Catheter-Directed Pharmacologic Thrombolysis for Acute Submassive and Massive Pulmonary Emboli in Children and Adolescents-An Exploratory Report.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to report a single-center experience of the safety and efficacy of pulmonary artery catheter-directed thrombolysis for both massive and submassive pulmonary emboli in the pediatric and adolescent population. DESIGN: A 22-month retrospective review of the electronic medical record and picture archiving and communication system was performed of patients less than 21 years old, presenting with massive or submassive pulmonary emboli treated with pulmonary artery catheter-directed thrombolysis at a single, tertiary care pediatric hospital. Multiple variables were analyzed including indications, technical success, clinical efficacy, and complications. SETTING: A single, tertiary care pediatric hospital. PATIENTS: Nine patients (mean 13.9 yr; range 6-19 yr) with massive and/or submassive pulmonary emboli who underwent pulmonary artery catheter-directed thrombolysis met inclusion criteria. INTERVENTIONS: Catheter-directed thrombolysis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Pulmonary emboli was diagnosed by CT angiography in all cases. Catheter-directed thrombolysis alone was clinically successful (defined as improved cardiopulmonary function following catheter-directed thrombolysis) in seven patients (78%) with two patients not improving following catheter-directed thrombolysis. There were no immediate bleeding complications from catheter-directed thrombolysis therapy. All patients were maintained on anticoagulation treatment following catheter-directed thrombolysis. Catheter-directed thrombolysis was technically successful (defined as successful placement of pulmonary artery infusion catheters with full or partial resolution of thrombus) in all cases. Follow-up pulmonary angiography at the cessation of catheter-directed thrombolysis revealed complete thrombus resolution in four patients (44%) and partial resolution in five patients (55%). Mean pulmonary artery pressures decreased in all patients (mean precatheter-directed thrombolysis pulmonary artery pressure = 37 ± 11 mm Hg; mean postcatheter-directed thrombolysis pulmonary artery pressure = 28 ± 10 mm Hg; p = 0.0164). CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary artery catheter-directed thrombolysis is a technically feasible therapeutic option for children and adolescents with submassive and massive pulmonary emboli.

Outcomes following implementation of a pediatric procedural sedation guide for referral to general anesthesia for magnetic resonance imaging studies.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Guidelines for referral of children to general anesthesia (GA) to complete MRI studies are lacking. We devised a pediatric procedural sedation guide to determine whether a pediatric procedural sedation guide would decrease serious adverse events and decrease failed sedations requiring rescheduling with GA. METHODS: We constructed a consensus-based sedation guide by combining a retrospective review of reasons for referral of children to GA (n = 221) with published risk factors associated with the inability to complete the MRI study with sedation. An interrupted time series analysis of 11 530 local sedation records from the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium between July 2008 and March 2013, adjusted for case-mix differences in the pre- and postsedation guide cohorts, evaluated whether a sedation guide resulted in decreased severe adverse events (SAE) and failed sedation rates. RESULTS: A significant increase in referrals to GA following implementation of a sedation guide occurred (P < 0.001), and fewer children with an ASA-PS class ≥III were sedated using procedural sedation (P < 0.001). There was no decrease in SAE (P = 0.874) or in SAE plus airway obstruction with concurrent hypoxia (P = 0.435). There was no change in the percentage of failed sedations (P = 0.169). CONCLUSIONS: More studies are needed to determine the impact of a sedation guide on pediatric procedural sedation services.

Moving anesthesiology educational resources to the point of care: experience with a pediatric anesthesia mobile app.

BACKGROUND: Educators in all disciplines recognize the need to update tools for the modern learner. Mobile applications (apps) may be useful, but real-time data is needed to demonstrate the patterns of utilization and engagement amongst learners. METHODS: We examined the use of an anesthesia app by two groups of learners (residents and anesthesiologist assistant students [AAs]) during a pediatric anesthesiology rotation. The app calculates age and weight-based information for clinical decision support and contains didactic materials for self-directed learning. The app transmitted detailed usage information to our research team. RESULTS: Over a 12-month period, 39 participants consented; 30 completed primary study procedures (18 residents, 12 AAs). AAs used the app more frequently than residents (P = 0.025) but spent less time in the app (P < 0.001). The median duration of app usage was 2.3 minutes. During the course of the rotation, usage of the app decreased over time. 'Succinylcholine' was the most accessed drug, while 'orientation' was the most accessed teaching module. Ten (33%) believed that the use of apps was perceived to be distracting by operating room staff and surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: Real-time in-app analytics helped elucidate the actual usage of this educational resource and will guide future decisions regarding development and educational content. Further research is required to determine learners' preferred choice of device, user experience, and content in the full range of clinical and nonclinical purposes.