Crizotinib in ROS1-rearranged advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): updated results, including overall survival, from PROFILE 1001.

BACKGROUND: In the ongoing phase I PROFILE 1001 study, crizotinib showed antitumor activity in patients with ROS1-rearranged advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we present updated antitumor activity, overall survival (OS) and safety data (additional 46.2 months follow-up) for patients with ROS1-rearranged advanced NSCLC from PROFILE 1001. PATIENTS AND METHODS: ROS1 status was determined by FISH or reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. All patients received crizotinib at a starting dose of 250 mg twice daily. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients received crizotinib, with a median duration of treatment of 22.4 months. At data cut-off, treatment was ongoing in 12 patients (23%). The objective response rate (ORR) was 72% [95% confidence interval (CI), 58% to 83%], including six confirmed complete responses and 32 confirmed partial responses; 10 patients had stable disease. Responses were durable (median duration of response 24.7 months; 95% CI, 15.2-45.3). ORRs were consistent across different patient subgroups. Median progression-free survival was 19.3 months (95% CI, 15.2-39.1). A total of 26 deaths (49%) occurred (median follow-up period of 62.6 months), and of the remaining 27 patients (51%), 14 (26%) were in follow-up at data cut-off. Median OS was 51.4 months (95% CI, 29.3 to not reached) and survival probabilities at 12, 24, 36, and 48 months were 79%, 67%, 53%, and 51%, respectively. No correlation was observed between OS and specific ROS1 fusion partner. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were mainly grade 1 or 2, per CTCAE v3.0. There were no grade ≥4 TRAEs and no TRAEs associated with permanent discontinuation. No new safety signals were reported with long-term crizotinib treatment. CONCLUSIONS: These findings serve as a new benchmark for OS in ROS1-rearranged advanced NSCLC, and continue to show the clinically meaningful benefit and safety of crizotinib in this molecular subgroup. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00585195.

Correlation of extent of ALK FISH positivity and crizotinib efficacy in three prospective studies of ALK-positive patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

Background: In clinical trials of patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with crizotinib, evaluation of the relationship between the percentage of ALK-positive cells by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)-particularly near the cut-off defining positive status-and clinical outcomes have been limited by small sample sizes. Patients and methods: Data were pooled from three large prospective trials (one single-arm and two randomized versus chemotherapy) of crizotinib in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC determined by Vysis ALK Break Apart FISH using a cut-off of ≥15% ALK-positive cells. Logistic regression and proportional hazards regression analyses were used to explore the association of percent ALK-positive cells with objective response and progression-free survival (PFS), respectively. Results: Of 11 081 screened patients, 1958 (18%) were ALK positive, 7512 (68%) were ALK negative, and 1540 (14%) were uninformative. Median percentage of ALK-positive cells was 58% in ALK-positive patients and 2% in ALK-negative patients. Of ALK-positive patients, 5% had 15%-19% ALK-positive cells; of ALK-negative patients, 2% had 10%-14% ALK-positive cells. Objective response rate for ALK-positive, crizotinib-treated patients with ≥20% ALK-positive cells was 56% (n = 700/1246), 55% (n = 725/1312) for those with ≥15% ALK-positive cells, and 38% for those with 15%-19% ALK-positive cells (n = 25/66). As a continuous variable, higher percentages of ALK-positive cells were estimated to be associated with larger differences in objective response and PFS between crizotinib and chemotherapy; however, tests for interaction between treatment and percentage of ALK-positive cells were not significant (objective response, P = 0.054; PFS, P = 0.17). Conclusions: Patients with ALK-positive NSCLC benefit from treatment with crizotinib across the full range of percentage of ALK-positive cells, supporting the clinical utility of the 15% cut-off. The small number of patients with scores near the cut-off warrant additional study given the potential for misclassification of ALK status due to technical or biologic reasons.

Phase I study of PD 0332991, a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, administered in 3-week cycles (Schedule 2/1).

BACKGROUND: This phase I, open-label, first-in-human study determined dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of PD 0332991, an oral cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor with potent anti-proliferative activity in vitro/vivo. METHODS: A total of 33 patients with retinoblastoma protein-positive advanced solid tumours or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma refractory to standard therapy or for which no therapy was available received PD 0332991 once daily (QD) for 14 days followed by 7 days off treatment (21-day cycles; Schedule 2/1). RESULTS: Six patients had DLTs (18%; four receiving 200 mg QD; two receiving 225 mg QD); the MTD was 200 mg QD. Treatment-related, non-haematological adverse events occurred in 29 patients (88%) during cycle 1 and 27 patients (82%) thereafter. Adverse events were generally mild-moderate. Of 31 evaluable patients, one with testicular cancer achieved a partial response; nine had stable disease (≥10 cycles in three cases). PD 0332991 was slowly absorbed (mean T(max) 4.2 h) and eliminated (mean half-life 26.7 h). Volume of distribution was large (mean 3241 l) with dose-proportional exposure. Using a maximum effective concentration model, neutropenia was proportional to exposure. CONCLUSION: PD 0332991 was generally well tolerated, with DLTs related mainly to myelosuppression. The MTD, 200 mg QD, is recommended for phase II study.

Pharmacokinetics of sertraline and its N-demethyl metabolite in elderly and young male and female volunteers.

A nonblinded study was conducted to compare the pharmacokinetic properties of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor sertraline in 22 young (aged 18 to 45 years) and 22 elderly (> 65 years) volunteers, of whom half were male and half were female. In this study, sertraline was administered at a dosage of 200mg once daily (the maximum recommended daily dosage) for 21 days after upward dosage titration from 50 mg/day over a 9-day period. Thus, this study was designed to measure the effect of age and gender on the pharmacokinetic properties of sertraline at the maximum dosage recommended for clinical use. The terminal elimination half-life (t1/2 beta ) of sertraline was similar in young females, elderly males and elderly females (mean t1/2 beta ranged from 32.1 to 36.7 hours in these groups) but shorter (22.4 hours) in the young males. The mean maximum plasma sertraline concentration (Cmax) and the mean steady-state area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 24 hours postdose (AUC24) were also similar between the young females, elderly males and elderly females, but were approximately 25% lower in the young males. The time to Cmax was unaffected by age or gender and ranged from 6.4 to 6.9 hours. N-Demethylsertraline is the principal metabolite of sertraline and does not contribute significantly to its serotonergic actions. The mean values for N-demethylsertraline trough plasma concentrations, AUC24 and Cmax were comparable in elderly males and females and young females but lower in young males. The ratios of mean AUC24 and Cmax for N-demethylsertraline to the AUC24 and Cmax for sertraline were similar between the 4 groups.

A study of the potential effect of sertraline on the pharmacokinetics and protein binding of tolbutamide.

The effect of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) sertraline 200 mg/day on the metabolism of intravenously administered tolbutamide was examined in a randomised nonblinded parallel-group study in 25 healthy male volunteers. There was a small but statistically significant decrease (16%) in the clearance of tolbutamide in patients receiving the maximum recommended dosage of sertraline. The terminal elimination rate constant was also significantly reduced, corresponding to the increase in the terminal elimination half-life (from 6.9 to 8.6 hours). The decrease in clearance was not associated with any significant changes in plasma protein binding or in the apparent volume of distribution of tolbutamide. This suggests that the change in tolbutamide clearance may be due to a slight inhibition of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzyme CYP2C9/10 when sertraline was administered in its maximum recommended dosage. However, the small changes in the volume of distribution and plasma binding of tolbutamide after sertraline treatment indicate that there is a minimal interaction between sertraline and tolbutamide.

Effect of sertraline on protein binding of warfarin.

The effect of sertraline on the plasma protein binding of warfarin was investigated in a nonblinded randomised placebo-controlled parallel trial in 12 healthy male volunteers. The study participants received single doses of warfarin before administration of sertraline or placebo and again after sertraline or placebo had been administered for 22 days. Treatment with sertraline for 26 days increased the area under the mean prothrombin time vs time curve by 145 sec *h (7.9%), compared with a decrease of 17 sec *h (-1.0%) in the placebo group. Although statistically significant (p = 0.02), this difference was not felt to be clinically meaningful. There appeared to be a slight delay in the normalisation of the prothrombin time in the sertraline-treated group after the second dose of warfarin, which also would not be expected to be clinically significant. After 22 days, a statistically significant (p = 0.02) increase in unbound warfarin was observed in the sertraline group compared with the placebo-treated individuals. Neither the change in prothrombin time nor the change in plasma protein binding were considered to have any clinical relevance; however, good clinical practice dictates that prothrombin time should be monitored in patients treated concurrently with warfarin and sertraline to ensure that the integrity of coagulation response is maintained. The metabolism of warfarin is principally mediated by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzyme CYP2C9/10. Thus, sertraline appears to have a minimal effect on the CYP2C9/10 isoenzyme.

