Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 173
Filtrar
1.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 103(5): 703-709, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38520176

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Full adoption of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) assessment faces challenges due to its invasive nature and concerns about prolonged procedure time and increased contrast and/or radiation exposure. We compared procedural aspects of CMD invasive assessment to diagnostic left heart catheterization (DLHC) in patients with chest pain who were not found to have obstructive coronary artery disease. METHODS: A total of 227 patients in the Coronary Microvascular Disease Registry were compared to 1592 patients who underwent DLHC from August 2021 to November 2023. The two cohorts were compared using propensity-score matching; primary outcomes were fluoroscopy time and total contrast use. RESULTS: The participants' mean age was 64.1 ± 12.6 years. CMD-assessed patients were more likely to be female (66.5% vs. 45.2%, p < 0.001) and have hypertension (80.2% vs. 44.5%, p < 0.001), history of stroke (11.9% vs. 6.3%, p = 0.002), and history of myocardial infarction (20.3% vs. 7.7%, p < 0.001). CMD assessment was safe, without any reported adverse outcomes. A propensity-matched analysis showed that patients who underwent CMD assessment had slightly higher median contrast exposure (50 vs. 40 mL, p < 0.001), and slightly longer fluoroscopy time (6.9 vs. 4.7 min, p < 0.001). However, there was no difference in radiation dose (209.3 vs. 219 mGy, p = 0.58) and overall procedure time (31 vs. 29 min, p = 0.37). CONCLUSION: Compared to DLHC, CMD assessment is safe and requires only slightly additional contrast use (10 mL) and slightly longer fluoroscopy time (2 min) without clinical implications. These findings emphasize the favorable safety and feasibility of invasive CMD assessment.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Angina Microvascular , Infarto del Miocardio , Isquemia Miocárdica , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Masculino , Resultado del Tratamiento , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Angina Microvascular/diagnóstico , Circulación Coronaria , Microcirculación , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen
2.
Clin Infect Dis ; 77(8): 1201-1208, 2023 10 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36988328

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: No human rabies post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) failure has been documented in the United States using modern cell culture-based vaccines. In January 2021, an 84-year-old male died from rabies 6 months after being bitten by a rabid bat despite receiving timely rabies PEP. We investigated the cause of breakthrough infection. METHODS: We reviewed medical records, laboratory results, and autopsy findings and performed whole-genome sequencing (WGS) to compare patient and bat virus sequences. Storage, administration, and integrity of PEP biologics administered to the patient were assessed; samples from leftover rabies immunoglobulin were evaluated for potency. We conducted risk assessments for persons potentially exposed to the bat and for close patient contacts. RESULTS: Rabies virus antibodies present in serum and cerebrospinal fluid were nonneutralizing. Antemortem blood testing revealed that the patient had unrecognized monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance. Autopsy findings showed rabies meningoencephalitis and metastatic prostatic adenocarcinoma. Rabies virus sequences from the patient and the offending bat were identical by WGS. No deviations were identified in potency, quality control, administration, or storage of administered PEP. Of 332 persons assessed for potential rabies exposure to the case patient, 3 (0.9%) warranted PEP. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first reported failure of rabies PEP in the Western Hemisphere using a cell culture-based vaccine. Host-mediated primary vaccine failure attributed to previously unrecognized impaired immunity is the most likely explanation for this breakthrough infection. Clinicians should consider measuring rabies neutralizing antibody titers after completion of PEP if there is any suspicion for immunocompromise.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas Antirrábicas , Rabia , Masculino , Humanos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Rabia/prevención & control , Minnesota , Profilaxis Posexposición/métodos , Anticuerpos Antivirales
3.
J Zoo Wildl Med ; 53(4): 797-800, 2023 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36640082

