Influence of Deceased Donor and Pretransplant Recipient Parameters on Early Overall Kidney Graft-Survival in Germany.

Background. Scarcity of grafts for kidney transplantation (KTX) caused an increased consideration of deceased donors with substantial risk factors. There is no agreement on which ones are detrimental for overall graft-survival. Therefore, we investigated in a nationwide multicentre study the impact of donor and recipient related risks known before KTX on graft-survival based on the original data used for allocation and graft acceptance. Methods. A nationwide deidentified multicenter study-database was created of data concerning kidneys donated and transplanted in Germany between 2006 and 2008 as provided by the national organ procurement organization (Deutsche Stiftung Organtransplantation) and BQS Institute. Multiple Cox regression (significance level 5%, hazard ratio [95% CI]) was conducted (n = 4411, isolated KTX). Results. Risk factors associated with graft-survival were donor age (1.020 [1.013-1.027] per year), donor size (0.985 [0.977-0.993] per cm), donor's creatinine at admission (1.002 [1.001-1.004] per µmol/L), donor treatment with catecholamine (0.757 [0.635-0.901]), and reduced graft-quality at procurement (1.549 [1.217-1.973]), as well as recipient age (1.012 [1.003-1.021] per year), actual panel reactive antibodies (1.007 [1.002-1.011] per percent), retransplantation (1.850 [1.484-2.306]), recipient's cardiovascular comorbidity (1.436 [1.212-1.701]), and use of IL2-receptor antibodies for induction (0.741 [0.619-0.887]). Conclusion. Some donor characteristics persist to impact graft-survival (e.g., age) while the effect of others could be mitigated by elaborate donor-recipient match and care.

Oil Red O-assessed macrosteatosis in liver transplant donor biopsies predicts ischemia-reperfusion injury and clinical outcome.

Steatosis in donor livers is an accepted adverse prognostic factor after liver transplantation. While its semiquantitative assessment shows varying reproducibility, it is questioned as a standard method. Additionally, the influence of hepatic steatosis on ischemia/reperfusion injury (I/R injury) has not been evaluated in biopsies after reperfusion. We compared different staining and analyzing methods for the assessment of donor liver steatosis in order to predict I/R injury and clinical outcome after transplantation. To do this, 56 paired pre- and post-reperfusion liver biopsies were analyzed for macro- (MaS)/micro- (MiS) and total steatosis in cryo and permanent sections by special fat (Oil Red O or ORO) and standard stains. Computerized morphometrical analyses were compared to the semiquantitative assessment by a pathologist. I/R injury was determined histopathologically and by M30 immunohistochemistry. We found ORO to be more sensitive in detecting hepatic steatosis with higher reproducibility for MaS. Semiquantitative analyses were highly reproducible and not inferior to computerized morphometry. Categorized MaS as determined by ORO correlated with the extent of I/R injury, initial poor function, liver enzymes, and survival. Therefore fat stains like ORO are a reliable and easy method comprising significant advantages in the evaluation of hepatic steatosis and are thereby of prognostic value. Computerized analysis is a precise tool though not superior to semiquantitative analyses.