Sertraline. Chronopharmacokinetics and the effect of coadministration with food.

Two nonblinded single-dose randomised 3-way crossover studies were conducted in healthy male volunteers to determine the effect of the time of administration (morning vs evening) and the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of sertraline tablets. There were no significant treatment effects on the mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), mean peak plasma sertraline concentration (Cmax), mean time to reach Cmax (tmax), mean terminal elimination half-life, or the mean elimination rate constant in either study. The results of these 2 studies show that the bioavailability and elimination of sertraline tablets are not influenced by the time of administration or administration with or without food. Thus, sertraline tablets offer the flexibility of morning or evening administration, to patients in the fasting or nonfasting state.

Effect of sertraline on the pharmacokinetics and protein binding of diazepam in healthy volunteers.

A double-blind randomised placebo-controlled study was conducted in healthy male volunteers to determine the effects of sertraline on the pharmacokinetics of diazepam and its primary metabolite, N-demethyldiazepam. The effect of sertraline on the plasma protein binding of diazepam was also studied. Sertraline 50 mg/day titrated over a 10-day period to 200 mg/day or placebo was administered for 32 days. A single intravenous dose of diazepam 10 mg was given before the start, and after 21 days of sertraline or placebo treatment. The pharmacokinetic analyses were based on data from 20 individuals. The systemic clearance of diazepam decreased by 32% (-0.100 ml/min/kg) in the sertraline group compared with a 19% decrease (-0.054 ml/min/kg) in the placebo group (p = 0.0266). However, this small difference (13%) between the 2 groups was not considered meaningful. Other than a prolonged time to maximum plasma concentration for N-demethyldiazepam, no other pharmacokinetic parameters were significantly altered by sertraline. The plasma protein binding of diazepam was unchanged by concomitant administration of sertraline. These results suggest that sertraline at the maximum recommended dosage under steady-state conditions, and demethylsertraline, the principal metabolite of sertraline, are unlikely to exert significant inhibitory effects on the CYP2C19 and CYP3A3/4 hepatic isoenzymes responsible for the metabolism of diazepam. Therefore, it would be expected that sertraline would, similarly, have a minimal effect on the pharmacokinetic profile of other drugs metabolised by these hepatic isoenzymes.

Effects of alpha 1 inhibition on renal blood flow and sympathetic nervous activity in systemic hypertension.

Doxazosin is a competitive inhibitor of norepinephrine at alpha 1 adrenoceptors on vascular smooth muscle, where it blocks vasoconstriction. Twenty-four patients with mild hypertension were treated with either doxazosin or placebo for 6 weeks. Supine and upright mean arterial pressures decreased by 9 and 12 mm Hg, respectively, in patients receiving doxazosin. This decrease was significantly more than the blood pressure change with placebo (p less than 0.05). Doxazosin therapy led to a small increase in weight (p less than 0.05). It was also associated with a statistically insignificant decrease in renal vascular resistance (568 dynes s/cm5) so that renal blood flow and creatinine clearance did not change. Doxazosin increased renin levels acutely and norepinephrine levels with 6-week treatment, but these changes were not significantly different from placebo. Norepinephrine clearance, measured after a 120-minute infusion of 3H norepinephrine, did not change. Heart rate increased acutely after doxazosin administration, but returned to baseline during 6-week therapy. Blood pressure, measured hourly for 14 hours after treatment, was consistently decreased in all patients. Doxazosin taken once daily lowers blood pressure without affecting renal blood flow or heart rate.

Sertraline does not alter the beta-adrenergic blocking activity of atenolol in healthy male volunteers.

