoxin. The enhancing actions of GV150013 on contractions evoked by cholecystokinin octapeptide sulphate were unaffected by N(omega)-propyl-L-arginine (NPA, neuronal nitric oxide synthase inhibitor), while they were prevented by N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine methylester (L-NAME, non-selective nitric oxide synthase inhibitor). In the presence of KCl-induced contractions, cholecystokinin octapeptide sulphate elicited concentration-dependent relaxations (-36%), which were unaffected by NPA, but were counteracted by GV150013 or L-NAME. The application of electrical stimuli evoked phasic contractions which were enhanced by GV150013 (+41 % at 0.01 microM). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: CCK(2) receptors mediate inhibitory actions of cholecystokinin on motor activity of human distal colon. It is suggested that CCK(2) receptors exert their modulating actions through a nitric oxide pathway, independent of the activity of the neuronal nitric oxide synthase isoform.

Expected and actual adverse drug-drug interactions in elderly patients accessing the emergency department: data from the ANCESTRAL-ED study.

OBJECTIVE: This study was aimed at evaluating the frequency and describing the adverse drug-drug interactions (DDIs) recorded among elderly patients accessing the emergency department (ED). METHODS: Patients aged ≥65 years, accessing the ED of Pisa University Hospital (Italy) from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2015 within the ANCESTRAL-ED program, were included in this study. 'Expected' DDIs were assessed using Thomson Micromedex®. Each ED admission (discharge diagnosis) consistent with the signs and symptoms of an expected DDI for each patient was classified as an 'actual' DDI. RESULTS: Throughout the study period, 3473 patients (3812 ED admissions, 58% females, mean age: 80.3) were recorded. The total number of expected DDIs was 12,578 (67 contraindicated; 3334 major; 8878 moderate; 299 minor) detected in 2147 (62%) patients. Overall 464 expected DDIs were found to be consistent with the ED admission in 194 patients (representing 9% of patients with expected DDIs). CONCLUSIONS: More than one half of elderly patients admitted to ED presented at least one expected DDI at the time of ED presentation. However, 9% of the expected DDIs were identified as actual DDIs, based on the consistency of the expected event with the ED discharge diagnosis.

Mechanisms of protection by pantoprazole against NSAID-induced gastric mucosal damage.

The use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can be associated with severe adverse digestive effects. In clinical settings, proton pump inhibitors have proven to be effective in preventing and healing NSAID-induced gastroduodenal lesions. The present study investigates the mechanisms of protection afforded by pantoprazole against gastric injury induced by different NSAIDs in rats. Animals were orally treated with indomethacin (100 micromol/kg), diclofenac (60 micromol/kg), piroxicam (150 micromol/kg) or ketoprofen (150 micromol/kg). Thirty minutes before NSAIDs, animals received pantoprazole 6 or 60 micromol/kg orally. Four hours after NSAIDs, the following parameters were assessed: histomorphometric evaluation of gastric mucosal damage; gastric mucosal levels of myeloperoxidase (MPO), malondialdehyde (MDA), reduced glutathione as an index of non-proteic sulfhydryl compounds (GSH), and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2); mucosal cyclooxygenase-1 and -2 (COX-1, COX-2) mRNA expression by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Separate experiments were carried out to assay the effects of pantoprazole on gastric acid secretion in pylorus-ligated rats. The in vitro influence of pantoprazole (1-10 microM) on the oxidation of low density lipoproteins (LDLs) induced by copper sulphate was also examined. All NSAIDs elicited mucosal necrotic lesions associated with neutrophil infiltration and reduction of PGE2 levels. Increments of MPO and MDA contents, as well as a decrease in GSH levels, were detected in the gastric mucosa of indomethacin-, piroxicam- or ketoprofen-treated animals. Indomethacin enhanced mucosal COX-2 expression, while not affecting COX-1. At the oral dose of 6 micromol/kg pantoprazole did not affect NSAID-induced mucosal damage, whereas at 60 micromol/kg it markedly reduced injuries provoked by all test NSAIDs. Pantoprazole 60 micromol/kg also reversed the effects of NSAIDs on MPO, MDA, and GSH mucosal contents, without interfering with the decrease in PGE2 levels or indomethacin-induced COX-2 expression. However, at both doses, pantoprazole inhibited acid secretion in pylorus-ligated rats. Furthermore, pantoprazole concentration dependently reduced the in vitro oxidation of LDLs. Our results suggest that besides inhibiting acid secretion, the protection afforded by pantoprazole against NSAID-induced gastric damage depends on a reduction in mucosal oxidative injury, which may also account for an increment of sulfhydryl radical mucosal bioavailability. It is also suggested that pantoprazole does not influence the down-regulation of gastric prostaglandin production associated with NSAID treatment.

