RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Accidental pharyngeal fishbone ingestion is a common complaint in ear, nose, and throat clinics. Approximately two-thirds of the accidentally ingested fishbones can be removed using tongue depressors and indirect laryngoscopy. However, the remaining third is challenging to identify and remove using these methods. These difficult fishbones require identification and removal via more advanced approaches. Video-guided laryngoscope is used to deal with difficult fishbones in our center. This study aimed to explore the risk factors for difficult fishbones. METHODS: A prospective study was performed at a teaching hospital on 2080 patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the risk factors. RESULTS: The common fishbone locations were the tonsils (39.8%; defined as STEP-I), tongue base (37.1%), vallecula (13.3%; STEP-II), and hypopharynx (9.8%; STEP-III). With increasing STEP level, the ratio of difficult fishbones correspondingly increased (Z = 13.919, P < .001), and the proportions were 21.1%, 41.9%, and 70% in STEP-I, II, and III, respectively. In particular, fishbones in STEP-III (vs STEP-I) had a higher risk of difficult fishbones (odds ratio [OR]: 11.573, 95% CI: 7.987-16.769). Complaints of neck pain (yes vs no), foreign body sensation (yes vs no), and shorter length of fishbones always had a lower risk of difficult fishbones (OR: 0.455, 95% CI: 0.367-0.564; OR: 0.284, 95% CI: 0.191-0.422; OR: 0.727, 95% CI: 0.622-0.85). Missing teeth (yes vs no), swallowing behavior after fishbone ingestion (yes vs no), and male patients (vs female) had a higher risk of difficult fishbones (OR: 1.9, 95% CI: 1.47-2.456; OR: 1.631, 95% CI: 1.293-2.059; OR: 1.278, 95% CI: 1.047-1.56). CONCLUSIONS: Neck pain, foreign body sensation, fishbone length, patient age and sex, tooth status, and swallowing behavior after fishbone ingestion are independent risk factors for difficult fishbones.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the usefulness of high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) densitometry in the diagnosis of otosclerosis and to investigate the relationship between CT densitometry and audiometry. METHODS: HRCT findings and audiometry were compared among 34 patients (34 ears, the otosclerosis group) with surgically confirmed otosclerosis between January 2007 and December 2007 and 33 patients (33 opposite normal ears, the control group) with facial paralysis diagnosed at the same period of time. Seven regions of interest (ROI) were set manually around the otic capsule on the axial slice of 0.75-mm-thick CT image. The mean CT values of these seven regions were measured. In each ROI, the mean CT value of the otosclerosis group and that of the control group were compared. Based on the CT findings, the ears with otosclerosis were classified into two groups: Group A showed no pathological CT findings; Group B showed low density around the cochlea. In the otosclerosis group, the relationship between the findings of CT and the results of audiometry was analyzed. RESULTS: The mean CT values in the area posterior to the oval window and anterior to the oval window were significantly lower for the otosclerosis group compared with the control group (the former t=-2.030, p=0.046; the latter Z=-4.979, p<0.01). Group A consisted of 30 patients, 7 of which (23.33%) exhibited conductive hearing loss, and 23 of which (76.67%) exhibited mixed hearing loss; Group B had 4 patients, all with mixed hearing loss. For the otosclerosis group, the mean CT value in the area posterior to the oval window was positively correlated with the mean air conduction threshold (r=0.4273, p=0.0117) and with the mean air-bone gap (r=0.3995, p=0.0192). CONCLUSION: Quantitative evaluation of CT with slices less than 1mm in thickness may provide important information for the diagnosis and assessment of otosclerosis which are unattainable through other methods.