RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Screening esophagogastroduodenoscopy plays an important role in the early detection of upper gastrointestinal cancer. To provide more opportunities for patients with pancreaticobiliary disease to undergo this screening, we have performed esophagogastroduodenoscopy prior to endoscopic ultrasonography. However, the usefulness of this protocol is not elucidated. This study aimed to investigate the utility of screening esophagogastroduodenoscopy in this protocol in the detection of upper gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasms. METHODS: The outcomes of screening esophagogastroduodenoscopy performed prior to endoscopic ultrasonography in patients with pancreaticobiliary disease at our hospital between April 2020 and September 2022 were investigated. A logistic regression model was used to identify factors affecting the detection of epithelial neoplasms. Additionally, we compared the detection rate of gastric epithelial neoplasms between screening esophagogastroduodenoscopy performed prior to endoscopic ultrasonography and that performed at our medical checkup center. RESULTS: A total of 615 screening esophagogastroduodenoscopies prior to endoscopic ultrasonography were performed, and 12 (2.0%) epithelial neoplasms were detected, including esophageal lesions (n = 2) and gastric lesions (n = 10). Of these lesions, 75% (9/12) underwent curative endoscopic resection. A multivariate analysis showed that open-type gastric mucosal atrophy (odds ratio, 7.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-38.4; p = 0.01) and the use of magnification endoscopy (odds ratio, 7.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.9-27.9; p < 0.01) independently affected the detection of epithelial neoplasms. The detection rate of gastric epithelial neoplasms was significantly higher using this protocol than that in our medical checkup center (1.6% versus 0.2%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A protocol of screening esophagogastroduodenoscopy prior to endoscopic ultrasonography may be recommended because epithelial neoplasms could be detected at a non-negligible rate.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Endosonografía , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Endoscopía GastrointestinalRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic resection is widely accepted as a local treatment for rectal neuroendocrine tumors sized ≤ 10 mm. However, there is no consensus on the best method for the endoscopic resection of rectal neuroendocrine tumors. As a simplified endoscopic procedure, endoscopic submucosal resection with a ligation device (ESMR-L) indicates a histologically complete resection rate comparable to that of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We hypothesized that ESMR-L than ESD would be preferred for rectal neuroendocrine tumors. Hence, this trial aimed to verify whether ESMR-L is non-inferior to ESD in terms of histologically complete resection rate. METHODS: This is a prospective, open-label, multicenter, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial of two parallel groups, conducted at the Shizuoka Cancer Center and 31 other institutions in Japan. Patients with a lesion endoscopically diagnosed as a rectal neuroendocrine tumor ≤ 10 mm are eligible for inclusion. A total of 266 patients will be recruited and randomized to undergo either ESD or ESMR-L. The primary endpoint is the rate of en bloc resection with histologically tumor-free margins (R0 resection). Secondary endpoints include en bloc resection rate, procedure time, adverse events, hospitalization days, total devices and agents cost, adverse event rate between groups with and without resection site closure, outcomes between expert and non-expert endoscopists, and factors associated with R0 resection failure. The sample size is determined based on the assumption that the R0 resection rate will be 95.2% in the ESD group and 95.3% in the ESMR-L group, with a non-inferiority margin of 8%. With a one-sided significance level of 0.05 and a power of 80%, 226 participants are required. Assuming a dropout rate of 15%, 266 patients will be included in this study. DISCUSSION: This is the first multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing ESD and ESMR-L for the R0 resection of rectal neuroendocrine tumors ≤ 10 mm. This will provide valuable information for standardizing endoscopic resection methods for rectal neuroendocrine tumors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, jRCTs042210124. Registered on Jan 6, 2022.
Asunto(s)
Resección Endoscópica de la Mucosa , Tumores Neuroendocrinos , Neoplasias del Recto , Humanos , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/cirugía , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/patología , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ligadura , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Resección Endoscópica de la Mucosa/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Estudios Multicéntricos como AsuntoRESUMEN
A 68-year-old female patient was referred to our hospital with acute cholangitis. Computed tomography revealed common bile duct dilatation, gallbladder fundal tumor, and gallbladder wall thickening attached to the tumor. Cholangiography revealed pancreaticobiliary maljunction with biliary dilation. The patient was diagnosed with pancreaticobiliary maljunction with biliary dilation and gallbladder cancer and underwent liver S4b+5 and bile duct resection and reconstruction. Pathological results revealed that the gallbladder fundal tumor included sarcoma, and the gallbladder wall thickening had adenocarcinoma;thus, the patient was diagnosed with gallbladder carcinosarcoma.
