Continuous Versus Intermittent Control Cuff Pressure for Preventing Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: An Updated Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of continuous control cuff pressure (CCCP) versus intermittent control cuff pressure (ICCP) for the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in critically ill patients. METHODS: Relevant literature was searched in several databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, ProQuest, the Cochrane Library, Wanfang Database and China National Knowledge Infrastructure between inception and September 2022. Randomized controlled trials were considered eligible if they compared CCCP with ICCP for the prevention of VAP in critically ill patients. This meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.3 and Trial Sequential Analysis 0.9 software packages. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework was used to assess the level of evidence. RESULTS: We identified 14 randomized control trials with a total of 2080 patients. Meta-analysis revealed that CCCP was associated with a significantly lower incidence of VAP compared with ICCP (relative risk [RR] = 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.37-0.74; P < 0.001), although considerable heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 71%). Conducting trial sequential analysis confirmed the finding, and the GRADE level was moderate. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that CCCP combined with subglottic secretion drainage (SSD) had a more significant effect on reducing VAP (RR = 0.39; 95% CI = 0.29-0.52; P < 0.001). The effect of CCCP on ventilator-associated respiratory infection (VARI) incidence was uncertain (RR = 0.81; 95% CI = 0.53-1.24; P = 0.34; I2 = 61%). Additionally, CCCP significantly reduced the duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) (mean difference [MD] = -2.42 days; 95% CI = -4.71-0.12; P = 0.04; I2 = 87%). Descriptive analysis showed that CCCP improved the qualified rate of cuff pressure. However, no significant differences were found in the length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay (MD = 2.42 days; 95% CI = -1.84-6.68; P = 0.27) and ICU mortality (RR = 0.86; 95% CI = 0.74-1.00; P = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the combination of CCCP and SSD can reduce the incidence of VAP and the duration of MV and maintain the stability of cuff pressure. A combination of CCCP and SSD applications is suggested for preventing VAP.

Efficacy of Endotracheal Tube Cuff Modification in Preventing Ventilator-associated Pneumonia.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of modifying the cuff on preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were systematically searched from inception to April 2022, for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effect of a new type of cuff intubation with traditional cuff intubation on VAP incidence and intensive-care unit (ICU) mortality in mechanically ventilated patients. Nine RCTs with 1937 patients were finally evaluated. The pooled results for the incidence of VAP showed that the modified cuff significantly decreased the morbidity of VAP compared with the traditional cuff (relative ratio (RR) = 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56-0.95, p = 0.02). The subgroup analysis revealed that polyurethane (PU) cuff (RR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.46-1.48, p = 0.52), conical cuff (RR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.73-1.28, p = 0.82) and PU-conical cuff (RR = 1.36, 95% CI 0.85-2.18, p = 0.20) did not decrease the incidence of VAP. Moreover, the improved cuff combined with subglottic secretion drainage (SSD) could significantly reduce the VAP incidence (RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.44-0.77, p = 0.0001). In terms of ICU mortality, there was no statistically significant difference (RR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.68-1.02, p = 0.08) between the two groups. The modified cuff is superior to the traditional cuff in VAP prevention. In particular, the modified cuff combined with subglottic secretion drainage has more advantages. Key Words: Ventilator-associated pneumonia, Intubation, Endotracheal cuff, Intensive care unit, Meta-analysis.

Status and Risk Factors in Patients Requiring Unplanned Intensive Care Unit Readmission Within 48 Hours: A Retrospective Propensity-Matched Study in China.

Aim: This study investigated the current status and related risk factors of 48-hour unplanned return to the intensive care unit (ICU) to reduce the return rate and improve the quality of critical care management. Methods: Data were collected from 2365 patients discharged from the comprehensive ICU. Multivariate and 1:1 propensity score matching analyses were performed. Results: Forty patients (1.69%) had unplanned readmission to the ICU within 48 hours after transfer. The primary reason for return was respiratory failure (16 patients, 40%). Furthermore, respiratory failure (odds ratio [OR] = 5.994, p = 0.02) and the number of organ failures (OR = 5.679, p = 0.006) were independent risk factors for unplanned ICU readmission. Receiver operating characteristic curves were drawn for the predictive value of the number of organ injuries during a patient's unplanned transfer to the ICU (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.744, sensitivity = 60%, specificity = 77.5%). Conclusion: The reason for patient transfer and the number of organ injuries during the process were independent risk factors for patients who were critically ill. The number of organs damaged had a predictive value on whether the patient would return to the ICU within 48 hours.