RESUMEN

Rabies has rarely been described in Xenarthra, and rabies vaccine response has not been documented. A southern tamandua (Tamandua tetradactyla) presented with nonspecific clinical signs and was euthanatized. Subsequently, immunohistochemistry and RT-PCR confirmed a rabies diagnosis. Following these tests, a group of eight captive tamanduas were vaccinated with a killed rabies vaccine, and titers were measured at the time of vaccination and 23 d later. One animal had day 0 titers suggestive of previous vaccination or exposure. All animals had detectable neutralizing rabies virus antibody titers after vaccination, but one animal failed to meet the World Organization for Animal Health's definition for adequate vaccination (≥0.5 IU/ml), and two other animals had low antibody titers (0.56 and 0.6 IU/ml). Rabies should be considered as a possible cause of illness in tamanduas, and rabies vaccination may be a useful preventative measure when anthropic interaction through medical care or ambassador roles is occurring.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas Antirrábicas , Virus de la Rabia , Rabia , Xenarthra , Animales , Rabia/diagnóstico , Rabia/epidemiología , Rabia/prevención & control , Rabia/veterinaria , Vermilingua , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes , Vacunación/veterinaria , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Virus de la Rabia/genética
4.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 28(6): 1137-1145, 2022 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35608558

RESUMEN

In the Western Hemisphere, bat-associated rabies viruses (RABVs) have established independent transmission cycles in multiple mammal hosts, forming genetically distinct lineages. In New Mexico, USA, skunks, bats, and gray foxes are rabies reservoir hosts and represent a public health risk because of encounters with humans. During 2015 and 2019, two previously undescribed RABVs were detected in 2 gray foxes (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) in Lincoln County, New Mexico. Phylogenetic analysis of the nucleoprotein gene indicated that the isolates are a novel RABV variant. These 2 cases probably represent repeated spillover events from an unknown bat reservoir to gray foxes. Molecular analysis of rabies cases across New Mexico identified that other cross-species transmission events were the result of viral variants previously known to be enzootic to New Mexico. Despite a robust rabies public health surveillance system in the United States, advances in testing and surveillance techniques continue to identify previously unrecognized zoonotic pathogens.


Asunto(s)
Quirópteros , Zorros , Virus de la Rabia , Rabia , Animales , Quirópteros/virología , Zorros/virología , México/epidemiología , New Mexico/epidemiología , Filogenia , Rabia/epidemiología , Rabia/veterinaria , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
5.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 71(18): 619-627, 2022 May 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35511716

RESUMEN

Human rabies is an acute, progressive encephalomyelitis that is nearly always fatal once symptoms begin. Several measures have been implemented to prevent human rabies in the United States, including vaccination of targeted domesticated and wild animals, avoidance of behaviors that might precipitate an exposure (e.g., provoking high-risk animals), awareness of the types of animal contact that require postexposure prophylaxis (PEP), and use of proper personal protective equipment when handling animals or laboratory specimens. PEP is widely available in the United States and highly effective if administered after an exposure occurs. A small subset of persons has a higher level of risk for being exposed to rabies virus than does the general U.S. population; these persons are recommended to receive preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP), a series of human rabies vaccine doses administered before an exposure occurs, in addition to PEP after an exposure. PrEP does not eliminate the need for PEP; however, it does simplify the rabies PEP schedule (i.e., eliminates the need for rabies immunoglobulin and decreases the number of vaccine doses required for PEP). As rabies epidemiology has evolved and vaccine safety and efficacy have improved, Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommendations to prevent human rabies have changed. During September 2019-November 2021, the ACIP Rabies Work Group considered updates to the 2008 ACIP recommendations by evaluating newly published data, reviewing frequently asked questions, and identifying barriers to adherence to previous ACIP rabies vaccination recommendations. Topics were presented and discussed during six ACIP meetings. The following modifications to PrEP are summarized in this report: 1) redefined risk categories; 2) fewer vaccine doses in the primary vaccination schedule; 3) flexible options for ensuring long-term protection, or immunogenicity; 4) less frequent or no antibody titer checks for some risk groups; 5) a new minimum rabies antibody titer (0.5 international units [IUs]) per mL); and 6) clinical guidance, including for ensuring effective vaccination of certain special populations.


Asunto(s)
Profilaxis Pre-Exposición , Vacunas Antirrábicas , Rabia , Comités Consultivos , Animales , Humanos , Inmunización , Esquemas de Inmunización , Inmunoglobulinas/uso terapéutico , Rabia/epidemiología , Rabia/prevención & control , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Vacunación
6.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 71(15): 533-537, 2022 Apr 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35421075

RESUMEN

On August 16, 2021, the Tennessee Department of Health (TDH) was notified of a positive rabies test result from a South American collared anteater (Tamandua tetradactyla) in Washington County, Tennessee. Tamanduas, or lesser anteaters, are a species of anteater in which rabies has not previously been reported. The animal was living at a Tennessee zoo and had been recently translocated from a zoo in Virginia. TDH conducted an investigation to confirm the rabies result, characterize the rabies variant, and ascertain an exposure risk assessment among persons who came into contact with the tamandua. Risk assessments for 22 persons were completed to determine the need for rabies postexposure prophylaxis (rPEP); rPEP was recommended for 13 persons, all of whom agreed to receive it. Using phylogenetic results of the virus isolated from the tamandua and knowledge of rabies epidemiology, public health officials determined that the animal was likely exposed to wild raccoons present at the Virginia zoo. This report describes expansion of the wide mammalian species diversity susceptible to rabies virus infection and summarizes the investigation, highlighting coordination among veterinary and human public health partners and the importance of preexposure rabies vaccination for animal handlers and exotic zoo animals.


Asunto(s)
Rabia , Vermilingua , Animales , Humanos , Filogenia , Rabia/epidemiología , Rabia/prevención & control , Rabia/veterinaria , Tennessee/epidemiología , Virginia/epidemiología
7.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 71(49): 1547-1549, 2022 Dec 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36480462

RESUMEN

In late August 2021, a boy aged 7 years was bitten by a bat while he was playing outside his apartment home in Medina County, Texas. He informed his parents; however, no rabies postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) was sought because there were no visible bite marks, and the family was unaware that contact with a bat, including in the absence of visible bite marks, might cause rabies. Approximately 2 months later, the child was hospitalized for altered mental status, seizures, and hypersalivation and ultimately received a diagnosis of rabies. Experimental therapies were attempted; however, the child died 22 days after symptom onset. Fifty-seven persons who met criteria for suspected or known exposure to infectious secretions in this case were advised to consult with a medical provider about the need for rabies PEP in accordance with Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) guidelines (1). Rabies, an acute, progressive neuroencephalitis, is nearly always fatal. Although dogs are the most common source of human rabies deaths worldwide and account for an estimated 59,000 annual cases of human rabies globally (2), bats are the most common source of domestically acquired rabies in the United States and have been implicated in 31 (81.6%) of 38 human infections since 2000 (3). Attempts to prevent death or poor neurologic outcomes once rabies symptoms develop have been largely unsuccessful (4). Administration of rabies PEP, comprising rabies immunoglobulin and a series of doses of rabies vaccine, is critical to preventing rabies after an exposure; enhanced public education about the risk posed by bats, and the availability of PEP to prevent rabies, is needed.


Asunto(s)
Padres , Niño , Humanos , Perros , Animales , Texas/epidemiología
8.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 71(20): 686-689, 2022 May 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35587914

RESUMEN

On June 16, 2021, rabies virus infection was confirmed in a dog included in a shipment of rescue animals imported into the United States from Azerbaijan. A multistate investigation was conducted to prevent secondary rabies cases, avoid reintroduction of a dog-maintained rabies virus variant (DMRVV), identify persons who might have been exposed and would be recommended to receive rabies postexposure prophylaxis, and investigate the cause of importation control failures. Results of a prospective serologic monitoring (PSM) protocol suggested that seven of 32 (22%) animals from the same shipment as the dog with confirmed rabies virus infection and who had available titer results after rabies vaccine booster had not been adequately vaccinated against rabies before importation. A requirement for rabies vaccination certificates alone will not adequately identify improper vaccination practices or fraudulent paperwork and are insufficient as a stand-alone rabies importation prevention measure. Serologic titers before importation would mitigate the risk for importing DMRVV.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Perros , Vacunas Antirrábicas , Virus de la Rabia , Rabia , Animales , Azerbaiyán , Enfermedades de los Perros/prevención & control , Perros , Humanos , Pennsylvania , Estudios Prospectivos , Rabia/epidemiología , Rabia/prevención & control , Rabia/veterinaria , Estados Unidos , Vacunación/veterinaria
9.
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J ; 22(1): 24-29, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34838748

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There are limited data describing the experience of radiofrequency (RF) vs. cryoballoon (CB) ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) among elderly patients in the United States. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients ≥75 years of age undergoing index RF vs. CB ablation between January 2014 and May 2020 at our center. The choice of ablation technique was left to the operator's discretion. Major complications and efficacy, defined as freedom from any atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) lasting ≥30 s after one year of follow-up, were assessed in patients with index RF vs. CB ablation. RESULTS: In our cohort of 186 patients, the median age was 78 (76-81) years, 54.8% were men, and 39.2% had persistent AF. The median CHA2DS2-VASc score was 4 (3-4), while the median duration of AF was 3 (1-7) years. The majority (n = 112, 60.2%) underwent RF ablation. The median procedure time was significantly lower in CB group (197 vs 226.5 min, p=<0.01). The incidence of complications was similar in the two sub-groups (RF: 1.8% vs. CB: 2.7%, p = 0.67). Similarly, arrhythmia-free survival rate on antiarrhythmic drugs at 1-year follow-up remained statistically comparable (63.4% vs. 68.9%, p = 0.33) between patients receiving RF vs. CB ablation. CONCLUSION: The safety and efficacy of RF vs. CB ablation for AF remained comparable in our cohort of patients older than 75 years. CB ablation was associated with a shorter procedure time.

10.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 32(12): 3125-3134, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34453377

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is variably performed before atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation to evaluate left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus. We describe our experience with transitioning to the pre-ablation cardiac computed tomography (CT) approach for the assessment of LAA thrombus during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We studied consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation at our center. The study cohort was divided into pre- versus post-COVID groups. The pre-COVID cohort included ablations performed during the 1 year before the COVID-19 pandemic; pre-ablation TEE was used routinely to evaluate LAA thrombus in high-risk patients. Post-COVID cohort included ablations performed during the 1 year after the COVID-19 pandemic; pre-ablation CT was performed in all patients, with TEE performed only in patients with LAA thrombus by CT imaging. The demographics, clinical history, imaging, and ablation characteristics, and peri-procedural cerebrovascular events (CVEs) were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 637 patients (pre-COVID n = 424, post-COVID n = 213) were studied. The mean age was 65.6 ± 10.1 years in the total cohort, and the majority were men. There was a significant increase in pre-ablation CT imaging from pre- to post-COVID cohort (74.8% vs. 93.9%, p ≤ .01), with a significant reduction in TEEs (34.6% vs. 3.7%, p ≤ .01). One patient in the post-COVID cohort developed CVE following negative pre-ablation CT. However, the incidence of peri-procedural CVE between both cohorts remained statistically unchanged (0% vs. 0.4%, p = .33). CONCLUSION: Implementation of pre-ablation CT-only imaging strategy with selective use of TEE for LAA thrombus evaluation is not associated with increased CVE risk during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Asunto(s)
Apéndice Atrial , Fibrilación Atrial , COVID-19 , Ablación por Catéter , Trombosis , Anciano , Apéndice Atrial/diagnóstico por imagen , Apéndice Atrial/cirugía , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico por imagen , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Ablación por Catéter/efectos adversos , Ecocardiografía Transesofágica , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Trombosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Trombosis/epidemiología , Tomografía
11.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 26(12): 1-9, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33219786

RESUMEN

Domestic dogs are responsible for nearly all the ¼59,000 global human rabies deaths that occur annually. Numerous control measures have been successful at eliminating dog-mediated human rabies deaths in upper-income countries, including dog population management, parenteral dog vaccination programs, access to human rabies vaccines, and education programs for bite prevention and wound treatment. Implementing these techniques in resource-poor settings can be challenging; perhaps the greatest challenge is maintaining adequate herd immunity in free-roaming dog populations. Oral rabies vaccines have been a cornerstone in rabies virus elimination from wildlife populations; however, oral vaccines have never been effectively used to control dog-mediated rabies. Here, we convey the perspectives of the World Organisation for Animal Health Rabies Reference Laboratory Directors, the World Organisation for Animal Health expert committee on dog rabies control, and World Health Organization regarding the role of oral vaccines for dogs. We also issue recommendations for overcoming hesitations to expedited field use of appropriate oral vaccines.


Asunto(s)
Mordeduras y Picaduras , Enfermedades de los Perros , Vacunas Antirrábicas , Virus de la Rabia , Rabia , Animales , Enfermedades de los Perros/prevención & control , Perros , Humanos , Rabia/prevención & control , Rabia/veterinaria , Virus de la Rabia/inmunología
12.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 26(7): 1399-1408, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32568051

RESUMEN

Using questionnaires and serologic testing, we evaluated bat and lyssavirus exposure among persons in an area of Nigeria that celebrates a bat festival. Bats from festival caves underwent serologic testing for phylogroup II lyssaviruses (Lagos bat virus, Shimoni bat virus, Mokola virus). The enrolled households consisted of 2,112 persons, among whom 213 (10%) were reported to have ever had bat contact (having touched a bat, having been bitten by a bat, or having been scratched by a bat) and 52 (2%) to have ever been bitten by a bat. Of 203 participants with bat contact, 3 (1%) had received rabies vaccination. No participant had neutralizing antibodies to phylogroup II lyssaviruses, but >50% of bats had neutralizing antibodies to these lyssaviruses. Even though we found no evidence of phylogroup II lyssavirus exposure among humans, persons interacting with bats in the area could benefit from practicing bat-related health precautions.


Asunto(s)
Mordeduras y Picaduras , Quirópteros , Lyssavirus , Infecciones por Rhabdoviridae , Animales , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes , Vacaciones y Feriados , Humanos , Lyssavirus/genética , Nigeria , Infecciones por Rhabdoviridae/epidemiología , Infecciones por Rhabdoviridae/veterinaria
13.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 69(29): 956-959, 2020 Jul 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32701943

RESUMEN

On November 7, 2018, the Utah Department of Health (UDOH) reported the first confirmed human rabies death in the state since 1944 (1). The case occurred in a person who had been treated over a period of 19 days at four health care facilities and an emergency medical transport service across three counties and two states. Human rabies is preventable through preexposure or postexposure vaccination but is invariably fatal upon symptom onset. Timely identification of persons who might have been exposed to rabies virus is therefore crucial to administer postexposure prophylaxis (PEP). Because of the large number of health care workers who had been involved in the patient's care, a standardized online risk assessment survey was developed by UDOH based on Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommendations (2). This online tool was evaluated for accuracy, acceptability, and administrative obligation by reviewing the results from the tool and conducting focus group discussions and a follow-up survey. Among 90 health care workers initially identified by the online risk assessment as being potentially exposed to infectious material, 74 were classified as exposed. All 74 health care workers received PEP following consultation with occupational health staff members, indicating a positive predictive value of the assessment tool of 82%. In a follow-up survey, 42 (76%) of the 55 respondents reported that they were satisfied with the assessment process. In focus group discussions, participants suggested that the survey could be improved by providing additional information about rabies exposures because many of them were unfamiliar with human-to-human rabies transmission. This evaluation highlighted the importance of adopting clear communication strategies, demonstrated the benefits of using an online risk assessment during a mass rabies exposure, and provided specific feedback for CDC to improve resources available for states and health care facilities after mass rabies exposures.


Asunto(s)
Personal de Salud , Internet , Exposición Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Rabia/prevención & control , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Humanos , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional/prevención & control , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Profilaxis Posexposición/estadística & datos numéricos , Rabia/epidemiología , Rabia/transmisión , Utah/epidemiología
14.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 69(38): 1374-1377, 2020 Sep 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32970659

RESUMEN

Although canine rabies virus variant (CRVV) was successfully eliminated from the United States after approximately 6 decades of vaccination campaigns, licensing requirements, and stray animal control, dogs remain the principal source of human rabies infections worldwide. A rabies vaccination certificate is required for dogs entering the United States from approximately 100 countries with endemic CRVV, including Egypt (1). On February 25, 2019, rabies was diagnosed in a dog imported from Egypt, representing the third canine rabies case imported from Egypt in 4 years (2,3). This dog and 25 others were imported by a pet rescue organization in the Kansas City metropolitan area on January 29. Upon entry into the United States, all 26 dogs had certificates of veterinary inspection, rabies vaccination certificates, and documentation of serologic conversion from a government-affiliated rabies laboratory in Egypt. CDC confirmed that the dog was infected with a CRVV that circulates in Egypt, underscoring the continued risk for CRVV reintroduction and concern regarding the legitimacy of vaccine documentation of dogs imported from countries considered at high risk for CRVV. Vaccination documentation of dogs imported from these countries should be critically evaluated before entry into the United States is permitted, and public health should be consulted upon suspicion of questionable documents.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Transmisibles Importadas/veterinaria , Enfermedades de los Perros/diagnóstico , Rabia/veterinaria , Animales , Enfermedades Transmisibles Importadas/diagnóstico , Perros , Egipto , Kansas , Rabia/diagnóstico
15.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 69(23): 710-713, 2020 Jun 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32525853

RESUMEN

On April 22, CDC and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) reported cases of two domestic cats with confirmed infection with SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). These are the first reported companion animals (including pets and service animals) with SARS-CoV-2 infection in the United States, and among the first findings of SARS-CoV-2 symptomatic companion animals reported worldwide. These feline cases originated from separate households and were epidemiologically linked to suspected or confirmed human COVID-19 cases in their respective households. Notification of presumptive positive animal test results triggered a One Health* investigation by state and federal partners, who determined that no further transmission events to other animals or persons had occurred. Both cats fully recovered. Although there is currently no evidence that animals play a substantial role in spreading COVID-19, CDC advises persons with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 to restrict contact with animals during their illness and to monitor any animals with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and separate them from other persons and animals at home (1).


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus/aislamiento & purificación , Enfermedades de los Gatos/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de los Gatos/virología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/veterinaria , Pandemias/veterinaria , Mascotas/virología , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Neumonía Viral/veterinaria , Animales , COVID-19 , Gatos , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , New York , Neumonía Viral/transmisión , SARS-CoV-2 , Zoonosis
16.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 69(5): 121-124, 2020 Feb 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32027626

RESUMEN

On November 3, 2018, the Utah Department of Health (UDOH) was notified of a suspected human rabies case in a man aged 55 years. The patient's symptoms had begun 18 days earlier, and he was hospitalized for 15 days before rabies was suspected. As his symptoms worsened, he received supportive care, but he died on November 4. On November 7, a diagnosis of rabies was confirmed by CDC. This was the first documented rabies death in a Utah resident since 1944. This report summarizes the patient's clinical course and the subsequent public health investigation, which determined that the patient had handled several bats in the weeks preceding symptom onset. Public health agencies, in partnership with affected health care facilities, identified and assessed the risk to potentially exposed persons, facilitated receipt of postexposure prophylaxis (PEP), and provided education to health care providers and the community about the risk for rabies associated with bats. Human rabies is rare and almost always fatal. The findings from this investigation highlight the importance of early recognition of rabies, improved public awareness of rabies in bats, and the use of innovative tools after mass rabies exposure events to ensure rapid and recommended risk assessment and provision of PEP.


Asunto(s)
Rabia/diagnóstico , Resultado Fatal , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Práctica de Salud Pública , Utah
17.
Biologicals ; 64: 83-95, 2020 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32089431

RESUMEN

Rabies is a major neglected zoonotic disease and causes a substantial burden in the Asian region. Currently, Pacific Oceania is free of rabies but enzootic areas throughout southeast Asia represent a major risk of disease introduction to this region. On September 25-26, 2019, researchers, government officials and related stakeholders met at an IABS conference in Bangkok, Thailand to engage on the topic of human rabies mediated by dogs. The objective of the meeting was focused upon snowballing efforts towards achieving substantial progress in rabies prevention, control and elimination within Asia by 2030, and thereby to safeguard the Pacific region. Individual sessions focused upon domestic animal, wildlife and human vaccination; the production and evaluation of quality, safety and efficacy of existing rabies biologics; and the future development of new products. Participants reviewed the progress to date in eliminating canine rabies by mass vaccination, described supportive methods to parenteral administration by oral vaccine application, considered updated global and local approaches at human prophylaxis and discussed the considerable challenges ahead. Such opportunities provide continuous engagement on disease management among professionals at a trans-disciplinary level and promote new applied research collaborations in a modern One Health context.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Perros , Vacunas Antirrábicas/uso terapéutico , Rabia , Zoonosis , Animales , Congresos como Asunto , Enfermedades de los Perros/epidemiología , Enfermedades de los Perros/prevención & control , Perros , Humanos , Rabia/epidemiología , Rabia/prevención & control , Tailandia , Zoonosis/epidemiología , Zoonosis/prevención & control
18.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 68(23): 524-528, 2019 Jun 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31194721

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Each year, rabies causes approximately 59,000 deaths worldwide, including approximately two deaths in the United States. Before 1960, dogs were a common reservoir of rabies in the United States; however, increasingly, species of wildlife (e.g., bats, raccoons) are the main reservoirs. This report characterizes human rabies deaths, summarizes trends in rabies mortality, and highlights current rabies risks in the United States. METHODS: Rabies trends in the United States during 1938-2018 were analyzed using national rabies surveillance data. Data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project for 2006-2014 were used to estimate the number of postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) visits per 100,000 persons during 2017-2018. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' average sales price data were used to estimate PEP costs. RESULTS: From 1960 to 2018, a total of 125 human rabies cases were reported in the United States; 36 (28%) were attributed to dog bites during international travel. Among the 89 infections acquired in the United States, 62 (70%) were attributed to bats. In 2018, approximately 55,000 persons sought PEP after contact with a potentially rabid animal. CONCLUSIONS AND COMMENTS: In the United States, wildlife rabies, especially in bats, continues to pose a risk to humans. Travelers also might be exposed to canine rabies in countries where the disease is still present; increased awareness of rabies while traveling abroad is needed. Vaccinating pets, avoiding contact with wildlife, and seeking medical care if one is bitten or scratched by an animal are the most effective ways to prevent rabies. Understanding the need for timely administration of PEP to prevent death is critical.


Asunto(s)
Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/estadística & datos numéricos , Vigilancia de la Población , Rabia/mortalidad , Animales , Mordeduras y Picaduras , Quirópteros/virología , Enfermedades de los Perros/virología , Perros , Humanos , Internacionalidad , Mortalidad/tendencias , Profilaxis Posexposición , Rabia/prevención & control , Rabia/transmisión , Rabia/veterinaria , Factores de Riesgo , Enfermedad Relacionada con los Viajes , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
19.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 67(5152): 1410-1414, 2019 Jan 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30605446

RESUMEN

On May 9, 2017, the Virginia Department of Health was notified regarding a patient with suspected rabies. The patient had sustained a dog bite 6 weeks before symptom onset while traveling in India. On May 11, CDC confirmed that the patient was infected with a rabies virus that circulates in dogs in India. Despite aggressive treatment, the patient died, becoming the ninth person exposed to rabies abroad who has died from rabies in the United States since 2008. A total of 250 health care workers were assessed for exposure to the patient, 72 (29%) of whom were advised to initiate postexposure prophylaxis (PEP). The total pharmaceutical cost for PEP (rabies immunoglobulin and rabies vaccine) was approximately $235,000. International travelers should consider a pretravel consultation with travel health specialists; rabies preexposure prophylaxis is warranted for travelers who will be in rabies endemic countries for long durations, in remote areas, or who plan activities that might put them at risk for a rabies exposures.


Asunto(s)
Virus de la Rabia/aislamiento & purificación , Rabia/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Relacionada con los Viajes , Anciano , Animales , Mordeduras y Picaduras , Trazado de Contacto , Enfermedades de los Perros/epidemiología , Enfermedades de los Perros/virología , Perros , Resultado Fatal , Femenino , Humanos , India/epidemiología , Profilaxis Posexposición/economía , Rabia/epidemiología , Rabia/prevención & control , Rabia/veterinaria , Virginia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda