[Autologous fascia pubovaginal slings in women with stress urinary incontinence at high risk of mesh/device-related complications]. / Bandelette aponévrotique pubovaginale pour incontinence urinaire d'effort chez les femmes à risque de complications prothétiques.

INTRODUCTION: Very popular in many parts of the world, autologous fascial pubovaginal sling (AFPVS) remains marginally used in France. However, it may be of particular interest in patients carrying a high risk of mesh-related or device-related related complications. The aim of the present series was to report the outcomes of AFPVS in this high-risk population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The charts of all female patients who underwent a fascial sling for SUI at a single academic center between April 2019 and May 2021 were reviewed retrospectively. Only patients deemed at high-risk of device/mesh related complications were included in the present analysis: female with a neurological condition who were doing clean intermittent catheterization (CIC), female with SUI after radical cystectomy and ileal neobladder, female with urethral/bladder extrusion of any synthetic material placed for SUI. Success was defined as complete resolution of SUI at 3 months. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were included in this study: 13 rectus fascia slings and 3 fascia lata slings. The success rate was 56.3% (9/16 patients). Four patients were improved but not completely dry (25%). Two patients had major postoperative complications (i.e. Clavien grade 3 or higher, 11.2%). Two patients had a persisting significant post-void residual (PVR) postoperatively, managed by self-catheterization (transition to self-catheterization at 3 months: 2/8, 25%). CONCLUSION: The use of autologous fascia pubovaginal sling is an interesting option in female SUI patients with high risk of device/mesh related complications with satisfactory functional outcomes. LEVEL OF PROOF: 4.

[Female voiding dysfunction: Clean intermittent catheterization is not the only option]. / Troubles de la vidange vésicale chez la femme : l'autosondage n'est pas la seule solution.

Female voiding dysfunction exists but are largely underdiagnosed, especially in France. They can result from two different mechanisms: detrusor underactivity or bladder outlet obstruction, with very different pathophysiology and therapeutic management. There are many different therapeutic options, including surgical treatments, to offer as alternative to clean intermittent catheterization which are often burdensome for patients. Seeking voiding dysfunction in female patients with lower urinary tract symptoms and searching for their etiology to tackle it could lead to a paradigm change in these women: from standardized treatment to individualized treatment. In their practice, nurses can detect warning symptoms suspect of voiding dysfunction, and have thus a role to play in the improvement of patients' screening, education other healthcare providers, and management of female voiding dysfunction.

[Urodynamics: All the nurse needs to know]. / Bilan urodynamique : tout ce que l'infirmier(e) doit savoir.

Urodynamic (UD) is an exam intended to explore the mechanisms underlying lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) or urinary incontinence (UI). It involves the measurement of bladder and sphincter pressures using uretrovesical and rectal catheters with pressure transducers, but also the measurement of urinary flow and bladder sensation during filling. UD is far from being systematic in the assessment of LUTS or UI and must seek to tackle a specific clinical or therapeutic question. Thus, history taking, physical examination, voiding diary and questionnaires are essential prerequisites to UD per se. UD steps include a free (unintubated) uroflowmetry, a cystometry, post-void residual measurement±an urethral profilometry, a pressure-flow study or sensitization tests. The pressures are set to zero before to start the study and the validity of the equipment is tested. This control is continued throughout the procedure to ensure the quality of the recording. Any event (e.g., urine leakage, change of position, urgency) is noted during the study. A final report is made by the doctor. The competence of the nurse ensures the reliability, reproducibility and interpretability of the UD study and the nurse's humanity guarantee f an atmosphere as favourable as possible for this uncomfortable and invasive test.