UNLABELLED: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, crossover study was conducted to determine the effect of sertraline on the beta-adrenergic blocking activity of atenolol in 10 healthy male volunteers. METHOD: To assess the existence of any possible pharmacodynamic interaction between sertraline and atenolol, the effect of sertraline and placebo on the dose of intravenous isoproterenol required to increase heart rate by 25 beats per minute (bpm; chronotropic dose25 [CD25]) and the change in heart rate during exercise in atenolol-treated subjects were determined. RESULTS: The mean CD25 of isoproterenol was 2.00 micrograms after administration of placebo plus atenolol 50 mg and 2.03 micrograms after administration of sertralnie 100 micrograms plus atenolol 50 mg. The mean heart rate during exercise testing decreased by 29 bpm after sertraline plus atenolol administration and by 31 bpm after placebo plus atenolol administration. Analysis of variance indicated no statistically significant treatment or sequence effects. Only 1 subject experienced an adverse event--a mild headache after administration of sertraline plus atenolol. No clinically significant electrocardiograph changes were observed after sertraline or placebo administration. CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrate that sertraline does not alter the beta-blocking activity of atenolol.

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of CP-101,606 in patients with a mild or moderate traumatic brain injury.

CP-101,606 is a postsynaptic antagonist of the glutamate-mediated NR2B subunit of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor. When administered intravenously (i.v.) at the time of injury, CP-101,606 is neuroprotective in animal models of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and ischemia. Minimal adverse effects have been observed in normal human volunteers given i.v. doses of up to 3 mg/kg/hr for 72 hours. The objective of the present clinical trial was to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics, and tolerability of CP-101,606 infused for various times in patients who had suffered either an acute moderate or mild TBI (Glasgow Coma Score 9-14) or hemorrhagic stroke. Patients began receiving treatment within 12 hours of brain injury. A total of 53 subjects (45 with TBI and 8 with stroke) were randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive CP-101,606 or placebo (4 drug: 1 placebo). Drug/placebo was administered by i.v. infusion (0.75 mg/kg/hr) for 2 hours and then stopped (n = 25) or continued for 22 hours (n = 4) or 70 hours (n = 24) at a rate of 0.37 mg/kg/hr. Mean plasma drug concentrations were well above the predicted therapeutic concentration of 200 ng/ml within two hours of initiating treatment and were sustained as long as drug was infused. All the patients tolerated their drug/placebo treatment, and there were no clinically significant cardiovascular or hematological abnormalities in either group. A Neurobehavioral Rating Scale, used to detect personality changes and behavioral disturbances, indicated that all subjects showed an improvement from their postinjury, predosing baseline but did not significantly differ from each other with respect to type of head injury and/or treatment with drug or placebo. Modified Kurtzke Scoring also showed a similar pattern of improvement irrespective of type of head injury or drug/placebo treatment. This study suggests that CP-101,606, infused for up to 72 hours has no psychotropic effects and is well-tolerated in patients who have sustained a mild or moderate TBI or hemorrhagic stroke.

An open-label study of CP-101,606 in subjects with a severe traumatic head injury or spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.

CP-101,606 is a postsynaptic antagonist of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors bearing the NR2B subunit. When administered intravenously (i.v.), it decreases the effects of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and focal ischemia in animal models. Therapeutic plasma concentrations (200 ng/ml) in animals, have been well tolerated in healthy human volunteers. The purpose of the present dose escalation study was to assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of CP-101,606 in subjects who had suffered either an acute severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale 3-8) or spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Thirty patients, 20 with a TBI and 10 with a stroke, were enrolled in the trial and began receiving an i.v. infusion of CP-101,606 for 2 hours, 24 hours, or 72 hours within 12 hours of brain injury. For the first two hours, the drug was given a rate of 0.75 mg/kg/hr and then stopped (n = 17) or continued for 22 (n = 2) or 70 hours (n = 11) at 0.37 mg/kg/hr. Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were collected at serial times during and after treatment. There were no consistent changes in blood pressure or pulse nor any clinically significant hematological or electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities attributable to CP-101,606. No adverse events or behavioral changes were considered to be related to the drug. Plasma concentrations of CP-101,606 over 200 ng/ml were rapidly achieved in the blood and CSF within two hours and were sustained there as long as the drug was infused. CSF concentrations were slightly higher than that in plasma by the end of infusion suggesting good penetration of CP-101,606 into the CSF. Outcome in the severe TBI patients, as measured by the Glasgow Outcome Score at six months, suggested that a two-hour infusion yielded a range of scores similar to contemporary patients with a severe TBI treated at our hospital while the outcomes of the patients treated with either a 24- or 72-hour infusion were better on average. Thus, these results indicate that CP-101,606 infused for up to 72 hours is well tolerated, penetrates the CSF and brain, and may improve outcome in the brain-injured patient.

