The anti-scar effect of tyrosine-kinase inhibitor nintedanib in experimental glaucoma filtration surgery in rabbits.

PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy of nintedanib on preventing postoperative scar in formation following glaucoma filtering surgery (GFC) in rabbits in comparison with Mitomycin-C (MMC). DESIGN: Experimental Animal Study. METHODS: 24 New Zealand rabbits were divided randomly into 3 groups as Sham, Nindetanib and MMC(n = 8). Limbal-based trabeculectomy was performed on the right eyes of the rabbits. Left eyes that did'nt undergo surgery were included in the control group (n = 8). Following surgery, Intraocular pressures (IOP), postoperative complications and morphological changes in the bleb were evaluated. On the 28th day, eight eyes from each group were enucleated and histologically and immunohistochemically analyzed. Matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2), Transforming Growth Factor-1 (TGF-B1) and alpha-smooth muscle actin (a-SMA) were evaluated. RESULTS: It was observed that nintedanib has no side effects and reduces subconjunctival fibrosis. Postoperative IOP values in the Nindetanib group were lower than the other groups (p < 0.05). The longest bleb survival was observed in the Nintedanib group and the shortest in the Sham group (p < 0.001). Conjunctival vascularity and inflammation was reduced in the Nintedanib group compared to the Sham group (p < 0.05). The highest subconjunctival fibrosis was observed in the Sham group and the least in the Nintedanib group (p < 0.05). Although the fibrosis score was found lower in the Nintedanib group compared to the MMC(p > 0.05). α-SMA TGF-ß1, MMP-2 expressions were similar in Nintedanib and MMC groups (p > 0.05), however, it was observed that significantly decreased in both groups compared to Sham group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: It has been observed that Nindetanib suppress fibroblast proliferation Thus, It may be a drug that can prevent subconjunctival fibrosis in GFC.

Corneal confocal microscopy identifies corneal nerve fiber loss in patients with migraine.

BACKGROUND/HYPOTHESIS: Migraine affects >1 billion people but its pathophysiology remains poorly understood. Alterations in the trigeminovascular system play an important role. We have compared corneal nerve morphology in patients with migraine to healthy controls. METHODS: Sixty patients with episodic (n = 32) or chronic (n = 28) migraine and 20 age-matched healthy control subjects were studied cross-sectionally. Their migraine characteristics and signs and symptoms of dry eyes were assessed. Manual and automated quantification of corneal nerves was undertaken by corneal confocal microscopy. RESULTS: In patients with migraine compared to controls, manual corneal nerve fiber density (P < 0.001), branch density (P = 0.015) and length (P < 0.001); and automated corneal nerve fiber density (P < 0.001), branch density (P < 0.001), length (P < 0.001), total branch density (P < 0.001), nerve fiber area (P < 0.001), nerve fiber width (P = 0.045) and fractal dimension (P < 0.001) were lower. Automated corneal nerve fiber density was higher in patients with episodic migraine and aura (P = 0.010); and fractal dimension (P = 0.029) was lower in patients with more headache days in the last three months. Automated corneal nerve fiber density predicted a significant amount of the observed variance in pain intensity (adjusted r2 = 0.14, partial r = -0.37, P = 0.004) in patients with migraine. CONCLUSIONS: Corneal confocal microscopy reveals corneal nerve loss in patients with migraine. It may serve as an objective imaging biomarker of neurodegeneration in migraine.

Is Corneal Subbasal Nerve Loss Associated With Meibomian Gland Loss in Inactive Mild and Moderate-to-Severe Graves' Ophthalmopathy?

PURPOSE: To evaluate meibomian gland and subbasal nerve plexus parameters in Graves' Ophthalmopathy (GO) and association of meibomian gland loss with corneal subbasal nerve plexus loss. METHODS: Fifty-two eyes of 52 mild and moderate-to-severe GO patients and 32 eyes of 32 healthy controls were enrolled. The meibomian gland dropout area (MGDA) and meibography scores were evaluated using noncontact meibography. In vivo confocal microscopy of corneal subbasal nerve plexus were conducted. ACCMetrics was used to obtain corneal parameters. RESULTS: Compared with healthy subjects, GO patients had worse upper and lower eyelid MGDA ( p < 0.001, for all) and upper, lower and total meibography scores ( p < 0.001, p = 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). Eyelid margin scores were worse in the GO group ( p < 0.001) and showed correlation with all noncontact meibography parameters ( p < 0.001 for all). All corneal subbasal nerve parameters were significantly lower in the GO group compared with the controls ( p < 0.05 for all). Subbasal nerve parameters of GO patients did not reveal a correlation with MGDA and meibography scores but showed correlations with ocular surface disease index score and Schirmer I test (r = -0.304; p = 0.042 and r = 0.336; p = 0.021, respectively). CONCLUSION: Meibomian gland and corneal nerve loss could be observed even in the inactive phase and mild GO. The lack of a correlation between meibomian gland loss and subbasal nerve loss suggests that meibomian gland loss is not a significant additional component in the pathogenesis of subbasal nerve damage in GO. Furthermore, our study revealed new evidence regarding the use of eyelid margin score to represent meibomian gland loss in GO.