Role of the A(2B) receptor-adenosine deaminase complex in colonic dysmotility associated with bowel inflammation in rats.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Adenosine A(2B) receptors regulate several physiological enteric functions. However, their role in the pathophysiology of intestinal dysmotility associated with inflammation has not been elucidated. Hence, we investigated the expression of A2B receptors in rat colon and their role in the control of cholinergic motility in the presence of bowel inflammation. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Colitis was induced by 2,4-dinitrobenzenesulfonic acid (DNBS). Colonic A(2B) receptor expression and localization were examined by RT-PCR and immunofluorescence. The interaction between A(2B) receptors and adenosine deaminase was assayed by immunoprecipitation. The role of A(2B) receptors in the control of colonic motility was examined in functional experiments on longitudinal muscle preparations (LMPs). KEY RESULTS: A(2B) receptor mRNA was present in colon from both normal and DNBS-treated rats but levels were increased in the latter. A(2B) receptors were predominantly located in the neuromuscular layer, but, in the presence of colitis, were increased mainly in longitudinal muscle. Functionally, the A(2B) receptor antagonist MRS 1754 enhanced both electrically-evoked and carbachol-induced cholinergic contractions in normal LMPs, but was less effective in inflamed tissues. The A(2B) receptor agonist NECA decreased colonic cholinergic motility, with increased efficacy in inflamed LMP. Immunoprecipitation and functional tests revealed a link between A(2B) receptors and adenosine deaminase, which colocalize in the neuromuscular compartment. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Under normal conditions, endogenous adenosine modulates colonic motility via A2B receptors located in the neuromuscular compartment. In the presence of colitis, this inhibitory control is impaired due to a link between A2B receptors and adenosine deaminase, which catabolizes adenosine, thus preventing A(2B) receptor activation.

Control of enteric neuromuscular functions by purinergic A(3) receptors in normal rat distal colon and experimental bowel inflammation.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Adenosine A(3) receptors mediate beneficial effects in experimental colitis, but their involvement in enteric neuromuscular functions during bowel inflammation is undetermined. This study investigated the regulatory role of A(3) receptors on colonic motility in the presence of experimental colitis. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Colitis was induced in rats by 2,4-dinitrobenzenesulfonic acid. A(3) receptors and adenosine deaminase (ADA, adenosine catabolic enzyme) mRNA were examined by RT-PCR. Tissue distribution of A(3) receptors was detected by confocal immunofluorescence. The effects of 2,3-ethyl-4,5-dipropyl-6-phenylpyridine-3-thiocarboxylate-5-carboxylate (MRS1523) (MRS, A(3) receptor antagonist), 2-chloro-N(6) -(3-iodobenzyl)-adenosine-5'-N-methyluronamide (2Cl-IB-MECA) (CIB, A(3) receptor agonist), dipyridamole (DIP, adenosine transport inhibitor) and ADA were assayed on contractile responses evoked by electrical stimulation (ES) or carbachol in colonic longitudinal muscle preparations (LMP). KEY RESULTS: RT-PCR showed A(3) receptors and ADA mRNA in normal colon and their increased level in inflamed tissues. Immunofluorescence showed a predominant distribution of A(3) receptors in normal myenteric ganglia and an increased density during colitis. MRS enhanced ES-induced cholinergic contractions in normal LMP, but was less effective in inflamed tissues. After pretreatment with dipyridamole plus ADA, to reduce extracellular adenosine, CIB decreased cholinergic motor responses of normal LMP to ES, with enhanced efficacy in inflamed LMP. A(3) receptor ligands did not affect carbachol-induced contractions in LMP from normal or inflamed colon. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Normally, adenosine modulated colonic cholinergic motility via activation of A(3) receptors in the myenteric plexus. A(3) receptor-mediated tonic inhibitory control by adenosine was impaired in inflamed bowel, despite increased density of functioning and pharmacologically recruitable A(3) receptors.

Characterization of mechanisms underlying the effects of esomeprazole on the impairment of gastric ulcer healing with addition of NSAID treatment.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of proton pump inhibitors in patients at high risk of gastrointestinal injury receiving non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is currently debated. AIMS: To evaluate the effects of esomeprazole on the impairment of gastric ulcer healing associated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug treatment. METHODS: Gastric ulcers were induced in rats by acetic acid. Four days later, animals were treated daily with equivalent acid-inhibiting doses of esomeprazole or famotidine, alone or in combination with indomethacin. At day 3 or 7 of treatment, ulcerated tissues were processed to assess: ulcer area; malondialdehyde; prostaglandin E(2); nuclear factor-kB; proliferating cell nuclear antigen and caspase-3 (Western blot). RESULTS: In indomethacin-treated animals, esomeprazole was more effective than famotidine or the antioxidant melatonin in promoting ulcer healing. Malondialdehyde levels were increased by indomethacin, and this effect was counteracted by esomeprazole, but not famotidine. Esomeprazole and famotidine, given alone or in combination with indomethacin, increased proliferating cell nuclear antigen expression. Increased levels of prostaglandin E(2) were detected in ulcerated tissues. Ulcer prostaglandin E(2) production was reduced by indomethacin, alone or in combination with esomeprazole or famotidine, while it was enhanced when esomeprazole or famotidine were tested alone. The activation of caspase-3 was induced by indomethacin, and this effect was prevented by esomeprazole, but not famotidine. In the presence of indomethacin, esomeprazole, but not famotidine, enhanced nuclear factor-kB activation in gastric ulcers. CONCLUSIONS: Esomeprazole counteracts the detrimental action of indomethacin on ulcer repair through both acid-dependent and acid-independent effects. The acid-independent actions are related to decrease in tissue oxidation and apoptosis and to enhancement of nuclear factor-kB activation.

