The Italian multiorgan donor cancer screening protocol: 2002-2005 experience.

BACKGROUND: We describe the results of the application of the Italian donor cancer screening protocol to all the 7608 candidate multiorgan donors presented in Italy in 2002-2005. METHODS: All suspect findings raised in the two presurgical and surgical phases of the protocol were investigated by extemporary pathologic evaluation. Donors were classified as standard risk (no transmissible risk); nonstandard risk (low-risk of transmission, eligibility restricted to certified clinical emergencies pending informed consent); and unacceptable risk (unconditional exclusion because of high-risk pathologies). RESULTS: The protocol was successfully implemented for all 7608 candidates. In addition to 8 (0.1%) independent exclusions, clinical suspicion of cancer was raised for 337 (4.6%) donors. According to pathological examination 198 donors (2.6%) were judged at unacceptable risk of tumor transmission; 80 (1%) were included in the "standard risk". Used standard risk and nonstandard risk donors provided a total of 241 organs in 231 recipients. Although no suspect was raised after implementation of the protocol, a malignant tumor was discovered after organ transplantation in 14 (0.2%) donors. All the recipients transplanted with organs from ascertained nonstandard risk donors or from neoplastic donors who donated by accident have been carefully followed. At the time of most recent follow-up no donor/recipient tumor transmission has been reported. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the multiorgan cancer screening protocol is feasible at a national level in Italy. In view of the increasing demand for organs our protocol provides a useful tool for rationalization of the use of organs from neoplastic marginal donors.

Criteria and terms for certified suitability of organ donors: assumptions and operational strategies in Italy.

Limited access to scarce resources, such as organs for transplantation, has increasingly prompted the use of elderly donors, with a consequent growth of possible risk factors linked to their particular features. Acceptable organ quality must therefore be guaranteed, without exposing recipients to unacceptable risks. For this reason, a set of guidelines for assessing donor suitability has been drawn up. This document standardizes the operative steps in the donor evaluation process and provides precise instructions for center staff. A pool of experts is available round the clock to offer advice on doubtful clinical cases. Such measures have allowed more effective use of available donors for transplantation.

Liver transplantation in Italy: analysis of risk factors associated with graft outcome.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the graft outcome after liver transplantation in Italy in the years 1995 to 2000. METHODS: We performed a longitudinal study with follow-up at 3 months, 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years on 1987 liver grafts. The effect of several variables on graft survival was also analyzed. RESULTS: Several variables affect graft survival: Donor and recipient older age, gender mismatching, prolonged cold ischemia time, acute hepatic necrosis, and retransplantation are reported to significantly affect liver graft survival. Donors older than 60 years show a relative risk of 1.59 (95% CI, 1.23-2.05) compared with donors with an age between 19 and 60 years; recipients older than 50 years show a relative risk of 1.29 (95% CI, 1.04-1.60) compared with recipients aged 19 to 50 years. A cold ischemia time of 12 hours or longer doubled the risk of failure (relative risk = 2.01, 95% CI, 1.36-2.96) compared with a cold ischemia time of less than 6 hours. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that the overall quality of liver transplantation in Italy is satisfying and comparable to the outcome reported by international registries. Follow-up studies on large numbers of liver transplants are useful to define predictors of outcome, and subsequently modify the criteria for organ allocation.

Analysis of the complex effect of donor's age on survival of subjects who underwent heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Only half of the patients waiting for a heart transplant undergo surgery, whereas several patients continue to die while on the waiting list. Donor organ availability still represents a major problem with respect to reducing the length of the cardiac transplant waiting list. One option to improve donor availability is the use of so called "marginal donors." The aims of the present study are to analyze the short-mid term survival of cardiac transplanted patients in Italy, and investigate the effect of donor age on prognosis. METHODS: A prospective cohort study including all adult patients who underwent heart transplantations in Italy was used to analyze the main factors contributing to organ survival. RESULTS: From 1995-2002, 2,504 adult subjects underwent a cardiac transplant, and were followed up for a period of 540.9 days. Overall, 1-year graft survival was 83.1%. Organs from donors older than 55 years had a lower survival than organs from younger donors. By multivariate analysis, both donor's and recipient's age seem to be important determinants of graft survival. A more sophisticated analysis shows that the trend of the risk of graft failure according to donor's age is not linear, with a peak at age 47.3 years, and differs according to sex. CONCLUSIONS: Results from the present analysis suggest that the association between heart transplant survival and donor's age is not a linear one, but follows a complex mathematical model, with influences of sex, at least in our sample.

Kidney graft survival in Italy and factors influencing it.

PURPOSE: National registry data are often a suitable basis for examination of transplant outcomes. Using data supplied by the Italian National Transplant Registry, established in 1995, we performed the first nationwide analysis of this kind. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 4893 recipients of cadaveric kidneys transplanted in all Italian centers from 1995 through 2000 was done to study 5-year graft survival. The association between some donor and recipient variables and outcomes in renal transplantation was analyzed. Graft survival was 93% at 3 months, 89% at 1 year, 82% at 3 years, and 80% at 5 years after transplantation. RESULTS: A significant association between graft survival and donor age (old vs young, relative risk [RR] = 1.62, 95% CI 1.27-2.06) and recipient age (old vs young, RR = 1.25, 95% CI 1.02-1.53). Graft survival was also associated with cold ischemia time (24-36 hours, RR= 1.39, 95% CI 1.05-1.85 and >36 hours, RR= 1.94, 95% CI 1.32-2.86 vs 0-24 hours) and donor/recipient sex mismatch (female/male vs male/male, RR= 1.50, 95% CI 1.17-1.93). CONCLUSION: The quality of kidney transplantation in Italy is satisfactory and is comparable to that in other developed countries. Furthermore, our experience confirms that both donor and recipient factors are major determinants of renal allograft function.

Strategies for evaluation of suitable donors: Italian experience.

Italy was lacking standardised procedures for donor safety evaluation. We developed practice guidelines, while a panel of experts coordinated by the National Transplant Centre, is available 24 hours a day to support decisions in difficult cases. The guidelines identify five levels of risk and give recommendations for the utilization of donors with HBV and HCV infections as well as for malignancies with negligible or very low risk of transmission. In conclusion we aim to standardize the process of donor evaluation across Italy, to increase the pool of utilised donors and to reduce the risk of communicable disease transmission.

Transplant quality in Italy: analysis of the 1995-2000 period.

Evaluation of outcomes is a major step in quality assessment of any health process. In the transplant field, the evaluation of outcome is extremely important for both patients' growing demand for health and for the joint commitment the transplant process requires. In this study, the outcome of 12,647 transplants, carried out between 1995 and 2000 were analysed. Graft survival at 5 years was 79% for kidney, 67% for liver, 72% for heart and 38% for lung. Patient survival was 92% for kidney, 76% for liver, 72% for heart and 38% for lung. In comparison to other international case records [Collaborative Transplant Study (CTS) and The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS)], results are similar or even better for all transplant programmes. As a whole, survival after solid organ transplant in Italy ranks among the best for both donations and transplantation. The quality of transplants carried out is above European standards. Nevertheless, the growing health needs of patients require improvement in both the procurement process and in the use of available organs.