RESUMEN
Seasonally breeding animals undergo shifts in physiology and behavior in response to changes in photoperiod (day length). Interestingly, some species, such as Siberian hamsters (Phodopus sungorus), are more aggressive during the short-day photoperiods of the non-breeding season, despite gonadal regression. While our previous data suggest that Siberian hamsters employ a 'seasonal switch' from gonadal to adrenal regulation of aggression during short-day photoperiods, there is emerging evidence that the gut microbiome, an environment of symbiotic bacteria within the gastrointestinal tract, may also change seasonally and modulate social behaviors. The goal of this study was to compare seasonal shifts in the gut microbiome, circulating levels of adrenal dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and aggression in male and female Siberian hamsters. Hamsters were housed in either long-day (LD) or short-day (SD) photoperiods for 9â weeks. Fecal samples were collected and behaviors were recorded following 3, 6 and 9â weeks of housing, and circulating DHEA was measured at week 9. SD females that were responsive to changes in photoperiod (SD-R), but not SD-R males, displayed increased aggression following 9â weeks of treatment. SD-R males and females also exhibited distinct changes in the relative abundance of gut bacterial phyla and families, yet showed no change in circulating DHEA. The relative abundance of some bacterial families (e.g. Anaeroplasmataceae in females) was associated with aggression in SD-R but not LD or SD non-responder (SD-NR) hamsters after 9â weeks of treatment. Collectively, this study provides insight into the complex role of the microbiome in regulating social behavior in seasonally breeding species.
Asunto(s)
Agresión , Deshidroepiandrosterona/sangre , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Phodopus/microbiología , Phodopus/fisiología , Fotoperiodo , Animales , Femenino , MasculinoRESUMEN
Disruption of Eph-ephrin bidirectional signaling leads to human congenital and age-related cataracts, but the mechanisms for these opacities in the eye lens remain unclear. Eph receptors bind to ephrin ligands on neighboring cells to induce canonical ligand-mediated signaling. The EphA2 receptor also signals non-canonically without ligand binding in cancerous cells, leading to epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). We have previously shown that the receptor EphA2 and the ligand ephrin-A5 have diverse functions in maintaining lens transparency in mice. Loss of ephrin-A5 leads to anterior cataracts due to EMT. Surprisingly, both canonical and non-canonical EphA2 activation are present in normal wild-type lenses and in the ephrin-A5 knockout lenses. Canonical EphA2 signaling is localized exclusively to lens epithelial cells and does not change with age. Non-canonical EphA2 signaling is in both epithelial and fiber cells and increases significantly with age. We hypothesize that canonical ligand-dependent EphA2 signaling is required for the morphogenesis and organization of hexagonal equatorial epithelial cells while non-canonical ligand-independent EphA2 signaling is needed for complex membrane interdigitations that change during fiber cell differentiation and maturation. This is the first demonstration of non-canonical EphA2 activation in a non-cancerous tissue or cell and suggests a possible physiological function for ligand-independent EphA2 signaling.
RESUMEN
The lens is a transparent and ellipsoid organ in the anterior chamber of the eye that changes shape to finely focus light onto the retina to form a clear image. The bulk of this tissue comprises specialized, differentiated fiber cells that have a hexagonal cross section and extend from the anterior to the posterior poles of the lens. These long and skinny cells are tightly opposed to neighboring cells and have complex interdigitations along the length of the cell. The specialized interlocking structures are required for normal biomechanical properties of the lens and have been extensively described using electron microscopy techniques. This protocol demonstrates the first method to preserve and immunostain singular as well as bundles of mouse lens fiber cells to allow the detailed localization of proteins within these complexly shaped cells. The representative data show staining of the peripheral, differentiating, mature, and nuclear fiber cells across all regions of the lens. This method can potentially be used on fiber cells isolated from lenses of other species.
Asunto(s)
Cristalino , Lentes , Ratones , Animales , Microscopía Electrónica , Coloración y Etiquetado , Técnica del Anticuerpo FluorescenteRESUMEN
The eye lens is a transparent, ellipsoid organ in the anterior chamber of the eye that is required for fine focusing of light onto the retina to transmit a clear image. Cataracts, defined as any opacity in the lens, remains the leading cause of blindness in the world. Recent studies in humans and mice indicate that Eph-ephrin bidirectional signaling is important for maintaining lens transparency. Specifically, mutations and polymorphisms in the EphA2 receptor and the ephrin-A5 ligand have been linked to congenital and age-related cataracts. It is unclear what other variants of Ephs and ephrins are expressed in the lens or whether there is preferential expression in epithelial vs. fiber cells. We performed a detailed analysis of Eph receptor and ephrin ligand mRNA transcripts in whole mouse lenses, epithelial cell fractions, and fiber cell fractions using a new RNA isolation method. We compared control samples with EphA2 knockout (KO) and ephrin-A5 KO samples. Our results revealed the presence of transcripts for 12 out of 14 Eph receptors and 8 out of 8 ephrin ligands in various fractions of lens cells. Using specific primer sets, RT-PCR, and sequencing, we verified the variant of each gene that is expressed, and we found two epithelial-cell-specific genes. Surprisingly, we also identified one Eph receptor variant that is expressed in KO lens fibers but is absent from control lens fibers. We also identified one low expression ephrin variant that is only expressed in ephrin-A5 control samples. These results indicate that the lens expresses almost all Ephs and ephrins, and there may be many receptor-ligand pairs that play a role in lens homeostasis.
Asunto(s)
Catarata , Cristalino , Receptor EphA2 , Humanos , Ratones , Animales , Efrinas/genética , Efrinas/metabolismo , Receptor EphA1/metabolismo , Efrina-A5/genética , Efrina-A5/metabolismo , Ligandos , Receptor EphA2/genética , Receptor EphA2/metabolismo , Cristalino/metabolismo , Receptores de la Familia Eph/genética , Receptores de la Familia Eph/metabolismo , Catarata/genética , ARN Mensajero/metabolismoRESUMEN
The transparent ocular lens in the anterior chamber of the eye is responsible for fine focusing of light onto the retina. The lens is entirely cellular with bulk of the tissue composed of fiber cells, and the anterior hemisphere of the lens is covered by a monolayer of epithelial cells. Lens epithelial cells are important for maintaining fiber cell homeostasis and for continual growth of the lens tissue throughout life. Cataracts, defined as any opacity in the lens, remain the leading cause of blindness in the world. Following cataract surgery, lens epithelial cells can undergo a process of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), leading to secondary cataracts due to posterior capsular opacification (PCO). Since the epithelial cells make up only a small fraction of the lens, specialized techniques are required to study lens epithelial cell biology and pathology. Studies using native lens epithelial cells often require pooling of samples to obtain enough cells to make sufficient samples for traditional molecular biology techniques. Here, we provide detailed protocols that enable the study of native mouse lens epithelial cells, including immunostaining of the native lens epithelium in flat mounts, extraction of RNA and proteins from pairs of lens epithelial monolayers, and isolation of lens epithelial cells for primary culture. These protocols will enable researchers to gain better insight on representative molecular expression and cellular structure of lens epithelial cells. We also provide comparative data between native, primary culture, and immortalized lens epithelial cells and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each technique presented.