[Consensus opinion on antifungal prophylaxis in haematologic patients: Results of the PROMIC project]. / Posicionamiento y actitudes de manejo sobre la profilaxis antifúngica en el paciente hematológico (proyecto PROMIC).

OBJECTIVE: Invasive fungal disease (IFD) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in haematological patients. Antifungal prophylaxis (AFP) is indicated for a number of clinical scenarios in this group of patients. The aim of this study was to reach a consensus on IFD prophylaxis in haematological patients in order to optimize their management. METHODS: A committee of experts in haematology and infectious diseases compiled a survey of 79 items with controversial aspects about antifungal prophylaxis in haematological patients. The survey was evaluated in two rounds by a panel of experts following a modified Delphi methodology. RESULTS: Forty-four experts in haematology and infectious diseases answered the survey. After two evaluation rounds, consensus was reached in 67 of the 79 items (84.8%), specifically 48 items were consensually agreed on (60.7%) and 19 were disagreed on (24.0%). Consensus was reached on prophylaxis candidates profiles and questions related to indications, mechanisms of action, spectrum of activity, toxicity and interactions of antifungal were elucidated. The usefulness of micafungin in IFD prophylaxis was particularly analysed. The consensus reached was that micafungin is an antifungal to be considered in this context as its safety profile and lower interaction potential may be advantageous. CONCLUSIONS: A broad consensus was found in the management of IFD prophylaxis in the haematological patient. This consensus provides practical indications about its optimal management and can help determine the profile of patients eligible for this type of intervention.

Potential protective effect of Helicobacter pylori on the development of gastrointestinal GvHD.

Previous reports ascribe a modulating capacity of the immune response to Helicobacter pylori (HP). Our hypothesis was to demonstrate in a prospective study that HP infection could have a protective effect against development of gastrointestinal GvHD in patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Presence of HP before transplant was determined using C(13) urea breath test. Seventy-nine patients receiving an allogeneic HCT were included and 93.7% of them received PBSC; in 51.9%, the donor was unrelated. Acute gastrointestinal GvHD was diagnosed in 51.9% (n=41). In the multivariable analysis, HP infection was associated with a lower frequency of gastrointestinal GvHD (odds ratio (OR)=0.19 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.05-0.67); in contrast, an unrelated donor was associated with a higher frequency of gastrointestinal GvHD (odds ratio=5.4 (95% confidence interval: 1.6-18.2). One year overall survival (OS) was 74%. In the multivariate Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis, stages 0-II gastrointestinal GvHD (hazards ratio (HR)=0.19), reduced intensity conditioning (HR=0.04) and tacrolimus-sirolimus GvHD prophylaxis (HR=0.06) were all associated with a better OS. In summary, HP infection could have a role in decreasing gastrointestinal GvHD in patients receiving allogeneic HCT from peripheral blood including related and unrelated donors.

Full coding hepatitis E virus genotype 3 genome amplification method.

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) genotype 3 produces zoonotic infection associated with the consumption of infected animals. HEV infections can become chronic in immunocompromised (IC) patients. The viral genome has three well defined open reading frames (ORF1, ORF2 and ORF3) within which various domains and functions have been described. This paper (i) describes a new method of complete sequencing of the HEV coding region through overlapping PCR systems, (ii) establishes a consensus sequence and polymorphic positions (PP) for each domain, and (iii) analyzes the complete coding sequence of an IC patient. With regard to the consensus, a high percentage of PP was observed in protease (PP=19%) and the X domain (PP=22%) within ORF1, the N-terminal region of the S domain (PP=22%) in ORF2, and the P1 (PP=35%) and P2 (PP=25%) domains in ORF3. In contrast, the ORF1 Y, ORF2 S, ORF2 M and ORF3 D1 domains were conserved in the reference sequences (0.40, 1, 0.70 and 0% of PP, respectively). The sequence from the IC patient had more mutations in the RpRp (D1235G, Q1242R, S1454T, V1480I, I1502 V, K1511R, G1373 V, E1442D, V1693 M), the terminal ORF2 S- domain (F10L, S26T, G36S, S70P, A105 V, I113 V), the X domain (T938 M, T856 V, S898A) and the helicase (S1014N, S975T, Q1133 K).