RESUMEN
The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of increased physical activity and cessation of smoking on the natural history of early peripheral arterial disease. We conducted a randomised controlled trial in Perth, Western Australia, involving 882 men with early peripheral arterial disease identified via population-based screening using the Edinburgh Claudication Questionnaire and the ankle:brachial index. Members of the control group (n = 441) received "usual care" from their general practitioner while members of the intervention group (n = 441) were allocated to a "stop smoking and keep walking" regime - a combined community-based intervention of cessation of smoking (where applicable) and increased physical activity. Postal follow-up occurred at two and 12 months post-entry into the trial. The main outcome of interest was maximum walking distance. There were no statistically significant differences in the characteristics of the "intervention" and "usual care" groups at recruitment. Follow-up information at two and 12 months was available for 85% and 84% of participants, respectively. At 12 months, more men allocated to the intervention group had improved their maximum walking distance (23% vs 15%; chi2 = 9.74, df = 2, p = 0.008). In addition, more men in the intervention group reported walking more than three times per week for recreation (34% vs 25%, p = 0.01). Although not statistically significant, more men in the intervention group who were smokers when enrolled in the trial had stopped smoking (12% vs 8%, p = 0.43). It is concluded that referral of older patients with intermittent claudication to established physiotherapy programs in the community can increase levels of physical activity and reduce disability related to peripheral arterial disease. A combination of simple and safe interventions that are readily available in the community through physiotherapists and general practitioners has the potential to improve early peripheral arterial disease.
Asunto(s)
Arteriopatías Oclusivas/terapia , Enfermedades Vasculares Periféricas/terapia , Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Caminata , Actividades Cotidianas , Anciano , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/prevención & control , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/rehabilitación , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Claudicación Intermitente/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Vasculares Periféricas/complicaciones , Enfermedades Vasculares Periféricas/prevención & control , Enfermedades Vasculares Periféricas/rehabilitación , Calidad de Vida , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Australia OccidentalRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with COPD has been shown to be beneficial but the optimal setting is not known. In the present study, the efficacy of a short-term community-based exercise programme was compared with a standard hospital outpatient programme. Additionally, the usefulness of community or home programmes in maintaining improvements in the longer term was studied. METHODOLOGY: Forty-three patients with moderate to severe COPD were randomized to one of the following three groups: a 3-month hospital programme then a 9 month home programme (Hospital/Home); a 3-month hospital programme then a 9-month community programme (Hospital/Community); or a 12-month community programme (Community/Community). The initial 3-month programme was analysed by comparing the Hospital group (Hospital/Home plus Hospital/Community) with the Community group (Community/Community). Six-minute walking distance (6MWD), quality of life (Guyatt chronic respiratory disease questionnaire, CRQ) and lung function were measured at 0, 3, 6 and 12 months and results were analysed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. RESULTS: At 3 months, there was a significant improvement from baseline in 6MWD in the Hospital group (81.3 +/- 18.3 m, P < 0.05, anova) but not the Community group (14.4 +/- 28.5 m, not significant). The difference between the groups was not significant (P = 0.058). At 3 months, there was a significant improvement in quality of life in the Hospital group (CRQ +16.3 +/- 3.1, P < 0.01, anova) and in the Community group (CRQ +10.2 +/- 4.9, P < 0.05, anova) but the difference between the groups was not significant. Following the initial 3-month programme, the dropout rate was high overall (73% by 12 months), and therefore data from the maintenance programme could not be analysed. CONCLUSIONS: A 3-month community-based exercise programme for patients with COPD did not improve 6MWD. The long-term retention rates in the programmes were poor.