Congenital toxoplasma infection: monthly prenatal screening decreases transmission rate and improves clinical outcome at age 3 years.

BACKGROUND: Toxoplasma infection during pregnancy exposes the fetus to risks of congenital infection and sequelae that depend heavily on gestational age (GA) at time of infection. Accurate risk estimates by GA are necessary to counsel parents and improve clinical decisions. METHODS: We analyzed data from pregnant women diagnosed with acute Toxoplasma infection in Lyon (France) from 1987 to 2008 and assessed how the risks of congenital toxoplasmosis and of clinical signs at age 3 years vary depending on GA at the time of maternal infection. RESULTS: Among 2048 mother-infant pairs, 93.2% of mothers received prenatal treatment and 513 (24.7%) fetuses were infected. Because of a significant reduction in risk since 1992 when monthly screening was introduced (59.4% vs 46.6% at 26 GA weeks; P = .038), probabilities of infection were estimated on the basis of maternal infections diagnosed after mid-1992 (n = 1624). Probabilities of congenital infection were <10% for maternal infections before 12 weeks of gestation, rose to 20.0% at 19 weeks, and then continued increasing to 52.3% and almost 70% at 28 and 39 GA weeks, respectively. Because of a significant reduction in risk of clinical signs of congenital toxoplasmosis in infected children born from mothers diagnosed after 1995 when polymerase chain reaction testing on amniotic fluid was initiated (87/794 vs 46/1150; P = .012), probabilities of clinical signs at 3 years were estimated based on 1015 maternal infections diagnosed after 1995 including 207 infected children, with symptoms in 46 (22.2%). CONCLUSIONS: These analyses demonstrated that introduction of monthly prenatal screening and improvement in antenatal diagnosis were associated with a significant reduction in the rate of congenital infection and a better outcome at 3 years of age in infected children. Our updated estimates will improve individual management and counseling in areas where genotype II Toxoplasma is predominant.

Written information to patients in clinical genetics: what's the impact?

In all countries of the European Union, oral information must be given to the patient. Written information is generally optional, but physicians are tending more and more to send a copy of the clinical report to the patient. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the impact on patients of sending them written information after a clinical consultation in a French genetics department. During a period of three months, two geneticists and one genetic counselor offered to send each patient a copy of the letter sent to their general practitioners. A questionnaire was sent with this copy. Three hundred and seventy-five patients were seen and 64% of the questionnaires were sent back. Of these, 99% showed that this practice was considered a good idea, and 80% reported that the letter reflected the clinical aspects well. Seventy-two percent thought that receiving this letter improved their understanding of the clinical situation. In general, patients found the words understandable (83%), too medical (20%) or even shocking (3%). Sixty-three percent said that they would have asked their general practitioner to give them the letter. Their main motivation for wanting a copy of this letter was to remember the information in the future, to have the information to pass on to other physicians involved in their health in the future, or to have information concerning the family. Finally, 58% would have preferred a letter sent specifically to them rather than a copy, and suggestions for the contents of such a letter should be further studied.