Effect of the anti-inflammatory agent tenidap on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of prednisolone.

The effect of tenidap, a new nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent, on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of prednisolone was studied in healthy male subjects. In a randomized crossover study, 12 subjects received either tenidap sodium 120 mg daily or placebo orally for 28 days. On day 21, each subject received a single dose of either 0.8 mg/kg oral prednisone or 0.66 mg/kg intravenous prednisolone followed by the other steroid on day 28. Blood and urine samples were collected, and the pharmacokinetic parameters of prednisone and prednisolone were determined in each treatment period. Pretreatment with tenidap did not cause any significant changes in the overall disposition of prednisone or prednisolone. For example, for free prednisolone, the intravenous area under concentration was 1,144 +/- 195 ng.h/mL and 1,244 +/- 140 ng.h/mL, and the systemic availability after oral prednisone was 53 +/- 10% and 51 +/- 12% with placebo and tenidap, respectively. The renal clearance of prednisolone was significantly reduced after tenidap pretreatment, however (from 143 to 77 mL/min/1.73 m2). The suppression of plasma cortisol and whole blood histamine levels were analyzed to evaluate the potential pharmacodynamic interactions between tenidap and prednisolone. There were no significant changes in the pharmacodynamic parameters between placebo and tenidap groups. The excretion of less than 20% of the dose of prednisolone in urine makes the overall effects of tenidap on prednisolone kinetics and dynamics of inconsequential clinical importance.

Sertraline does not alter steady-state concentrations or renal clearance of lithium in healthy volunteers.

An open-label, placebo-controlled study was conducted to determine the effects of sertraline on the steady-state levels and renal clearance of lithium in 20 healthy volunteers. Subjects received 600 mg of lithium twice daily for 9 days. On the evening of day 8, subjects received orally either placebo or 100 mg of sertraline; these were administered twice, 8 hours apart, beginning 2 hours after the evening dose of lithium. In a comparison of day 8 with day 9 (before administration of the morning doses of lithium), sertraline was associated with only a 0.01 mEq/L (1.4%) decrease in steady-state levels and a 0.11 L/hour (6.9%) increase in the renal clearance of lithium. Neither change was statistically significant relative to placebo. Four subjects were excluded from analysis because of protocol violations or laboratory abnormalities unrelated to sertraline. Seven subjects who received lithium plus sertraline experienced side effects, mainly tremors, possibly related to treatment, whereas none of those administered lithium plus placebo experienced side effects. No sertraline-related laboratory abnormalities were observed.

The effect of timing of a standard meal on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the novel atypical antipsychotic agent ziprasidone.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of a high-fat meal on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the novel atypical antipsychotic drug ziprasidone. DESIGN: Open, randomized, three-way crossover study. SETTING: University-based research facility. SUBJECTS: Eight healthy male volunteers. INTERVENTIONS: Ziprasidone 20 mg was administered under fasting conditions (treatment A), and directly after (treatment B) and 2 hours after (treatment C) a standard high-fat breakfast. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Serial blood samples were obtained over 36 hours. Three objective psychometric tests were employed to evaluate daytime vigilance at baseline and 2 hours after each dose. Ziprasidone had a significant effect on area under the curve (AUC0-infinity), maximum serum concentration, and half-life (analysis of variance all p<0.05), with the mean AUC0-infinity being significantly greater (627.2 +/- 206.4 vs 371.0 +/- 126.5 ng x hr/ml, ANOVA with Bonferroni's criteria p<0.016) and half-life significantly shorter (4.7 +/- 0.8 vs 6.6 +/- 1.3 hrs, ANOVA with Bonferroni's criteria p<0.016) after treatment B compared with treatment A. Although similar trends were observed after treatment C compared with treatment A, the differences did not reach statistical significance when Bonferroni's correction criteria were applied (p>0.016). CONCLUSION: These data suggest an increase in systemic exposure to the highly lipophilic compound ziprasidone when taken after fatty foods, possibly due to improved drug dissolution and solubilization. The drug's longer half-life under fasting conditions may reflect dissolution-limited absorption, although this could not be directly assessed. Despite postprandial increases in ziprasidone AUC0-infinity and maximum concentration, daytime vigilance was not affected.

