Binding objects to their spatiotemporal context: Age gradient and neuropsychological correlates of What-Where-When task performance.

A number of recent studies have shown that the ability to accurately recall bound object and spatiotemporal aspects of an experienced event develops gradually in children and is greatly impaired in the elderly, reflecting developmental discontinuities in the integrity of the underlying medial temporal lobe network. Using a novel What-Where-When (WWW) visuospatial reconstruction task, the experiential memory performance of a group of healthy older adults (aged 60-80) was compared to that of a group of younger adults (aged 20-40). Both groups were equated on their general cognitive ability, their executive functioning, and on the presence of depression, anxiety, and stress symptomatology. As hypothesized, the performance of the older adults in the binding task was significantly lower, with younger participants recalling three times the amount of bound object and spatiotemporal triads than their older counterparts. Psychomotor speed was found to be lower in older adults and was the only neuropsychological index to significantly affect success on the WWW binding task. Based on this and other relevant studies, the selective associative memory impairment obtained using a non-verbal What-Where-When paradigm emerges as a marker for the detection of early pre-clinical signs of experiential memory pathology.

Forced social isolation and lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic: depression, anxiety, trauma-distress and coping mechanisms of a Greek sample.

Aim: The COVID-19 outbreak escalated into a global pandemic, pushing many governments around the world to impose measures affecting all aspects of life. Similar to other countries, Greece adopted social restriction, lockdowns, and quarantines to reduce transmission from person-to-person. This cross-sectional study investigated the association between social restriction measures, an mental health and coping strategies employed by a Greek adult sample. Subject and methods: An online questionnaire was used to collect data during the second national lockdown (February to May 2021). A total of 650 participants (M age 33.13, 71.5% female) comprised the final sample. Results: The results show 21.3% of respondents reported moderate-to-extremely severe anxiety, 33% moderate-to-extremely severe depression, 31.8% moderate-to-severe stress, and 38% clinically significant trauma-related distress. Hierarchical linear regression analyses revealed that the strongest contributors to adverse mental health outcomes were being female, of younger age, experiencing increases in verbal arguments at home, being separated from family and close friends, and being unable to afford enough or healthy food. Lastly, participants reported moving away from social support and into more individual strength and resilience-based coping strategies to cope with challenges. Conclusion: These findings suggest that in addition to the detrimental effects on physical health, social restriction measures related to COVID-19 also imposed a heavy psychological burden on the population via forced social isolation, which, by design, increased not only physical distancing but also psychological distancing between people. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10389-023-01907-3.

Sense of direction and conscientiousness as predictors of performance in the Euclidean travelling salesman problem.

A salesperson wishes to visit a number of cities before returning home using the shortest possible route, whilst only visiting each city once. This optimization problem, called the Travelling Salesman Problem, is difficult to solve using exhaustive algorithms due to the exponential growth in the number of possible solutions. Interestingly, when presented in Euclidean space (ETSP), humans quickly find good solutions. Past studies, however, are in disagreement whether human solutions are impacted by the participant's ability to process figural effects in the graph geometry. In this study, we used principal component analysis to combine two correlated [r = 0.37, p < 0.01] self-assessed personality measures, i.e., a participant's sense of direction and a participant's level of conscientiousness, onto a single impulsiveness/cautiousness dimension. We then showed, using simple linear regression, that this new dimension is a significant predictor [R2 = 0.12, p < 0.01] of the number of edge crossings that occur in human ETSP solutions, a key metric of graph optimality. Our study provides evidence to suggest that human solutions to the ETSP are significantly affected by individual differences, including personality and cognitive traits.

Where is the aorta? Is it worth palpating the aorta prior to laparoscopy?

BACKGROUND: Injury to major retroperitoneal vessels is the most catastrophic complication of laparoscopy. Knowledge of the site of the aortic bifurcation prior to inserting the umbilical port would be expected to reduce the risk of this type of injury. The aim of the study is to determine the feasibility of identifying the aortic bifurcation by palpation prior to the operation. METHODS: We studied 100 patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery or laparotomy. After prepping and draping, the operating surgeon felt for the aortic bifurcation to determine its position in relation to the umbilicus. We then related our findings to the height, weight, and body mass index of the patient. RESULTS: The aorta could not be palpated in 15% of cases, including almost 2/3 of women who were obese (body mass index >30). In the remaining 85% cases, where the aorta was palpable, the bifurcation was above the level of the umbilicus in 30 (35%) cases, at the umbilicus in 45 (53%) cases, and below in 10 (12%) cases. We did not find any significant effect of body mass index, height, or weight on the level of the aortic bifurcation by palpation. No vascular injury occurred in the laparoscopic cases during the study. CONCLUSIONS: The aortic bifurcation is palpable in the majority of women undergoing surgery, including 93% of those with a low or normal body mass index who are at higher risk of vascular injury. We recommend the routine palpation for the aortic bifurcation as a simple means to reduce the risk of injury to a major retroperitoneal vessel.