The Comparison of FLOT and DCF Regimens as Perioperative Treatment for Gastric Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Locoregional gastric cancer is a still serious problem and perioperative treatments may improve success of management. Different regimens were examined. The present study purposed to compare efficacy of FLOT and DCF regimens. METHODS: Retrospective multicenter study assesed the patients with locoregional gastric cancer. There are 240 patients (137 DCF, 103 FLOT). Survival rates were compared. RESULTS: Demographic features were similar between two groups, but time period was different. FLOT group had 7.8% pathological complete response, while DCF group did not have. Disease-free survival was longer in FLOT than DCF group (median not reached-13.94 months respectively). Median overall survival was similar (30.9 vs 37.8 months) but median follow-up affected the analysis. Survival for 36 months was 63% for FLOT and 40% for DCF group (p=0.015). CONCLUSION: FLOT regimen was superior on DCF regimen for response and survival rates. DCF is historical approach. Long term follow up period needed for FLOT treatment.

Clinical outcomes of concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors and regorafenib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter study.

AIM: To compare survival outcomes, response rates, and adverse events (AEs) in proton pump inhibitor (PPI) user and non-user patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with regorafenib. METHODS: We included 272 patients with mCRC treated with regorafenib in this study. Patients were divided into two categories according to their status of PPI use. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were time to treatment failure (TTF), response rates, and safety. To exclude immortal time bias in survival analyses, we compared PPI non-user patients and all patients. RESULTS: There were 141 and 131 patients in the PPI non-user and user groups. Baseline characteristics were similar in each group. Pantoprazole was the most used PPI. At the median 35.2 (95% confidence interval (CI): 32.6-37.9) months follow-up, the median OS was similar in PPI non-user and all patients (6.9 months (95% CI: 5.3-8.5) and 7.7 months (95% CI:6.6-8.8), p = 0.913). TTF was also similar in PPI non-user and all patients (3.3 months (95% CI: 2.7-3.9) and 3.5 months (95% CI: 3.0-4.0), p = 0.661). In multivariable analysis, no statistically significant difference was observed between PPI user and non-user groups in OS and TTF (hazard ratio (HR), 0.99; 95% CI, 0.77-1.28; p = 0.963 for OS; HR, 0.93; 0.77-1.20, p = 0.598 for TTF). The objective response rates (ORR) were similar in the PPI non-user and user groups (19.8% and 16.8%, p = 0.455). The rates of any grade AEs were also similar in each group. CONCLUSION: This study found no worse outcome in the combined use of PPI and regorafenib among patients with mCRC.

Comparison of First-Line Chemotherapeutics and Validation of the EORTC Prognostic Index in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Retrospective Single-Centre Experience.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficiency of pemetrexed cisplatin in comparison with gemcitabine cisplatin and to validate the EORTC (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer) prognostic score in combination chemotherapy treatment for malignant pleural mesothelioma. STUDY DESIGN:  An observational study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Oncology, Dicle University Hospital, Diyarbakir, Turkiye, from October 2000 to November 2017. METHODOLOGY: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) patients with EORTC score 0- were recruited. Factors affecting the prognosis of the disease and the effectiveness of first-line treatment were retrospectively analysed. EORTC prognostic score was calculated with a cut-off and survival analyses were used by the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank and univariable Cox regression tests were used to search for prognostic factors' impact on survival. RESULTS: Patients who received gemcitabine cisplatin treatment had a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 9 months, while those who received pemetrexed cisplatin therapy had a median PFS of 7 months. Median overall survival (OS) was 17 months in the gemcitabine cisplatin group and 18 months in the pemetrexed cisplatin group (p = 0.051). When the low-risk group was compared with the high-risk group, the median OS was found to be statistically significant (p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: The EORTC prognostic score, which is used for prognostic prediction in the period when pemetrexed is not utilised in the treatment of MPM, accurately predicts prognosis subsequent to the administration of pemetrexed in treatment. In the context of first-line treatment, cisplatin in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in combination with pemetrexed demonstrated comparable efficacy with respect to both overall survival and progression-free survival. KEY WORDS: Chemotherapy, Mesothelioma, Prognosis, Gemcitabine, Progression-free survival.

Comparison of Two Chemotherapy Regimens After First-Line Treatment for HER2-Negative Metastatic Gastric Cancer.

AIM: Metastatic stage gastric cancer is a disease with a poor prognosis and the likelihood of achieving a cure in these patients is low. Treatment response to subsequent-line treatments is poor. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the folinic acid, fluorouracil and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) and paclitaxel+carboplatin regimens, which are used in subsequent lines of therapy in advanced-stage gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 40 patients who have metastatic stage gastric cancer and received FOLFIRI or paclitaxel+carboplatin therapy in subsequent lines of therapy between 2017 and 2022. The data of the patients were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: At diagnosis median age was 51 (23-88) years. The tumor was localized in the gastroesophageal junction in eight (20%) patients and in other gastric locations in 32 (80%) patients. At diagnosis, 75% (n=30) of the patients presented with the disease in the metastatic stage, while 25% (n=10) presented with stage II-III disease. Regarding the treatments received in the second and further lines of therapy, 18 (45%) patients received paclitaxel+carboplatin and 22 (55%) patients received a FOLFIRI regimen. Of these treatments, 67.5% (n=27) were given as the second line and 32.5% (n=13) were given as third-line therapy. The objective response rate (ORR) was 45.5% in the FOLFIRI arm compared to 16.7% in the paclitaxel+carboplatin arm (p=0.05). Both treatment arms had a median progression-free survival (PFS) of three months (p=0.82). The median overall survival (OS) time was seven months in the FOLFIRI arm compared to eight months in the paclitaxel+carboplatin arm (p=0.71). Side effects were similar between both treatment arms. CONCLUSION: This study determined that FOLFIRI and paclitaxel+carboplatin treatments have similar OS, PFS, and side effect profiles in subsequent line treatment of gastric cancer. The FOLFIRI treatment regimen yielded a higher ORR.