A1 and A2a receptors mediate inhibitory effects of adenosine on the motor activity of human colon.

Experimental evidence in animal models suggests that adenosine is involved in the regulation of digestive functions. This study examines the influence of adenosine on the contractile activity of human colon. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction revealed A(1) and A(2a) receptor expression in colonic neuromuscular layers. Circular muscle preparations were connected to isotonic transducers to determine the effects of 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX; A(1) receptor antagonist), ZM 241385 (A(2a) receptor antagonist), CCPA (A(1) receptor agonist) and 2-[(p-2-carboxyethyl)-phenethylamino]-5'-N-ethyl-carboxamide-adenosine (CGS 21680; A(2a) receptor agonist) on motor responses evoked by electrical stimulation or carbachol. Electrically evoked contractions were enhanced by DPCPX and ZM 241385, and reduced by CCPA and CGS 21680. Similar effects were observed when colonic preparations were incubated with guanethidine (noradrenergic blocker), L-732,138, GR-159897 and SB-218795 (NK receptor antagonists). However, in the presence of guanethidine, NK receptor antagonists and N(omega)-propyl-L-arginine (NPA; neuronal nitric oxide synthase inhibitor), the effects of DPCPX and CCPA were still evident, while those of ZM 241385 and CGS 21680 no longer occurred. Carbachol-induced contractions were unaffected by A(2a) receptor ligands, but they were enhanced or reduced by DPCPX and CCPA, respectively. When colonic preparations were incubated with guanethidine, NK antagonists and atropine, electrically induced relaxations were partly reduced by ZM 241385 or NPA, but unaffected by DPCPX. Dipyridamole or application of exogenous adenosine reduced electrically and carbachol-evoked contractions, whereas adenosine deaminase enhanced such motor responses. In conclusion, adenosine exerts an inhibitory control on human colonic motility. A(1) receptors mediate direct modulating actions on smooth muscle, whereas A(2a) receptors operate through inhibitory nitrergic nerve pathways.

Tolerability profiles of leukotriene receptor antagonists and long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists in combination with inhaled corticosteroids for treatment of asthma: a review.

Inhaled corticosteroids, long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists, and leukotriene receptor antagonists are widely used for treatment of asthma. Inhaled corticosteroids are recommended as first-line therapy, whereas long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists and leukotriene receptor antagonists are indicated as add-on therapy in patients not adequately controlled with corticosteroids alone. A number of studies have investigated the efficacy of combinations of these drugs in asthma, but several issues concerning the safety of these treatments are highly debated. This review provides a critical appraisal of the tolerability profiles of long-acting beta2-agonists and leukotriene receptor antagonists used in combination with inhaled corticosteroids for the treatment of asthma.

Cyclophosphamide-methotrexate 'metronomic' chemotherapy for the palliative treatment of metastatic breast cancer. A comparative pharmacoeconomic evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Metronomic chemotherapy-the chronic administration of chemotherapy at relatively low, minimally toxic doses on a frequent schedule of administration at close regular intervals, with no prolonged drug-free breaks-is a potentially novel approach to the control of advanced cancer disease. It is thought to work primarily through antiangiogenic mechanisms and has, as an advantage, the property of significantly reducing undesirable toxic side-effects. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of cyclophosphamide-methotrexate 'metronomic' chemotherapy in the palliative treatment of pretreated metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: Low-dose cyclophosphamide-methotrexate 'metronomic' chemotherapy was compared with outcome and resource utilisation data of published phase II trials regarding metastatic breast cancer, performed in western countries, mostly in Europe. All direct costs associated with metastatic breast cancer treatment were included and adjusted to year 2003 values. Sensitivity analyses were performed and variations to the values of key parameters were assessed. RESULTS: Low-dose cyclophosphamide-methotrexate 'metronomic' therapy was assessed to be a cost-effective/cost-saving therapy for palliative treatment for metastatic breast cancer when compared with novel chemotherapy strategies (phase II trials). Compared with the 11 phase II mono- and combination chemotherapies, metronomic treatment showed marked cost savings in each case and improved cost effectiveness. Sensitivity analyses showed the results were robust to variations to the values of key parameters with very few exceptions. CONCLUSIONS: Metronomic cyclophosphamide-methotrexate is significantly cost effective. If validated by prospective randomized trials, the treatment concept could reduce healthcare costs, especially those associated with the combined use of new, highly expensive, molecularly targeted therapies.