Impact of Surgical Lighting on Intraoperative Safety in Low-Resource Settings: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Surgical Providers.

BACKGROUND: Safe surgery requires high-quality, reliable lighting of the surgical field. Little is reported on the quality or potential safety impact of surgical lighting in low-resource settings, where power failures are common and equipment and resources are limited. METHODS: Members of the Lifebox Foundation created a novel, non-mandatory, 18-item survey tool using an iterative process. This was distributed to surgical providers practicing in low-resource settings through surgical societies and mailing lists. RESULTS: We received 100 complete responses, representing a range of surgical centres from 39 countries. Poor-quality surgical field lighting was reported by 40% of respondents, with 32% reporting delayed or cancelled operations due to poor lighting and 48% reporting electrical power failures at least once per week. Eighty per cent reported the quality of their surgical lighting presents a patient safety risk with 18% having direct experience of poor-quality lighting leading to negative patient outcomes. When power outages occur, 58% of surgeons rely on a backup generator and 29% operate by mobile phone light. Only 9% of respondents regularly use a surgical headlight, with the most common barriers reported as unaffordability and poor in-country suppliers. CONCLUSIONS: In our survey of surgeons working in low-resource settings, a majority report poor surgical lighting as a major risk to patient safety and nearly one-third report delayed or cancelled operations due to poor lighting. Developing and distributing robust, affordable, high-quality surgical headlights could provide an ideal solution to this significant surgical safety issue.

Identifying resource needs for sepsis care and guideline implementation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: a cluster survey of 66 hospitals in four eastern provinces.

The ongoing conflict in the Eastern Republic of the Congo (DRC) has claimed up to 5.4 million lives by 2008. Whereas few deaths were directly due to violence, most victims died from medical conditions such as infectious diseases. This survey investigates the availability of resources required to provide adequate sepsis care in Eastern DRC. The study was conducted as a self-reported, questionnaire-based survey in four Eastern provinces of the DRC. Questionnaires were sent to a cluster of 80 urban-based hospitals in the North Kivu, South Kivu, Maniema and Orientale provinces. The questionnaire contained 74 questions on the availability of resources required to adequately treat sepsis patients as suggested by the latest Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guidelines. Sixty-six questionnaires were returned (82.5%) and analyzed. Crystalloid solutions and intravenous fluid giving sets were the only resources constantly available in all hospitals. None of the respondents reported to have constant access to piperacillin, carbapenems, fresh frozen plasma, platelets, dobutamine, activated protein C, echocardiography or equipment to measure lactate levels, invasive blood pressure, central venous pressure, cardiac output, pulmonary artery pressure or endtidal carbon dioxide. No respondent stated that a mechanical ventilator, syringe pump, fluid infuser, peritoneal dialysis or haemodialysis/hemofiltration machine was constantly available at his/her hospital. Resources required for consistent implementation of the SSC guidelines were not available in any hospital. care and implement the SSC guidelines in a cluster of hospitals in the Eastern DRC.

Global operating theatre distribution and pulse oximetry supply: an estimation from reported data.

BACKGROUND: Surgery is an essential part of health care, but resources to ensure the availability of surgical services are often inadequate. We estimated the global distribution of operating theatres and quantified the availability of pulse oximetry, which is an essential monitoring device during surgery and a potential measure of operating theatre resources. METHODS: We calculated ratios of the number of operating theatres to hospital beds in seven geographical regions worldwide on the basis of profiles from 769 hospitals in 92 countries that participated in WHO's safe surgery saves lives initiative. We used hospital bed figures from 190 WHO member states to estimate the number of operating theatres per 100,000 people in 21 subregions throughout the world. To estimate availability of pulse oximetry, we sent surveys to anaesthesia providers in 72 countries selected to ensure a geographically and demographically diverse sample. A predictive regression model was used to estimate the pulse oximetry need for countries that did not provide data. FINDINGS: The estimated number of operating theatres ranged from 1·0 (95% CI 0·9-1·2) per 100,000 people in west sub-Saharan Africa to 25·1 (20·9-30·1) per 100,000 in eastern Europe. High-income subregions all averaged more than 14 per 100,000 people, whereas all low-income subregions, representing 2·2 billion people, had fewer than two theatres per 100,000. Pulse oximetry data from 54 countries suggested that around 77,700 (63,195-95,533) theatres worldwide (19·2% [15·2-23·9]) were not equipped with pulse oximeters. INTERPRETATION: Improvements in public-health strategies and monitoring are needed to reduce disparities for more than 2 billion people without adequate access to surgical care. FUNDING: WHO.

Paediatric surgery and anaesthesia in south-western Uganda: a cross-sectional survey.

OBJECTIVE: to study paediatric surgery rates in south-western Uganda, compare them to rates in England, and determine if existing surgical facilities and workforce meet World Health Organization (WHO) standards. METHODS: to obtain information on surgical facilities and workforce, we conducted a cross-sectional survey of all hospitals performing major surgery in 14 districts of south-western Uganda in 2007-2008. Using theatre logbook data, we determined the surgical rates, types of surgery performed and in-theatre surgical outcomes. FINDINGS: of 72 hospitals surveyed, 29 were performing major surgery. None met WHO standards for essential surgery. There were 0.7 accredited surgeons per 100.000 population and no paediatric surgeons. Most anaesthetists were not physicians (accredited anaesthetist per 100.000 population: 1.1). The annual surgical rate for children aged ≤ 14 years was 180 operations per 100.000 population; most were emergency procedures. The annual surgical rate for patients of all ages was 652 operations per 100.000 population, with a median of 422 per operating theatre (range: 60-3497) and of 226 per surgeon (range: 60-1748). Mission or nongovernmental organization (NGO) hospitals, which had 44% of the hospital beds in the region, performed 3039 (55%) of the paediatric operations. Externally funded surgeons performed 80% of the 140 cleft lip and palate operations. Four in-theatre deaths occurred in children ≤ 14 years old (in-theatre mortality: 7.7 deaths per 10.000 operations). CONCLUSION: access to all surgery, including paediatric surgery, is poor in south-western Uganda and investment in basic health-care facilities and surgical workforce and training is urgently needed. Mission and NGO hospitals make a valuable contribution to elective surgery, and externally funded surgeons make an important contribution to specialist surgery. In-theatre mortality was lower than reported for similar settings.

