Cell therapy for full-thickness wounds: are fetal dermal cells a potential source?

The application of autologous dermal fibroblasts has been shown to improve burn wound healing. However, a major hurdle is the availability of sufficient healthy skin as a cell source. We investigated fetal dermal cells as an alternative source for cell-based therapy for skin regeneration. Human (hFF), porcine fetal (pFF) or autologous dermal fibroblasts (AF) were seeded in a collagen-elastin substitute (Novomaix, NVM), which was applied in combination with an autologous split thickness skin graft (STSG) to evaluate the effects of these cells on wound healing in a porcine excisional wound model. Transplantation of wounds with NVM+hFF showed an increased influx of inflammatory cells (e.g., neutrophils, macrophages, CD4(+) and CD8(+) lymphocytes) compared to STSG, acellular NVM (Acell-NVM) and NVM+AF at post-surgery days 7 and/or 14. Wounds treated with NVM+pFF presented only an increase in CD8(+) lymphocyte influx. Furthermore, reduced alpha-smooth muscle actin (αSMA) expression in wound areas and reduced contraction of the wounds was observed with NVM+AF compared to Acell-NVM. Xenogeneic transplantation of NVM+hFF increased αSMA expression in wounds compared to NVM+AF. An improved scar quality was observed for wounds treated with NVM+AF compared to Acell-NVM, NVM+hFF and NVM+pFF at day 56. In conclusion, application of autologous fibroblasts improved the overall outcome of wound healing in comparison to fetal dermal cells and Acell-NVM, whereas application of fetal dermal fibroblasts in NVM did not improve wound healing of full-thickness wounds in a porcine model. Although human fetal dermal cells demonstrated an increased immune response, this did not seem to affect scar quality.

Associations between traumatic stress symptoms, pain and bio-active components in burn wounds.

OBJECTIVE: Pain and traumatic stress symptoms often co-occur. Evidence suggests that the neuropeptide oxytocine and pro-inflammatory cytokines are associated with both stress and pain. The aim of this pilot study was to explore relations between self-reported pain and traumatic stress, oxytocin and three cytokines in burn wounds. METHODS: An observational study in three burn centres was performed. Patients were invited to participate in the study when deep dermal injury was suspected. Patients completed the Impact of Event Scale (IES), a self-report questionnaire assessing traumatic stress symptoms, and they rated their pain the day prior to surgery. During surgery, eschar (i.e., burned tissue) was collected and stored at -80 ° C until analysis. When the data collection was complete, oxytocin and cytokine levels were analysed. RESULTS: Eschar from 53 patients was collected. Pain and stress scores were available from 42 and 36 patients respectively. Spearman correlational analyses showed an association between lower oxytocin levels at wound site and a higher total IES score (r = -0.37) and pain (r = -0.32). Mann-Whitney U tests comparing groups scoring high or low on pain or stress confirmed these associations. CONCLUSION: These analyses lend support to a hormonal pathway that may explain how psychological distress affects pain at skin level in patients with traumatic stress symptoms.

Assessing blood flow, microvasculature, erythema and redness in hypertrophic scars: A cross sectional study showing different features that require precise definitions.

BACKGROUND: In hypertrophic scar assessment, laser Doppler imaging (LDI), colorimetry and subjective assessment (POSAS) can be used to evaluate blood flow, erythema and redness, respectively. In addition, the microvasculature (i.e. presence of microvessels) can be determined by immunohistochemistry. These measurement techniques are frequently used in clinical practice and/or in research to evaluate treatment response and monitor scar development. However, until now it has not been tested to what extent the outcomes of these techniques are associated, whilst the outcome terms are frequently used interchangeably or replaced by the umbrella term 'vascularization'. This is confusing, as every technique seems to measure a specific feature. Therefore, we evaluated the correlations of the four measurement techniques. METHODS: We included 32 consecutive patients, aged ≥18 years, who underwent elective resection of a hypertrophic scar. Pre-operatively, we performed LDI (measuring blood flow), colorimetry (measuring erythema) and the POSAS (subjective redness) within the predefined scar area of interest (∼1.5cm). Subsequently, the scar was excised and the area of interest was sent for immunohistochemistry, to determine the presence of microvessels. RESULTS: Only a statistically significant correlation was found between erythema values (colorimetry) and subjective redness assessment (POSAS) (r=0.403, p=0.030). We found no correlations between the outcomes of LDI, immunohistochemistry and colorimetry. CONCLUSIONS: Blood flow, the presence of microvessels and erythema appear to be different hypertrophic scar features because they show an absence of correlation. Therefore, in the field of scar assessment, these outcome terms cannot be used interchangeably. In addition, we conclude that the term 'vascularization' does not seem appropriate to serve as an umbrella term. The use of precise definitions in research as well as in clinical practice is recommended.

Digital image analysis versus clinical assessment of wound epithelialization: a validation study.

To evaluate the progress in wound healing, wound assessment is mandatory. Epithelialization is traditionally assessed subjectively by the clinician. In a previous study, subjective assessment of epithelialization was shown to be reliable. In this study, reliability of epithelialization measured by digital image analysis was investigated and then, we validated the subjective evaluation by comparing this assessment to measurements with digital image analysis. Clinicians assessed epithelialization in 50 burn wounds that were treated with a split skin graft. Epithelialization of these wounds was also measured by three observers using digital image analysis. Reliability of digital image analysis was tested using the intraclass correlation (IC). To test validity, subjective clinical assessment was correlated with digital image analysis (IC). The results showed that interobserver reliability of epithelialization measured by digital image analysis was good (IC coefficient 0.74). Subjective clinical assessment of epithelialization showed a strong correlation with digital image analysis (IC coefficient 0.80). In conclusion, subjective clinical evaluation of wound epithelialization is as good as an objective measure, in this study digital image analysis. Since digital image analysis is more time-consuming, we recommend the use of the subjective evaluation for daily practice.