Dosimetric evaluation of modern radiation therapy techniques for left breast in deep-inspiration breath-hold.

PURPOSE: The dosimetric differences between four radiation therapy techniques for left sided whole breast irradiation were evaluated side by side in the same patient population. METHODS: Radiotherapy treatment plans were retrospectively created with Accuray TomoDirect (TD), Elekta Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (E-VMAT), Varian RapidArc (RA) and Field-in-field (FinF) technique for 20 patients, who had received left breast irradiation during deep-inspiration breath-hold. Dose characteristics of planning target volume and organs at risk were compared. RESULTS: The E-VMAT, TD and RA treatment plans had higher target coverage (V95%) than FinF plans (97.7-98.3% vs. 96.6%). The low-dose spillage to contralateral breast and lung was smaller with FinF and TD (mean 0.1 and 0.3 Gy) compared to E-VMAT and RA (mean 0.6 and 0.9 Gy). E-VMAT, RA and TD techniques were more effective than FinF in sparing left anterior descending artery (mean 4.0, 4.2 and 4.7 Gy vs. 6.1 Gy, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In whole breast irradiation TD, E-VMAT and RA plans generated in this study achieved higher dose coverage and sparing of organs from the high dose in the vicinity of the PTV. The advantage of calculated FinF plans is the lowest dose on contralateral organs. The choice of the technique used should be weighted by each institution taking into account the dose characteristics of each technique and its fit with patient anatomy bearing in mind the increased workload of using modulated techniques and the increased beam on time.

Flattening filter free technique in breath-hold treatments of left-sided breast cancer: The effect on beam-on time and dose distributions.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The use of flattening filter free (FFF) beams has potential to speed up deep-inspiration breath-hold treatments. In this study, the beam-on time and dose characteristics of left-sided breast treatment plans with FFF and flattened beams were evaluated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twelve plans were generated for 20 patients. The techniques utilized were volumetric modulated arc therapy with two limited tangential arcs (tVMAT) and tangential intensity modulated radiotherapy with dynamic (dIMRT) as well as step-and-shoot (FinF) dose delivery. Each technique was planned with FFF and flattened beams with 6 and 10MV photons. All plans were irradiated and the beam-on times were measured. Dose characteristics of planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OAR) were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean beam-on times were reduced by 18-39% using FFF. Mean PTV dose coverage was least reduced with tVMAT (0.6-0.8%) compared to dIMRT (4%) and FinF (5.6-9.1%), when FFF beams were used instead of flattened beams. Only small differences were observed in OAR doses between equivalent plans (FFF vs. flattened). CONCLUSIONS: A significant reduction was observed in beam-on time when utilizing FFF beams with tVMAT, dIMRT and FinF. tVMAT was the only technique for which the use of FFF did not degrade the treatment plan dose distributions.