Asunto(s)
Carcinosarcoma , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar , Mala Unión Pancreaticobiliar , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/cirugía , Anciano , Carcinosarcoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinosarcoma/cirugía , Carcinosarcoma/patología , Mala Unión Pancreaticobiliar/diagnóstico por imagenAsunto(s)
Falla de Equipo , Humanos , Endosonografía/instrumentación , Endosonografía/métodos , TransductoresRESUMEN
We describe a case of a 47-year-old male patient with initially unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma of the right liver lobe with tumor thrombi extending from the right bile duct to the common and left bile ducts. Conventional chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin for 19 months resulted in progressive disease. Subsequently, a comprehensive genome profile revealed fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 rearrangement, and hence, pemigatinib administration was initiated. After 6 months of pemigatinib therapy, significant shrinking of the tumor and disappearance of the tumor thrombi in the common and left bile duct were observed. Subsequently, the patient underwent conversion surgery, resulting in successful radical resection of the tumor. The patient has been disease-free for 7 months.
RESUMEN
A 61-year-old man present to us with continued abdominal pain without abdominal tenderness for 1 month. Blood testing showed elevated biliary enzymes and inflammation. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) revealed thickening of the transverse colon with relatively strong enhancement but no bile duct dilatation. Colonoscopy revealed localized edema and granular mucosa in the transverse colon. Fluoroscopic endoscopy exhibited the absence of haustra. Multiple biopsies were performed, but differentiation between mild inflammation and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma was inconclusive. To establish a definitive diagnosis, transgastric endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy of the hypoechoic mass was performed. Histopathological analysis exhibited the proliferation of small-sized lymphocytes. Fluorescence in situ hybridization revealed the characteristic API2-MALT1 translocation of MALT lymphoma. We performed liver biopsy to investigate biliary enzyme elevation. Histopathology confirmed lymphocytic infiltration within Glisson's capsule. Immunohistochemistry showed positive for CD20 and negative for CD3 and CD5, signifying the infiltration of MALT lymphoma in the liver. Based on these findings, we diagnosed MALT lymphoma, Lugano classification Stage IV. We performed bendamustine-rituximab (BR)-combined therapy. After six courses of BR-combined therapy, colonoscopy revealed improvement in the lead pipe sign and CT revealed disappearance of the mass.
Asunto(s)
Colon Transverso , Neoplasias del Colon , Biopsia por Aspiración con Aguja Fina Guiada por Ultrasonido Endoscópico , Linfoma de Células B de la Zona Marginal , Humanos , Masculino , Linfoma de Células B de la Zona Marginal/patología , Linfoma de Células B de la Zona Marginal/diagnóstico por imagen , Linfoma de Células B de la Zona Marginal/diagnóstico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Colon Transverso/patología , Colon Transverso/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Neoplasias del Colon/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias del Colon/diagnóstico , Rituximab/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Colonoscopía , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina/administración & dosificación , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
Objectives: Endoscopic lithotripsy and elective cholecystectomy, followed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, are the first-line treatments for patients with common bile duct (CBD) stones (CBDS) and gallstones. However, this approach entails acute cholecystitis and recurrent cholangitis risk while patients await surgery. We aimed to identify acute cholecystitis and cholangitis risk factors during the waiting time for elective cholecystectomy. Methods: This study comprised 151 patients with CBDS combined with gallstones who underwent cholecystectomy within 90 days of the first endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography at two tertiary care centers between January 2019 and October 2021. Results: The incidence of biliary tract events (acute cholecystitis, acute cholangitis, or any complications requiring unplanned cholangiopancreatography) was 28% (43 cases). In univariate and multivariate analyses, plastic stent placement as a bridge to surgery for the first treatment of CBDS was an independent risk factor for biliary tract events during the waiting time for surgery (odds ratio 4.25, p = 0.002). A subgroup analysis among those with plastic stent placement revealed a CBD diameter of ≤ 10 mm as an independent risk factor for acute cholecystitis (odds ratio 4.32; p = 0.027); a CBD diameter ≥ 11 mm was an independent risk factor for acute cholangitis and unplanned re-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (odds ratio 5.66; p = 0.01). Conclusions: Plastic stent placement for CBDS before elective cholecystectomy increases the risk of acute cholecystitis or acute cholangitis during the waiting time for elective cholecystectomy.