RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Previous observational studies have highlighted potential links between the consumption of processed meat and red meat (such as pork, mutton, and beef intake) and the occurrence of mental disorders. However, it is unclear whether a causal association exists. Therefore, we employed the Mendelian randomization (MR) study to investigate the causal effects of genetically predicted processed meat and red meat on mood disorders (MD), anxiety disorders (AD), and major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS: Genetic instruments for processed and red meat were selected from the Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) of the UK Biobank Study. Their associations with MD (42,746 cases 254,976), AD (35,385 cases and 254,976 controls), and MDD (38,225 cases and 299,886 controls) were obtained from the FinnGen Consortium. The inverse variance weighted (IVW) method was the primary method for two-sample MR analysis. Additionally, we employed complementary analysis to assess the robustness of our MR findings (eg, MR Egger and weighted median). We also conducted multiple sensitivity analyses to investigate horizontal pleiotropy and heterogeneity. Moreover, we performed a univariate and multivariable MR (MVMR) study to evaluate these associations. RESULTS: In our univariate MR analysis, we observed that genetically predicted beef intake was associated with a reduced risk of MD [odds ratio (OR) = 0.403, 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 0.246-0.659; PIVW = 4.428 × 10-5], AD (OR = 0.443, 95 % CI = 0.267-0.734; PIVW = 1.563 × 10-3), and MDD (OR = 0.373, 95 % CI = 0.216-0.643; PIVW = 3.878 × 10-4). After adjusting for processed meat, pork, and mutton intake in the MVMR analysis, the protective association of beef intake against MD and MDD remained. However, there was no substantial evidence indicating a significant causal relationship between processed meat, pork, and mutton intake and the occurrence of mental disorders. Furthermore, our sensitivity analysis revealed no significant evidence of horizontal pleiotropy. CONCLUSION: These findings support a causal relationship between genetically predicted beef intake and reducing the risk of MD and MDD.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Trastornos Mentales , Carne Roja , Bovinos , Animales , Humanos , Análisis de la Aleatorización Mendeliana , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/etiología , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/genética , Estudio de Asociación del Genoma Completo , Carne , Carne Roja/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Introduction: The purpose of this study is to examine the potential causal relationship between levels of circulating glycine and coronary artery disease (CAD) using a two-step Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. Methods: We analyzed data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) conducted on European and East Asian populations. To assess the causal effects of circulating glycine levels on the risk of CAD. We used the inverse-variance weighting (IVW), weighted median (WM), MR-Egger, and Mendelian Randomization Pleiotropy RESidual Sum and Outlier (MR-PRESSO) methods. Furthermore, we conducted mediation analysis to investigate the contribution of blood pressure and other cardiovascular disease-related traits. Results: The two-step Mendelian randomization analysis revealed that higher levels of glycine in the blood were associated with a reduced risk of CAD in Europeans [odds ratio ( OR)=0.84, 95% confidence interval ( CI): 0.72, -0.98; P=0.029] and East Asians: ( OR=0.76, 95% CI: 0.66, -0.89; P=3.57×10 -4). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of these findings. Additionally, our results suggest that about 6.06% of the observed causal effect is mediated through genetically predicted systolic blood pressure (SBP) in the European population. Discussion: Our results contribute to the current knowledge regarding the involvement of glycine in the progression of CAD, and provide valuable methodological insights for the prevention and treatment of this condition.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Observational studies have reported that COVID-19 is associated with alterations in retinal layer thickness, including changes in the ganglion cell inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL). However, the causal relationships remain unknown. Therefore, we assessed the direction and strength of the causal relationship between COVID-19 and GCIPL and RNFL thicknesses using a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) design. METHODS: Data were obtained from a large-scale COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative (Nsample = 6,512,887), GCIPL dataset (Ncase = 31,434), and RNFL dataset (Ncase = 31,434). The inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method is the primary approach used to estimate causal effects. MR Egger, weighted median, weighted mode, MR Egger (bootstrap), and penalized weighted median methods were applied. Sensitivity analyses were implemented with RadialMR, MRPRESSO, MR-Egger regression, Cochran's Q statistic, leave-one-out analysis, and the funnel plot. RESULTS: Forward MR analysis revealed that genetically identified COVID-19 susceptibility significantly increased the risk of GCIPL thickness (OR = 2.428, 95 % confidence interval [CI]:1.493-3.947, PIVW = 3.579 × 10-4) and RNFL thickness (OR = 1.735, 95 % CI:1.198-2.513, PIVW = 3.580 × 10-3) after Bonferroni correction. Reverse MR analysis did not indicate a significant causal association between GCIPL and RNFL thicknesses and COVID-19 phenotypes. No significant horizontal pleiotropy was found in the sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The host genetic liability to COVID-19 susceptibility was causally associated with increased GCIPL and RNFL thicknesses. Documenting this association increases our understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying COVID -19 susceptibility in retinopathy.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Análisis de la Aleatorización Mendeliana , Humanos , Retina/patología , Retina/diagnóstico por imagen , Células Ganglionares de la Retina/patología , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Fibras Nerviosas/patología , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido SimpleRESUMEN
The coupling of mechanical deformation and electrical stimuli at the nanoscale has been the subject of intense investigation in the realm of materials science. Recently, twisted van der Waals (vdW) materials have emerged as a platform for exploring exotic quantum states. These states are intimately tied to the formation of moiré superlattices, which can be visualized by directly exploiting the electromechanical response. However, the origin of the response, even in twisted bilayer graphene (tBLG), remains unsettled. Here, employing lateral piezoresponse force microscopy (LPFM), we investigate the electromechanical responses of marginally twisted graphene moiré superlattices with different layer thicknesses. We observe distinct LPFM amplitudes and spatial profiles in tBLG and twisted monolayer-bilayer graphene (tMBG), exhibiting effective in-plane piezoelectric coefficients of 0.05 and 0.35 pm/V, respectively. Force tuning experiments further underscored a marked divergence in their responses. The contrasting behaviors suggest different electromechanical couplings in tBLG and tMBG. In tBLG, the response near the domain walls is attributed to the flexoelectric effect, while in tMBG, the behaviors can be comprehended within the context of the piezoelectric effect. Our results not only provide insights into electromechanical and corporative effects in twisted vdW materials with different stacking symmetries but may also offer a way to engineer them at the nanoscale.