An iterative process of global quality improvement: the International Standards for a Safe Practice of Anesthesia 2010.

PURPOSE: To enhance patient safety through contemporaneous and comprehensive standards for a safe practice of anesthesia that augment, enhance, and support similar standards already published by various countries and that provide a resource for countries that have yet to formulate such standards. STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT: The Safe Anesthesia Working Group of the World Health Organization's "Safe Surgery Saves Lives" global initiative updated the 1992 International Standards for the Safe Practice of Anaesthesia (Standards) through an iterative process of literature review, consultation, debate, drafting, and refinement. These Standards address, in detail, the organization, support, practices, and infrastructure for anesthesia care. The Standards are grounded in the fundamental principle of safety in anesthesia, i.e., the continuous presence of an appropriately trained, vigilant anesthesia professional. In effect, the use of pulse oximetry during anesthesia is now considered mandatory, with acknowledgement that compromise may be unavoidable in emergencies. At the World Congress of Anaesthesiologists in 2008, drafts were presented for comment, further refinements were made, and the Revised Standards were adopted by the World Federation of Societies of Anaesthesiologists (WFSA). These Revised Standards were posted on the WFSA website for further feedback, and minor revisions followed. The International Standards for a Safe Practice of Anesthesia 2010 were endorsed by the Executive Committee of the WFSA in March 2010. Ongoing periodic revision is planned. CONCLUSION: While they are universally applicable, the 2010 Standards primarily target lesser-resourced areas. They are designed particularly for regions that have yet to formulate or adopt their own standards so as to promote optimum patient outcomes in every anesthetizing location in the world.

Con: anesthesia for children in the developing world should be delivered by medical anesthetists.

Surgical care for pediatric patients in poor countries is severely limited by the availability of surgeons, healthcare resources and investment in anesthesia services. Where a surgical service exists, a shortage of trained medical anesthetists limits the care that can be delivered. Where no doctors are available to administer anesthesia, some countries have utilized nonmedical anesthesia providers to provide a service. These providers should be integrated with, and supported by, their medical colleagues to ensure safe practice. Action at governmental level is required to resolve the difficult issues described in this paper.

Surgical time out checklist with debriefing and multidisciplinary feedback improves venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in thoracic surgery: a prospective audit.

OBJECTIVES: There is a significant global burden of preventable morbidity and mortality after surgery caused by avoidable adverse events. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis, despite evidence for its efficacy, is not reliably and consistently prescribed, and is currently a serious concern for patient safety. The aim of this study was to prospectively audit errors captured by an extended surgical time out checklist and relate them to the introduction of a safety culture. METHODS: The use of an extended surgical time out checklist was prospectively audited, in consecutive patients in one operating theatre over a period of two years. Errors captured were analysed and related to other improvements to safety culture; human factors training, debriefing and regular departmental meetings. RESULTS: Time out was performed in 959 patients of 990 (96.8%) undergoing thoracic surgery. Performance was consistent over time. Errors were categorized as VTE prophylaxis (n = 53, 6%), blood products (n = 11), clerical (n = 5), imaging (n = 2) and miscellaneous (n = 2). After a lag period of 15 months, during which the team underwent human factors training, introduced debriefing and escalated VTE prophylaxis to regular departmental meetings, VTE prophylaxis errors were substantially reduced. The temporal relationship between error capture and error elimination is explored. CONCLUSIONS: Use of checklists alongside appropriate human factors training, debriefing and regular multidisciplinary communication can substantially improve VTE prophylaxis in patients undergoing surgery.

A survey of the status of education and research in anaesthesia and intensive care medicine at the University Teaching Hospital in Lusaka, Zambia.

BACKGROUND: Current knowledge of the situation of anaesthesia in developing countries is limited. A survey of the status of education and research based on hospital records, records of the anaesthesia section, nursing records, personal observations as well as personal communication with staff, patients and hospital managers was carried out in a 1863-bed university teaching hospital located in the capital of a least developed Sub-Saharan African Country. METHODS: Classification and evaluation of the data was based on the three aspects of the role of university teaching hospitals in Western countries: (I) patient care, (II) university teaching and post-graduation training, as well as (III) research activities. The section "patient care" was sub-divided into anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and pain therapy. The Department of Anaesthesia at the University Teaching Hospital of Lusaka, Zambia, is organized as a subdivision of the surgical department and is not involved in emergency medicine or pain therapy. Thirteen out of seventeen operating theatres, one recovery room, and a ten bed intensive care unit are serviced by the Department of Anaesthesia. RESULTS: Anaesthetic equipment, medical supplies, drugs, and consumables are all in limited supply. There are limited statistics on perioperative complications and mortality. Anaesthesia at the university teaching hospital of a least developed Sub-Saharan African Country is severely short of both a workforce and resources. CONCLUSION: We have described strategies which may help to reverse this trend, the most important of which is to promote anaesthesia as an essential specialty within hospitals in developing countries.