Voice bubbling therapy for vocal cord dysfunction in difficult-to-treat asthma - a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: Dysfunctional breathing often coexists with asthma and complicates asthma control, especially in difficult-to-treat asthma. Voice bubbling therapy (VBT) by a specialized speech therapist may influence the breathing pattern. This pilot study investigated the effect of voice bubbling therapy (VBT) in participants with difficult-to-treat asthma, who fulfilled criteria for dysfunctional breathing pattern. METHOD: Twenty-four patients were randomized between VBT and usual care (UC). VBT is blowing into a glass (resonance) tube (28 cm in length, 0.9 cm inner diameter) which ends in a bowl of water (1.5 litre). Lung function, capillary blood gas and questionnaires were measured at baseline, at 6 and 18 weeks of follow up. RESULTS: No difference in ACQ and quality of life was found after VBT compared to UC group. However, after six weeks of bubbling therapy, pCO2 levels measured in capillary blood gas were higher (baseline median (IQR) pCO2 = 33.00 (17.25 - 38.6) mmHg; week 6 pCO2 = 36.00 (29.00 - 42.3) mmHg) p = 0.01. Moreover, ΔpCO2 (baseline - 18 weeks of follow up) was significantly correlated with ΔAQLQ (rs = 0.78, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: VBT in participants with difficult-to-treat asthma resulted in a higher average pCO2 level, indicating the treatment may improve hyperventilation. However, this did not improve asthma control or quality of life. VBT may have value for a better management of asthma related symptoms.

High intensity training in obesity: a Meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: High Intensity training (HIT) is a time-effective alternative to traditional exercise programs in adults with obesity, but the superiority in terms of improving cardiopulmonary fitness and weight loss has not been demonstrated. OBJECTIVE: to determine the effectiveness of HIT on cardiopulmonary fitness and body composition in adults with obesity compared to traditional (high volume continuous) exercise. METHODS: A systematic search of the main health science databases was conducted for randomized controlled trials comparing HIT with traditional forms of exercise in people with obesity. Eighteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. The (unstandardized) mean difference of each outcome parameters was calculated and pooled with the random effects model. RESULTS: HIT resulted in greater improvement of cardiopulmonary fitness (VO2max) (MD 1.83, 95% CI 0.70, 2.96, p<0.005; I2=31%) and a greater reduction of %body fat (MD -1.69, 95% CI -3.10, -0.27, p=0.02, I2=30%) compared to traditional exercise. Overall effect for BMI was not different between HIT and traditional exercise. CONCLUSION: Training at high intensity is superior to improve cardiopulmonary fitness and to reduce %body fat in adults with obesity compared to traditional exercise. Future studies are needed to design specific HIT programs for the obese with regard to optimal effect and long-term adherence.

Addition of dexmedetomidine to lidocaine for intravenous regional anaesthesia.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the duration of onset and regression time of sensory and motor blocks, the quality of anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia by the addition of dexmedetomidine to local anaesthetic solution in intravenous regional anaesthesia (IVRA). METHODS: Forty patients scheduled for elective hand surgery participated in this prospective randomized double-blind study. The IVRA was achieved using 3 mg kg(-1) lidocaine diluted with saline to a total volume of 40 mL in the control group or 1 microg kg(-1) of dexmedetomidine + 3 mg kg(-1) lidocaine diluted with saline to a total volume of 40 mL in the dexmedetomidine group. The onset and regression times for sensory and motor blocks were recorded. Qualities of anaesthesia, intraoperative and postoperative analgesic requirements were noted. RESULTS: There was no difference between the groups with respect to sensory and motor blocks onset and regression time. The quality of anaesthesia was better in the dexmedetomidine group than the control group and the difference was statistically significant. Intraoperative and postoperative analgesic requirements were greater in the control group than in the dexmedetomidine group. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of dexmedetomidine to local anaesthetic solution in IVRA improved the quality of anaesthesia and decreased analgesic requirements, but had no effect on the sensory and motor blocks onset and regression times.