RESUMEN
An efficient recycling process is developed to recover valuable materials from overhaul slag and reduce its harm to the ecological environment. The high temperature sulfuric acid roasting - water leaching technology is innovatively proposed to prepare Li2CO3 from overhaul slag. Under roasting conditions, fluorine volatilizes into the flue gas with HF, lithium is transformed into NaLi(SO4), aluminum is firstly transformed into NaAl(SO4)2, and then decomposed into Al2O3, so as to selective extraction of lithium. Under the optimal roasting - leaching conditions, the leaching rate of lithium and aluminum are 95.6% and 0.9%, respectively. Then the processes of impurity removal, and settling lithium are carried out. The Li2CO3 with recovery rate of 72.6% and purity of 98.6% could be obtained under the best settling lithium conditions. Compared with the traditional process, this work has short flow, high controllability, remarkable technical, economic, and environmental benefits. This comprehensive recycling technology is suitable for overhaul slag, and has great practical application potential for the disposal of other hazardous wastes in electrolytic aluminum industry.
Asunto(s)
Carbonato de Litio , Reciclaje , Ácidos Sulfúricos , Ácidos Sulfúricos/química , Reciclaje/métodos , Carbonato de Litio/química , Aluminio/química , Litio/química , Agua/químicaRESUMEN
Introduction: This study compared microbial compositions of midstream and catheter urine specimens from patients with suspected complicated urinary tract infections to determine if emerging and fastidious uropathogens are infecting the bladder or are contaminants. Methods: Urine was collected by in-and-out catheter (n = 1000) or midstream voiding (n = 1000) from 2000 adult patients (≥60 years of age) at 17 DispatchHealth sites across 11 states. The two groups were matched by age (mean 81 years), sex (62.1% female, 37.9% male), and ICD-10-CM codes. Microbial detection was performed with multiplex polymerase chain reaction (M-PCR) with a threshold for "positive detection" ≥ 10,000 cells/mL for bacteria or any detection for yeast. Results were divided by sex. Results: In females, 28 of 30 microorganisms/groups were found by both collection methods, while in males 26 of 30 were found by both. There were significant overlaps in the detection and densities of classical uropathogens including Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, and Klebsiella pneumoniae, as well as emerging uropathogens including Actinotignum schaalii and Aerococcus urinae. In females, detection rates were slightly higher in midstream voided compared to catheter-collected (p = 0.0005) urine samples, while males showed the opposite trend (p < 0.0001). More polymicrobial infections were detected in midstream voided compared to catheter-collected samples (64.4% vs 45.7%, p < 0.0001) in females but the opposite in males (35.6% vs 47.0%, p = 0.002). Discussion: In-and-out catheter-collected and midstream voided urine specimens shared significant similarities in microbial detections by M-PCR, with some differences found for a small subset of organisms and between sexes. Conclusion: Non-invasive midstream voided collection of urine specimens for microbial detection and identification in cases of presumed UTI does not result in significantly more contamination compared to in-and-out catheter-collected specimens. Additionally, organisms long regarded as contaminants should be reconsidered as potential uropathogens.