Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Reprod Med ; 51(8): 635-41, 2006 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16967634

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To collect pilot data on the efficacy of intramuscular botulinum toxin type A (BTX/A) injection into the levator ani muscles to relieve coital pain, reduce pelvic floor tension and instability, and reduce vestibular hyperalgesia in vestibulodynia. STUDY DESIGN: Two subjects meeting diagnostic criteria for vestibulodynia were treated with 20 units and 40 units of BTX/A at 12-week intervals. Outcomes included a visual analogue scale (VAS), weekly coital pain diaries, surface electromyography (sEMG) and a vulvar algesiometer. RESULTS: BTX/A modestly reduced coital pain in 1 patient and was ineffective in the other. Pelvic floor hypertonicity and variability were markedly reduced in both patients, but negligible changes occurred in vestibular hyperalgesia. The patient with greater pelvic floor tension had more of a reduction in diary-rated coital pain 2 weeks after the injection (29% vs. 9%) and on the VAS at 12 weeks (15% vs. 3%). CONCLUSION: BTX/A injections may be effective in reducing coital pain in vestibulodynia with levator ani tenderness but have little effect on vestibular allodynia. The relationship between pelvic floor hypertonicity and decreased coital pain suggests that vestibulodynia may be a variant of chronic regional pain syndrome. The dose and volume of BTX/A injected may be related to the degree of relief.


Asunto(s)
Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/uso terapéutico , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Diafragma Pélvico/patología , Enfermedades de la Vulva/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Enfermedad Crónica , Coito/fisiología , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Humanos , Dimensión del Dolor , Proyectos Piloto , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 192(5): 1637-42, 2005 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15902170

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to estimate the prevalence and impact upon quality of life of anal incontinence (AI) in women aged 18 to 65. STUDY DESIGN: Consecutive women presenting for general gynecologic care were given a bowel function questionnaire. Women with AI were prompted to complete the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI) and Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (FIQL). RESULTS: The cohort was composed of 457 women with a mean age of 39.9 +/- 11 years. AI prevalence was 28.4% (95% CI 24.4-32.8). After logistic regression, IBS (OR 3.22, 1.75-5.93), constipation (OR 2.11, 1.22-3.63), age (OR 1.05, 1.03-1.07), and BMI (OR 1.04, 1.01-1.08) remained significant risk factors. The mean FISI score was 20.4 +/- 12.4. Women with only flatal incontinence scored higher, and women with liquid loss scored lower on all 4 scales of the FIQL. CONCLUSION: AI is prevalent in women seeking benign gynecologic care, and liquid stool incontinence has the greatest impact upon quality of life.


Asunto(s)
Incontinencia Fecal/epidemiología , Incontinencia Fecal/fisiopatología , Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Envejecimiento , Índice de Masa Corporal , Estudios de Cohortes , Estreñimiento/complicaciones , Atención a la Salud , Diarrea/fisiopatología , Incontinencia Fecal/complicaciones , Femenino , Ginecología , Humanos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/complicaciones , Modelos Logísticos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
3.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 189(3): 688-91, 2003 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14526294

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether knowledge of resident's identity affects the evaluation of surgical skills. STUDY DESIGN: During an objective structured assessment of technical skills, 33 residents in obstetrics and gynecology who performed 10 surgical skills were videotaped with two digital cameras simultaneously. One camera videotaped "hands only," concealing resident identity; the other camera videotaped from the "waist up," revealing identity. Residents wore opaque gowns and gloves. Four faculty reviewers with previous clinical experience with the residents scored the "hands only" videos first. The scoring was based on the total of a global rating scale and a task-specific checklist. RESULTS: The combined scores for all reviewers was significantly different between the two views (P=.03). When the video tapes were analyzed individually, two reviewers scored the views differently; one reviewer scored higher, whereas the other reviewer scored lower. CONCLUSION: Bias can occur in evaluation of surgical skills but is dependent on the individual reviewer. Resident identification can alter the score, depending on the evaluator.


Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Evaluación Educacional/métodos , Cirugía General/educación , Internado y Residencia , Prejuicio , Grabación de Cinta de Video , Femenino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos , Ginecología/educación , Humanos , Masculino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Obstétricos , Obstetricia/educación , Estudiantes de Medicina
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda