Predicting survival of periviable fetuses using NICHD fetal heart rate categories.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether National Institute of Child Health and Human Health and Development (NICHD) fetal heart rate categories were predictive of neonatal survival in periviable pregnancies. METHODS: We reviewed the charts of 57 infants delivered at 23 and 24 weeks' gestation. Fetal heart rate tracings were evaluated following the NICHD 2008 criteria, using the acceleration height of 10 bpm and duration of 10 s. Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed using survival, fetal morbidities, and cord pH <7.1 as dependent variables. Independent variables included fetal heart rate category, mode of delivery, resuscitation, and histological chorioamnionitis. Outcomes of infants delivered at 23 and 24 weeks were also compared. RESULTS: In 23-week pregnancies, fetal heart rate category 2 was associated with improved short-term survival compared to category 3 (OR 1.3, 95% CI 0.11-15.7). Cesarean delivery and histological chorioamnionitis were not predictive of survival [(OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.04-7.1, and OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.02-6.85), respectively]. Long-term survival for infants born at 23 and 24 weeks was 8% and 56%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The NICHD fetal heart rate category during labor may be associated with survival for infants born at 23 and 24 weeks of gestation. Cesarean delivery was not associated with improved survival.

Utility of two-dimensional echocardiography in pregnancy and post-partum period and impact on management in an inner city hospital.

AIM: Evaluate the practice and appropriateness of requesting echocardiograms in patients with suspected or documented cardiac disease during gestation and puerperium, using the American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF) appropriateness criteria, in conjunction with clinical picture. METHODS: Retrospective observational study, to analyze echocardiograms performed during pregnancy and puerperium at a teaching hospital from 2001 to 2006 for appropriateness criteria and studying its impact on management. Sixty-seven patients pregnant or in the puerperal stage had an echocardiogram performed during that period; 58 met our criteria for inclusion. RESULTS: Based on clinical information and criteria of the ACCF, 51 of the 58 echocardiograms met the appropriateness criteria. Of the 51, results of 40 impacted on management; 14 of the 40 echocardiograms that had an impact were abnormal. CONCLUSIONS: Although the ACCF appropriateness criteria have not been specifically studied in pregnancy, our study demonstrates that the criteria are applicable if used appropriately in pregnancy. Most indications in our study correlated with the appropriateness criteria. Although most findings were normal, information from echocardiograms impacted on management in the majority of patients, contributing to therapeutic decision-making. The reliability of echocardiograms performed according to appropriate criteria to assist clinical decisions was excellent even in patients with physiologic cardiovascular changes.