Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Publication year range
1.
Inj Prev ; 21(2): 98-108, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25062752

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to simultaneously evaluate the effectiveness of a range of interventions to increase the possession of safety equipment or behaviours to prevent falls in children under 5 years of age in the home. METHODS: A recently published systematic review identified studies to be included in a network meta-analysis; an extension of pairwise meta-analysis that enables comparison of all evaluated interventions simultaneously, including comparisons not directly compared in individual studies. RESULTS: 29 primary studies were identified, of which 16 were included in at least 1 of 4 network meta-analyses. For increasing possession of a fitted stair gate, the most intensive intervention (including education, low cost/free home safety equipment, home safety inspection and fitting) was the most likely to be the most effective, with an OR versus usual care of 7.80 (95% CrI 3.08 to 21.3). For reducing possession or use of a baby walker: education only was most likely to be most effective, with an OR versus usual care of 0.48 (95% CrI 0.31 to 0.84). Little difference was found between interventions for possession of window locks (most intensive intervention versus usual care OR=1.56 (95% CrI 0.02 to 89.8)) and for not leaving a child alone on a high surface (education vs usual care OR=0.89 (95% CrI 0.10 to 9.67)). There was insufficient evidence for network meta-analysis for possession and use of bath mats. CONCLUSIONS: These results will inform healthcare providers of the most effective components of interventions and can be used in cost-effectiveness analyses.


Asunto(s)
Prevención de Accidentes/métodos , Accidentes por Caídas/prevención & control , Accidentes Domésticos/prevención & control , Servicios de Salud del Niño/organización & administración , Preescolar , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Educación en Salud/métodos , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Equipos de Seguridad/estadística & datos numéricos
2.
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot ; 23(1): 3-28, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26401890

RESUMEN

Unintentional poisoning is a significant child public health problem. This systematic overview of reviews, supplemented with a systematic review of recently published primary studies synthesizes evidence on non-legislative interventions to reduce childhood poisonings in the home with particular reference to interventions that could be implemented by Children's Centres in England or community health or social care services in other high income countries. Thirteen systematic reviews, two meta-analyses and 47 primary studies were identified. The interventions most commonly comprised education, provision of cupboard/drawer locks, and poison control centre (PCC) number stickers. Meta-analyses and primary studies provided evidence that interventions improved poison prevention practices. Twenty eight per cent of studies reporting safe medicine storage (OR from meta-analysis 1.57, 95% CI 1.22-2.02), 23% reporting safe storage of other products (OR from meta-analysis 1.63, 95% CI 1.22-2.17) and 46% reporting availability of PCC numbers (OR from meta-analysis 3.67, 95% CI 1.84-7.33) demonstrated significant effects favouring the intervention group. There was a lack of evidence that interventions reduced poisoning rates. Parents should be provided with poison prevention education, cupboard/drawer locks and emergency contact numbers to use in the event of a poisoning. Further research is required to determine whether improving poison prevention practices reduces poisoning rates.


Asunto(s)
Accidentes Domésticos/prevención & control , Intoxicación/prevención & control , Niño , Humanos
3.
Burns ; 41(5): 907-24, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25841997

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To synthesise and evaluate the evidence of the effectiveness of interventions to prevent scalds in children. METHODS: An overview of systematic reviews (SR) and a SR of primary studies were performed evaluating interventions to prevent scalds in children. A comprehensive literature search was conducted covering various resources up to October 2012. Experimental and controlled observational studies reporting scald injuries, safety practices and safety equipment use were included. RESULTS: Fourteen systematic reviews and 39 primary studies were included. There is little evidence that interventions are effective in reducing the incidence of scalds in children. More evidence was found that inventions are effective in promoting safe hot tap water temperature, especially when home safety education, home safety checks and discounted or free safety equipment including thermometers and thermostatic mixing valves were provided. No consistent evidence was found for the effectiveness of interventions on the safe handling of hot food or drinks nor improving kitchen safety practices. CONCLUSION: Education, home safety checks along with thermometers or thermostatic mixing valves should be promoted to reduce tap water scalds. Further research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions on scald injuries and to disentangle the effects of multifaceted interventions on scald injuries and safety practices.


Asunto(s)
Accidentes Domésticos/prevención & control , Quemaduras/prevención & control , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Información de Salud al Consumidor , Culinaria , Humanos , Lactante , Ingeniería Sanitaria/instrumentación , Termómetros
4.
Accid Anal Prev ; 60: 158-71, 2013 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24080473

RESUMEN

In most countries falls are the most common medically attended childhood injury and the majority of injuries in pre-school children occur at home. Numerous systematic reviews have reviewed evidence of the effectiveness of falls prevention interventions, but this evidence has not been synthesised into an overview, making it difficult for policy makers and practitioners to easily access the evidence. To synthesise all available evidence, we conducted an overview of reviews of home safety interventions targeting childhood falls, extracted data from primary studies included in the reviews and supplemented this with a systematic review of primary studies published subsequent to the reviews. Bibliographic databases, websites, conference proceedings, journals and bibliographies of included studies were searched for systematic reviews of studies with experimental or controlled observational designs. Thirteen reviews were identified containing 24 primary studies. Searches for additional primary studies identified five further studies not included in reviews. Evidence of the effect of interventions on falls or fall injuries was sparse, with only one of three primary studies reporting this outcome finding a reduction in falls. Interventions were effective in promoting the use of safety gates and furniture corner covers. There was some evidence of a reduction in baby walker use. The effect on the use of window safety devices, non-slip bath mats/decals and the reduction of tripping hazards was mixed. There was limited evidence that interventions were effective in improving lighting in corridors, altering furniture layout and restricting access to roofs. Most interventions to prevent childhood falls at home have not been evaluated in terms of their effect on reducing falls. Policy makers and practitioners should promote use of safety gates and furniture covers and restriction of baby walker use. Further research evaluating the effect of interventions to reduce falls and falls-related injuries is urgently required.


Asunto(s)
Prevención de Accidentes/métodos , Accidentes por Caídas/prevención & control , Accidentes Domésticos/prevención & control , Protección a la Infancia , Prevención de Accidentes/instrumentación , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Equipos de Seguridad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda