Feasibility of a high-flux anticancer drug screen using a diverse panel of cultured human tumor cell lines.

We describe here the development and implementation of a pilot-scale, in vitro, anticancer drug screen utilizing a panel of 60 human tumor cell lines organized into subpanels representing leukemia, melanoma, and cancers of the lung, colon, kidney, ovary, and central nervous system. The ultimate goal of this disease-oriented screen is to facilitate the discovery of new compounds with potential cell line-specific and/or subpanel-specific antitumor activity. In the current screening protocol, each cell line is inoculated onto microtiter plates, then preincubated for 24-28 hours. Subsequently, test agents are added in five 10-fold dilutions and the culture is incubated for an additional 48 hours. For each test agent, a dose-response profile is generated. End-point determinations of the cell viability or cell growth are performed by in situ fixation of cells, followed by staining with a protein-binding dye, sulforhodamine B (SRB). The SRB binds to the basic amino acids of cellular macromolecules; the solubilized stain is measured spectrophotometrically to determine relative cell growth or viability in treated and untreated cells. Following the pilot screening studies, a screening rate of 400 compounds per week has been consistently achieved.

The ras oncogene-mediated sensitization of human cells to topoisomerase II inhibitor-induced apoptosis.

BACKGROUND: Among the inhibitors of the enzyme topoisomerase II (an important target for chemotherapeutic drugs) tested in the National Cancer Institute's In Vitro Antineoplastic Drug Screen, NSC 284682 (3'-hydroxydaunorubicin) and NSC 659687 [9-hydroxy-5,6-dimethyl-1-(N-[2(dimethylamino)ethyl]carbamoyl)-6H-pyrido -(4,3-b)carbazole] were the only compounds that were more cytotoxic to tumor cells harboring an activated ras oncogene than to tumor cells bearing wild-type ras alleles. Expression of the multidrug resistance proteins P-glycoprotein and MRP (multidrug resistance-associated protein) facilitates tumor cell resistance to topoisomerase II inhibitors. We investigated whether tumor cells with activated ras oncogenes showed enhanced sensitivity to other topoisomerase II inhibitors in the absence of the multidrug-resistant phenotype. METHODS: We studied 20 topoisomerase II inhibitors and individual cell lines with or without activated ras oncogenes and with varying degrees of multidrug resistance. RESULTS: In the absence of multidrug resistance, human tumor cell lines with activated ras oncogenes were uniformly more sensitive to most topoisomerase II inhibitors than were cell lines containing wild-type ras alleles. The compounds NSC 284682 and NSC 659687 were especially effective irrespective of the multidrug resistant phenotype. The ras oncogene-mediated sensitization to topoisomerase II inhibitors was far more prominent with the non-DNA-intercalating epipodophyllotoxins than with the DNA-intercalating inhibitors. This difference in sensitization appears to be related to a difference in apoptotic sensitivity, since the level of DNA damage generated by etoposide (an epipodophyllotoxin derivative) in immortalized human kidney epithelial cells expressing an activated ras oncogene was similar to that in the parental cells, but apoptosis was enhanced only in the former cells. CONCLUSIONS: Activated ras oncogenes appear to enhance the sensitivity of human tumor cells to topoisomerase II inhibitors by potentiating an apoptotic response. Epipodophyllotoxin-derived topoisomerase II inhibitors should be more effective than the DNA-intercalating inhibitors against tumor cells with activated ras oncogenes.

Site of action of two novel pyrimidine biosynthesis inhibitors accurately predicted by the compare program.

The computer algorithm COMPARE provides information regarding the biological mechanism of action of a compound. In this study, excellent correlations were obtained for 2,2'-[3,3'-dimethoxy[1,1'-biphenyl]-4,4'-diyl)diimino]bis- benzoic acid (redoxal) and 1-(p-bromophenyl)-2-methyl-1H- naphth[2,3-d]imidazole-4,9-dione (BNID) and two well-studied dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHOD) inhibitors, dichloroallyl lawsone and brequinar, in terms of antiproliferative activity against tumor cell lines in vitro. When redoxal and BNID were incubated with MOLT-4 cells for 72 hr, 50% growth inhibition was achieved at 0.7 and 3.5 microM, respectively. After 24 hr of incubation, pyrimidine triphosphate pools were shown to be decreased by 50% by redoxal (1 microM) and BNID (0.25 microM). Addition of either uridine (50 microM) or cytidine (100 microM) antagonized the cellular cytotoxicity caused by either drug; uridine corrected the UTP and CTP deficit, whereas cytidine corrected only the CTP deficit. Exposure of MOLT-4 cells to a 1 microM concentration of either drug for 18 hr followed by a 1-hr exposure to [14C]bicarbonate showed a 97% decrease of incorporation of [14C] into pyrimidine triphosphates accompanied by a 91- and 82-fold increase in radioactive incorporation into L-dihydroorotate and N-carbamyl-L-aspartate, respectively. By direct exposure of DHOD prepared from MOLT-4 cell mitochondria to a range of concentrations of the two drugs, apparent Ki values of 0.33 microM (redoxal) and 0.53 microM (BNID) were determined. These data provide direct evidence for inhibition of DHOD by redoxal and BNID in MOLT-4 lymphoblasts.

UCN-01 enhances the in vitro toxicity of clinical agents in human tumor cell lines.

UCN-01 is undergoing Phase I evaluation and is a candidate for combination strategies in the clinic. UCN-01 has been shown to have a variety of effects on cellular targets and the cell cycle. It has also been reported to sensitize cells to several clinical drugs in vitro, possibly in a manner related to p53 status. Thus, combinations of UCN-01 with a series of clinical agents in variety of cell lines have been investigated in vitro. Certain cell lines demonstrated synergistic interactions with combinations of UCN-01 (20-150 nM) and thiotepa, mitomycin C, cisplatin, melphalan, topotecan, gemcitabine, fludarabine or 5-fluorouracil. In contrast, UCN-01 combinations with the antimitotic agents, paclitaxel and vincristine, or topoisomerase II inhibitors, adriamycin and etoposide, did not result in synergy, only in additive toxicity. Cells with non-functional p53 were significantly more susceptible to the supra-additive effects of certain DNA-damaging agents and UCN-01 combinations, than cells expressing functional p53 activity. In contrast, there was no significant relationship between p53 status and susceptibility to synergy between antimetabolites and UCN-01. The mechanism behind the observed synergy appeared unrelated to effects on protein kinase C or abrogation of the cell cycle in G2. Moreover, increased apoptosis did not fully explain the supradditive response. These data indicate that UCN-01 sensitizes a variety of cell lines to certain DNA-damaging agents (frequently covalent DNA-binding drugs) and antimetabolites in vitro, but the mechanism underlying this interaction remains undefined.