Current status of targeted therapy for anaplastic lymphoma kinase-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer.

The identification of chromosomal rearrangements involving the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene in ~3-5% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tissues and the demonstration that the first-in-class ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor, crizotinib, can effectively target these tumors represent a significant advance in the evolution of personalized medicine for NSCLC. Single-arm studies demonstrating rapid and durable responses in the majority of ALK-positive NSCLC patients treated with crizotinib have been followed by a randomized phase III clinical trial in which superiority of crizotinib over chemotherapy was seen in previously treated ALK-positive NSCLC patients. However, despite the initial responses, most patients develop acquired resistance to crizotinib. Several novel therapeutic approaches targeting ALK-positive NSCLC are currently under evaluation in clinical trials, including second-generation ALK inhibitors, such as LDK378, CH5424802 (RO5424802802), and AP26113, and heat shock protein 90 inhibitors.

Pharmacokinetics/genotype associations for major cytochrome P450 enzymes in native and first- and third-generation Japanese populations: comparison with Korean, Chinese, and Caucasian populations.

Application of foreign clinical data across geographic regions can accelerate drug development. Drug disposition can be variable, and identification of factors influencing responsible pharmacokinetic/pharmacogenomic approaches could facilitate the universal application of foreign data and reduce the total amount of phase III clinical trials evaluating risks in different populations. Our objective was to establish and compare genotype (major cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes)/phenotype associations for Japanese (native and first- and third-generation Japanese living abroad), Caucasian, Chinese, and Korean populations using a standard drug panel. The mean metabolic ratios (MRs) for the four ethnic groups were similar except for a lower activity of CYP2D6 in Caucasians and CYP2C19 in Asians. Genotype, not ethnicity, impacted the MR for CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP2D6; neither affected CYP1A2, CYP2E1, and CYP3A4/5 activities. We conclude that equivalent plasma drug concentrations and metabolic profiles can be expected for native Japanese, first- and third-generation Japanese, Koreans, and Chinese for compounds handled through these six CYP enzymes.

Drug interactions with fluconazole.

Fluconazole, a water-soluble bis-triazole antifungal agent that effectively penetrates the cerebrospinal fluid, is a highly selective inhibitor of the fungal cytochrome P450 system. In single-dose studies, coadministration of cimetidine and fluconazole (100 mg) resulted in an insignificant decrease in the absorption of fluconazole. The coadministration of rifampin and fluconazole (200 mg) decreased both the half-life and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of fluconazole. In multiple-dose studies, fluconazole (50 mg) did not significantly alter the pharmacokinetics of the two steroid components of an oral contraceptive. Coadministration of tolbutamide with fluconazole (100 mg) increased both the maximal plasma concentration and the AUC of tolbutamide without changing levels of blood glucose. The coadministration of cyclosporin A with a low dose of fluconazole (100 mg) was not associated with significant changes in the minimal and the maximal plasma concentrations of cyclosporin A. While higher doses of fluconazole (200 mg) did not affect endogenous steroids, coadministration resulted in changes in the pharmacodynamics of warfarin and the pharmacokinetics of phenytoin and cyclosporin A.

Cimetidine does not alter the clearance or plasma binding of tenidap in healthy male volunteers.

1. An open-label, placebo-controlled study was conducted to examine the effect of cimetidine on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of tenidap. 2. Twenty-four healthy volunteers received tenidap sodium (120 mg) each morning throughout the study. On day 14 plasma levels of tenidap had reached steady state; half of the subjects were treated concomitantly with cimetidine 800 mg at night, while the other half received placebo. Allocation of cimetidine or placebo was randomised. Plasma profiles of tenidap were measured on days 14 and 16. 3. The addition of cimetidine did not significantly affect the Cmax, tmax, or lambda z of tenidap. The AUC(0,24h) increased by 4% between days 14 and 16 in the cimetidine treatment group, compared with a decrease of 2% in the placebo group. This small difference is statistically significant (P = 0.047), but it is not considered to be clinically relevant. 4. It is concluded that concomitant administration of cimetidine does not significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of tenidap at steady state.