Real life results of direct acting antiviral therapy for HCV infection in HIV-HCV-coinfected patients: Epi-Ter2 study.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the baseline demographics and real-life efficacy of direct acting antivirals (DAAs) in HIV-HCV-positive patients as compared to patients with HCV monoinfection. The analysis included 5690 subjects who were treated with DAAs: 5533 were HCV-positive and 157 were HIV-HCV-positive. Patients with HCV-monoinfection were older (p < .0001) and in HIV-HCV group there were more men (p < .0001). Prevalence of genotype 1a (p = .002), as well as of genotypes 3 and 4 (p < .0001) was higher in HIV-HCV-coinfected patients. Genotype 1b was more frequent (p < .0001) in the HCV-mono-infection group. Patients with HCV-monoinfection had a higher proportion of fibrosis F4 (p = .0004) and lower proportion of fibrosis F2 (p < .0001). HIV-HCV-coinfected individuals were more often treatment-naïve (p < .0001). Rates of sustained viral response after 12 weeks did not differ significantly between both groups (95.9% versus 97.3% in coinfection and monoinfection group, respectively; p > .05). They were, however, influenced by HCV genotype (p < .0001), stage of hepatic fibrosis (p < .0001), male sex (p < .0001), BMI (p = .0001) and treatment regimen modifications (p < .0001). Although factors associated with worse response to therapy (male sex, genotype 3) occurred more often in the HIV coinfection group, real-life results of DAAs did not differ significantly between both populations.

Hepatitis C virus core antigen as a possible alternative for evaluation of treatment effectiveness after treatment with direct-acting antivirals.

Background: Chronic hepatitis C is a major public health problem around the world. In monitoring treatment efficacy, although costly and labour-intensive methods of molecular biology are often used, much cheaper and technically easier serological methods evaluating the concentration of HCV core antigen in serum are available. We evaluated HCVcAg quantification as a possible assessment of the treatment efficacy instead of HCV RNA quantification.Methods: We collected 514 serum samples from treated HCV infected patients. Quantitative evaluation of HCV RNA and HCVcAg was carried out before treatment, at the end of treatment, and at least 12 weeks following treatment termination. HCV RNA was determined by automated assay (Roche COBAS) and HCVcAg quantitation with ARCHITECT ci8200 analyser.Results: There was a significant correlation between HCVcAg and HCV RNA concentrations at baseline and follow-up visits, but not at the end of treatment. Among samples collected before the treatment, at the end of treatment and follow-up visit, concordance of HCV RNA and HCVcAg reached level of 98.1%, 98.9% and 98.7%, respectively. Diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of HCVcAg detection were >97%.Conclusions: HCVcAg measurement could be an alternative for determining HCV treatment efficacy after chemotherapy and could be an option in the diagnosis of HCV infection.