Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 57(2): 257-64, 2007 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17188780

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Seborrheic dermatitis is commonly treated with anti-inflammatory products, including topical corticosteroids. Pimecrolimus cream 1% also exerts anti-inflammatory activity by inhibiting T-cell cytokine production. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the efficacy and safety of twice-daily pimecrolimus for treatment of moderate to severe facial seborrheic dermatitis. METHODS: This double-blind, vehicle-controlled, 4-week trial randomized patients with seborrheic dermatitis to pimecrolimus or vehicle (1:1). Clinical assessments (erythema [0-3] and scaling [0-3] combined for a total area score [0-6]) were performed at weeks 0, 2, and 4. Inclusion criteria included total area score 4 or greater and erythema 2 or greater. The prespecified primary variable, change from baseline in total area score at week 4, was analyzed using a two-sample t test for intent-to-treat and per protocol populations. RESULTS: In all, 96 adults of mean age 59.6 years, 88.5% male, were randomized (n = 47 pimecrolimus; 49 vehicle). At week 4, the mean change from baseline in total area score was 3.7 versus 3.3 for pimecrolimus and vehicle groups, respectively (intent-to-treat: P = .1913; 95% confidence interval (CI) for difference [-0.195, 0.961]). Per protocol analysis (n = 41 pimecrolimus; 46 vehicle) indicated a significant difference between groups (mean change 3.9 pimecrolimus vs 3.2 vehicle; P = .0156; CI [0.129, 1.197]). The superiority of pimecrolimus was observed as early as week 2 (intent-to-treat: P = .0062; CI [0.132, 0.777]; per protocol: P = .0012; CI [0.410, 1.593]). No drug-related serious adverse events occurred. The most frequent drug-related adverse events were local, mild, and transient (pimecrolimus = 26%; vehicle = 12%). LIMITATIONS: Generalizability is limited by the elderly male study population. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that pimecrolimus cream 1% is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for moderate to severe facial seborrheic dermatitis.


Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Dermatitis Seborreica/tratamiento farmacológico , Dermatosis Facial/tratamiento farmacológico , Tacrolimus/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Seborreica/patología , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Erupciones por Medicamentos/etiología , Dermatosis Facial/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Tacrolimus/administración & dosificación , Tacrolimus/efectos adversos , Tacrolimus/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 56(5): 739-47, 2007 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17258839

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Presenting signs/symptoms of skin cancer may aid in earlier detection and diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare prospectively collected, presenting signs/symptoms of malignant melanoma (MM), basal cell carcinoma (BCC), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and seborrheic keratosis (SK). METHODS: This analysis was part of a larger study on teledermatology involving 3039 skin neoplasms in 2152 patients at a Department of Veterans Affairs medical center. At presentation, participants were asked about signs/symptoms of specific skin lesions. In all, 912 biopsy-proven MM (39), BCC (411), SCC (238), and SK (224) were included in this analysis. Pearson chi(2) analyses were used to test associations of lesion type and specific signs/symptoms in pairwise comparisons. RESULTS: "No symptoms" was reported more often with MM (82%) as compared with BCC (relative risk [RR] 2.26, confidence interval [CI] 1.86, 2.75), SCC (RR 3.31, CI 2.54, 4.32), or SK (RR 2.0, CI 1.61, 2.48; all P < .0001). Tenderness was more commonly reported with SCC (40%) as compared with MM (RR 15.9, CI 2.28, 110.69), SK (RR 3.0, CI 2.11, 4.39), or BCC (RR 2.6, CI 1.97, 3.38; all P < .0001). Bleeding was more commonly reported with BCC (37%) as compared with SK (RR 2.3, CI 1.67, 3.20), SCC (RR 1.6, CI 1.22, 2.05), or MM (RR 29.8, CI 1.89, 469.65; all P

Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Basocelular/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico , Queratosis Seborreica/diagnóstico , Melanoma/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de la Piel/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biopsia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/diagnóstico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda