Prevalence and Risk Factors of Constipation Symptoms among Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study.

INTRODUCTION: Constipation is one of the most common gastrointestinal symptoms. It may compromise quality of life and social functioning and result in increased healthcare use and costs. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence and risk factors of constipation symptoms, as well as those of refractory constipation symptoms among patients who underwent colonoscopy. METHODS: Over 4.5 years, patients who underwent colonoscopy and completed questionnaires were analyzed. Patients' symptoms were evaluated using the Gastrointestinal Symptoms Rating Scale. RESULTS: Among 8,621 eligible patients, the prevalence of constipation symptoms was 33.3%. Multivariate analysis revealed female sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.7, p < 0.001), older age (OR 1.3, p < 0.001), cerebral stroke with paralysis (OR 1.7, p = 0.009), chronic renal failure (OR 2.6, p < 0.001), ischemic heart disease (OR 1.3, p = 0.008), diabetes (OR 1.4, p < 0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 1.5, p = 0.002), benzodiazepine use (OR 1.7, p < 0.001), antiparkinsonian medications use (OR 1.9, p = 0.030), and opioid use (OR 2.1, p = 0.002) as independent risk factors for constipation symptoms. The number of patients taking any medication for constipation was 1,134 (13.2%); however, refractory symptoms of constipation were still present in 61.4% of these patients. Diabetes (OR 1.5, p = 0.028) and irritable bowel syndrome (OR 3.1, p < 0.001) were identified as predictors for refractory constipation symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Constipation occurred in one-third of patients, and more than half of patients still exhibited refractory symptoms of constipation despite taking laxatives. Multiple medications and concurrent diseases seem to be associated with constipation symptoms.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage with a combined internal and external drainage tubes for acute cholecystitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Lumen-apposing metal stent is widely used for endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) nowadays but not approved in many countries and might be unsuitable for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) because of its large enterocholecysto fistula. A combination of double pigtail plastic stent (DPPS) and naso-cystic tube (NCT) could overcome these problems. The aim of this study was to estimate the efficacy and safety of this method in patients with acute cholecystitis unfit for urgent cholecystectomy both as bridge to surgery and palliation. METHODS: This was a prospective, single-center feasibility study. EUS-GBD was performed with a 7Fr DPPS followed by an NCT placement. NCT was removed after 1 week. LC was performed 2 or 3 months after EUS-GBD in eligible patients. In patients who did not underwent cholecystectomy, DPPS was left in place. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were enrolled. Both technical and clinical success rates were 96% (22/23). Early adverse events rate was 13% (3/23), including one bile peritonitis, one intraperitoneal abscess, and one melena. LC was attempted in 12 patients, and conversion to open cholecystectomy was required in three (25%). Neither recurrence of cholecystitis nor late adverse event occurred during 6 months of follow up in 10 patients who did not undergo cholecystectomy. CONCLUSION: EUS-GBD with a combination of DPPS and NCT is considered an effective and safe technique both as bridge to surgery and palliation.

A phase II trial of gemcitabine, S-1 and LV combination (GSL) therapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

Purpose Our previous phase I trial suggested feasibility of addition of leucovorin (LV) to S-1 and gemcitabine therapy in advanced pancreatic cancer. The aim of this phase II trial was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine, S-1 and LV (GSL) combination therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer. Methods Chemotherapy-naïve patients with histologically or cytologically proven advanced pancreatic cancer were enrolled. Gemcitabine was administered at a dose of 1000 mg/m2 by 30 min infusion on days 1, S-1 40 mg/m2 orally twice daily and LV 25 mg orally twice daily on days 1 to 7 every 2 weeks. Primary end point was progression free survival (PFS). Results A total of 49 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (19 locally advanced and 30 metastatic) were enrolled. Overall response rate and disease control rate were 32.7% and 87.8%. The median PFS and overall survival (OS) were 10.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.4-13.5) and 20.7 (95% CI 13.0-NA) months with 1-year survival rate of 73.4%. Major Grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (22.4%) and stomatitis (14.3%). No toxicity related death was observed. Conclusions In this single center, phase II trial, gemcitabine, S-1 and LV combination therapy was tolerable and can potentially be a treatment option for advanced pancreatic cancer.

Early pancreatic stent placement in wire-guided biliary cannulation: A multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Guidewire insertion to a pancreatic duct under wire-guided cannulation (WGC) during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is associated with a high incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). Pancreatic stent placement followed by WGC (PS-WGC) is considered for these cases to reduce PEP. This study was aimed to examine the effectiveness of PS-WGC compared with repeated WGC. METHODS: The consecutive data of patients without history of ERCP who underwent ERCP for biliary intervention were retrospectively collected from five centers. Patients without guidewire insertion to the pancreatic duct were excluded. Pancreatic stent was immediately placed after guidewire insertion to the pancreatic duct in the PS-WGC group. The association between the method of biliary cannulation (PS-WGC or repeated WGC) and PEP was analyzed using multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS: A total of 590 patients (183 in the PS-WGC and 407 in the repeated WGC group) were included. PS-WGC decreased PEP (8.7% vs 19%, P = 0.001) and improved its severity (moderate and severe PEP; 2.2% vs 6.4%, P = 0.04) compared with repeated WGC. PS-WGC was associated with reduction of PEP in the multivariable model (Odds ratio 0.31, P < 0.001). The rates of difficult cannulation and overall successful biliary cannulation were not different between the two groups (66% vs 70%, P = 0.39 and 98% vs 96%, P = 0.21 in the PS-WGC and repeated WGC group, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatic stent placement followed by WGC reduced PEP in patients with guidewire insertion to the pancreatic duct during WGC for native papilla compared with repeated WGC.

Antireflux covered metal stent for nonresectable distal malignant biliary obstruction: Multicenter randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: An antireflux metal stent (ARMS) for nonresectable distal malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) may prevent recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) as a result of duodenobiliary reflux and prolong time to RBO (TRBO). Superiority of ARMS over conventional covered self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) has not been fully examined. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter randomized controlled trial to examine whether TRBO of an ARMS with a funnel-shaped valve was longer than that of a covered SEMS in SEMS-naïve patients. We enrolled 104 patients (52 patients per arm) at 11 hospitals in Japan. Secondary outcomes included causes of RBO, adverse events, and patient survival. RESULTS: TRBO did not differ significantly between the ARMS and covered SEMS groups (median, 251 vs 351 days, respectively; P = 0.11). RBO as a result of biliary sludge or food impaction was observed in 13% and 9.8% of patients who received an ARMS and covered SEMS, respectively (P = 0.83). ARMS was associated with a higher rate of stent migration compared with the covered SEMS (31% vs 12%, P = 0.038). Overall rates of adverse events were 20% and 18% in the ARMS and covered SEMS groups, respectively (P = 0.97). No significant between-group difference in patient survival was observed (P = 0.26). CONCLUSIONS: The current ARMS was not associated with longer TRBO compared with the covered SEMS. Modifications including addition of an anti-migration system are required to use the current ARMS as first-line palliative treatment of distal MBO (UMIN-CTR clinical trial registration number: UMIN000014784).

Indications for endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided biliary intervention: Does EUS always come after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography?

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD), first reported as an alternative to percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), is increasingly reported as a primary procedure without failed ERCP. The present study aims to evaluate the outcomes of therapeutic biliary ERCP and to compare the safety and effectiveness of primary EUS-BD with those of ERCP, rescue EUS-BD and PTBD. METHODS: We retrospectively studied therapeutic biliary ERCP as well as subsequent rescue PTBD and EUS-BD. Additionally, indications, safety and technical success of primary EUS-BD were evaluated. RESULTS: Between August 2013 and September 2015, a total of 520 therapeutic biliary ERCP with a native papilla were analyzed. We encountered 23 cases with inaccessible papilla and 22 cases with failed cannulation, which were rescued by 21 PTBD, 16 EUS-BD and two repeat ERCP. Additionally, 40 primary EUS-BD were carried out during the same period as a result of 10 recurrent cholangitis cases after transpapillary drainage, five outside failed cannulation, four altered anatomy, two history of ERCP-related adverse events (AE), two technical difficulties in stenting under enteroscopy-assisted ERCP and 17 on study protocol. Technical success and AE rates were 95.6% and 14.5% in ERCP, 90.5% and 33.3% in rescue PTBD, 93.8% and 18.8% in rescue EUS-BD, and 95.0% and 22.5% in primary EUS-BD, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Rescue EUS-BD was used in 3.1% among all ERCP. Given the comparable technical success and AE rates of both primary and rescue EUS-BD, primary EUS-BD without failed ERCP can be a treatment option if it provides advantages over ERCP.

Intravenous and intraperitoneal paclitaxel with S-1 for treatment of refractory pancreatic cancer with malignant ascites.

UNLABELLED: Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenous and intraperitoneal paclitaxel (PTX) combined with S-1 for treatment of gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer with malignant ascites. Methods After the feasibility of this regimen was first confirmed in an interim analysis in 10 patients, a total of 35 patients were enrolled between April 2011 and December 2014. PTX was administered intravenously (50 mg/m(2)) and intraperitoneally (20 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 8, and 80 mg/m(2) S-1 was administered on days 1-14 every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), the objective tumor response, efficacy against malignant ascites, and safety. Result In all 35 patients, the median OS and PFS were 4.8 (95 % confidence interval [CI], 2.1-5.3) months and 2.8 (95 % CI, 0.9-4.1) months, respectively. The 26 patients who were evaluable for efficacy achieved a response rate of 8 % and a disease control rate of 69 %. Malignant ascites had disappeared or decreased in 18 (69 %) patients, including complete resolution in 4 (15 %), and a negative change in cytological status was achieved in 8 (31 %) patients. The major grade 3/4 adverse events included neutropenia (34 %), anemia (31 %), nausea (9 %), and catheter-related infections (6 %). Conclusion Combination chemotherapy consisting of intravenous and intraperitoneal PTX with S-1 showed acceptable toxicity and favorable efficacy in pancreatic cancer patients with malignant ascites. ( CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000005306).

A pilot study of EUS-guided through-the-needle forceps biopsy (with video).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In EUS-guided FNA (EUS-FNA), small-caliber needles are preferable for optimal cytologic yield, whereas large ones are preferable when histologic specimens are needed. Because of the rigidity and friction induced by its large caliber, however, technical limitation does exist in a 19-gauge FNA needle. Recent development of miniature biopsy forceps enables EUS-guided through-the-needle forceps biopsy (EUS-TTNFB). The aim of this study is to evaluate safety and efficacy of EUS-TTNFB. METHODS: Eighteen sessions of EUS-TTNFB in 17 patients with solid lesions were performed by using a 0.75-mm biopsy forceps through a 19-gauge FNA needle. Technical feasibility, safety, and diagnostic yield of EUS-TTNFB were retrospectively studied. RESULTS: A total of 49 passes, a median of 3 passes per session, were performed, and the needle puncture, advancement and removal of the biopsy forceps, and subsequent EUS-FNA were technically successful in all patients. No adverse events were observed other than one case with hyperamylasemia without pancreatitis. Macroscopic histologic core by EUS-TTNFB was obtained at a rate of 71% per pass. The tissue acquisition rate by EUS-TTNFB alone was 67% per pass and 100% per session. When EUS-TTNFB and subsequent EUS-FNA were combined, the tissue acquisition rate was 94% per pass. The accuracy of combined EUS-TTNFB and EUS-FNA to diagnose malignancy was 88% per pass and 94% per session. With a single pass of EUS-TTNFB and EUS-FNA, the tissue acquisition rate was 89%, and the accuracy to diagnose malignancy was 83%. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-TTNFB was safe and technically feasible and provided additional tissue acquisition with a single puncture of a 19-gauge FNA needle.

Randomized trial comparing a side-port needle and standard needle for EUS-guided histology of pancreatic lesions.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: A side-port needle has been developed to improve diagnostic accuracy by obtaining more cellular material during EUS-guided FNA (EUS-FNA). We compared the accuracy rate of histology and the quality of histologic specimens from 22-gauge (G) side-port and standard needles for EUS-FNA of a solid pancreatic mass in a multicenter, prospective, randomized control trial. METHODS: Between January 2013 and September 2013, 160 consecutive patients with a suspected solid pancreatic mass at 5 tertiary referral centers were enrolled. Patients were randomized to the 22G side-port needle or 22G standard needle group. The primary endpoint was the diagnostic accuracy of histology. Secondary endpoints were the quality of the histologic specimen (quantity of tissue, degree of GI contamination, and amount of blood). RESULTS: An analysis of 154 patients (side-port, 76, vs standard, 78) was performed. Six patients were excluded because of no pancreatic mass on EUS. There was no significant difference in the rate of diagnostic accuracy of histology (side-port, 87% [66/76], vs standard, 82% [64/78]; P = .51). Samples that enabled histologic interpretation were obtained in 64% (47/73) and 43% (33/77) of patients from the side-port and standard groups, respectively (P = .009). No significant difference was seen in the degree of GI contamination and amount of blood between groups. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in the accuracy rate of histology between needle types. The side-port needle was superior to the standard needle in terms of obtaining samples that enabled histologic interpretation.

Safety and effectiveness of a long, partially covered metal stent for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy in patients with malignant biliary obstruction.

Background and study aims: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) is potentially complicated by bile leak and stent migration. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a long (≥ 10 cm), partially covered metal stent (LP-CMS) for EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) for malignant biliary obstruction. Both the stent length and the uncovered portion at the proximal end of the LP-CMS are designed to prevent stent migration. Patients and methods: A total of 33 patients undergoing EUS-HGS using an LP-CMS in four centers were retrospectively studied. Technical and clinical success, adverse events, and recurrent biliary obstruction were evaluated. Results: Gastric outlet obstruction (76 %) and surgically altered anatomy (15 %) were two major reasons for EUS-HGS. The technical and clinical success rates were 100 %. The median intragastric stent length was 54 mm. The adverse event rate was 9 %. No stent migration was observed. Recurrent biliary obstruction developed in 24 %, with a median cumulative time to recurrence of 8.5 months. Conclusions: EUS-HGS using an LP-CMS for unresectable malignant biliary obstruction was safe and effective.

Outcome of Long-term Maintenance Steroid Therapy Cessation in Patients With Autoimmune Pancreatitis: A Prospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: To predict the duration of steroid maintenance therapy required to achieve good prognosis in patients with autoimmune pancreatitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study sample comprised 21 patients with autoimmune pancreatitis who met the following criteria: (1) they received steroid therapy (ST) for at least 3 years without clinical relapse; and (2) immunoglobulin (Ig) G<1600 mg/dL was observed in the past year with a prednisolone maintenance dose ≤5 mg. All patients could be diagnosed with international consensus diagnostic criteria. Patients were prospectively followed up after tapering and cessation of steroids. Clinical relapse was defined as the need to resume ST. Serological relapse was defined as having an IgG level of >1600 mg/dL. RESULTS: During the 43-month (range, 19 to 48 mo) follow-up period, clinical relapse occurred in 10 patients: pancreatic lesion in 4; coronary lesion in 2; submandibular lesion in 1; both pulmonary and renal lesions in 1; pulmonary, retroperitoneal, and submandibular lesions in 1; and bronchial asthma in 1. Serological relapse was observed in 12 patients. Although clinical and serological relapse occurred concomitantly in 3 patients, serological relapse preceded clinical relapse in 4 patients. Five patients experienced serological relapse alone, and no clinical or serological relapse occurred in 6 patients. According to Cox proportional hazard analysis, the duration of ST before tapering was a significant predictive parameter (hazard ratio, 0.969/month; 95% confidence interval, 0.940-0.998; P=0.038). CONCLUSIONS: ST cessation resulted in a high rate of clinical relapses, even in patients with long-term maintenance therapy. Therefore, it appears desirable to continue steroid maintenance therapy for a period >3 years to prevent relapse.

Cholecystectomy after endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for bile duct stones reduced late biliary complications: a propensity score-based cohort analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones with concomitant gallstones is known to reduce late biliary complications. Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for bile duct stones develops fewer late biliary complications than endoscopic sphincterotomy, but no randomized controlled trials have been conducted about the role of cholecystectomy after endoscopic papillary balloon dilation. Therefore, we conducted this propensity score-matched analysis to compare cholecystectomy and wait-and-see approach after endoscopic papillary balloon dilation. METHODS: Propensity score matching extracted 147 pairs of patients with cholecystectomy after endoscopic papillary balloon dilation and with gallbladder left in situ with stones (wait-and-see) from 725 patients who underwent endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for bile duct stones. Late biliary complications such as recurrent bile duct stones and cholecystitis were evaluated. Cumulative incidence of late biliary complications was calculated treating death without biliary complications as a competing risk, and its prognostic factor was evaluated. RESULTS: The rates of late biliary complications were 5.4 and 25.2 % in the cholecystectomy after endoscopic papillary balloon dilation and wait-and-see groups: Recurrent bile duct stones rates were 4.1 and 19.0 %, and cholecystitis rates were 0.7 and 6.1 %. The cumulative incidences of biliary complications in the cholecystectomy after endoscopic papillary balloon dilation and wait-and-see approach were 3.1 versus 13.0 % at 1 year and 5.7 versus 28.0 % at 5 year after endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (p = 0.008). Subdistribution hazard ratio of late biliary complications in the wait-and-see group was 5.1 (p = 0.020). CONCLUSION: Cholecystectomy after endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for choledocholithiasis was associated with fewer late biliary complications. Prophylactic cholecystectomy should be offered to all surgically fit patients after endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for bile duct stones with concomitant gallstones.

Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis in wire-guided cannulation for therapeutic biliary ERCP.

BACKGROUND: Wire-guided cannulation (WGC) was reported to decrease post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), but risk factors for PEP in WGC are not fully elucidated. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence and risk factors of PEP in WGC. DESIGN: Single-center retrospective study. SETTING: Academic center. PATIENTS: A total of 800 consecutive patients with a native papilla. INTERVENTIONS: Biliary therapeutic ERCP by using WGC. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The rate of PEP and its risk factors. RESULTS: Biliary cannulation was successful by using WGC alone in 70.5%, and the final cannulation rate was 96.1%. Unintentional guidewire insertion and contrast material injection into the pancreatic duct (PD) during cannulation occurred in 55.3% and 21.8%, respectively. The incidence of PEP was 9.5% (mild 5.6%, moderate 2.9%, severe 1.0%). Multivariate analysis revealed a common bile duct (CBD) diameter of <9 mm (odds ratio [OR] 2.03; P = .006) and unintentional guidewire insertion into the PD (OR 2.25; P = .014) as risk factors for PEP. PD opacification was not a risk factor for PEP (OR 1.15; P = .642), but the incremental increase of the PEP rate was seen in patients with CBDs <9 mm: 4.6% without any PD manipulation, 8.3% with contrast material alone, 16.9% with guidewire alone, and 22.1% with both contrast material and guidewire. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective design in a single center. CONCLUSION: Unintentional PD manipulation was not uncommon in WGC. Guidewire insertion into the PD and a small CBD were risk factors for PEP in biliary therapeutic ERCP with the use of WGC.

Effect of a stylet on a histological specimen in EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition by using 22-gauge needles: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: EUS-guided FNA (EUS-FNA) has become the most efficacious way to obtain specimens from a solid lesion adjacent to the GI tract. Previous reports regarding the use of a stylet during EUS-FNA were all based on cytological diagnosis and have showed no significant superiority in terms of diagnostic yield. OBJECTIVE: To clarify the noninferiority of EUS-FNA without a stylet (S-) compared with EUS-FNA with a stylet (S+) on histological assessment. DESIGN: A prospective, single-blind, randomized, controlled crossover study. SETTING: Five tertiary referral centers in Japan. PATIENTS: Patients referred for EUS-FNA of a solid lesion. INTERVENTION: EUS-FNA S+ and S- in a total of 4 alternate passes with randomization to S+ first or S- first. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The primary endpoint was the acquisition rate of an appropriate and sufficient specimen for histological assessment. The secondary endpoints were cellularity, contamination, bloodiness, diagnostic ability, and diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: We enrolled 107 patients (110 lesions) and analyzed 220 specimens each in the S+ and S- groups. The acquisition rate of appropriate and sufficient specimens in the S+ group was 121 of 220 (55.0%) and 122 of 220 (55.5%) in the S- group. The difference in the acquisition rate of the specimen (S- minus S+) based on the generalized estimating equation was 0.42% (95% confidence interval, -6.72% to 7.56%), which was less than 10% of the prespecified noninferiority margin of this study. With regard to cellularity, contamination, bloodiness score, diagnostic ability, and diagnostic accuracy, there were no significant differences between both groups. There were no dropouts in the study. LIMITATIONS: A variety of target lesions, multiple pathologists, lack of an assessment of intraobserver and interobserver variability, and a single-blind study for the pathologists. CONCLUSION: EUS-FNA S- is noninferior to EUS-FNA S+ on histological assessment. ( CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000008695.).

Clinical outcomes of secondary gastroduodenal self-expandable metallic stent placement by stent-in-stent technique for malignant gastric outlet obstruction.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of secondary gastroduodenal stent placement after first stent dysfunction for malignant gastric outlet obstruction. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of secondary stent-in-stent gastroduodenal stent placement. RESULTS: Among 260 patients who had been treated with first gastroduodenal stent placement for malignant gastric outlet obstruction, 29 patients (11.2%) were treated with secondary gastroduodenal stent placement because of first stent dysfunction. Pancreatic cancer was the major primary cancer (55.2%). A WallFlex duodenal stent was the most frequently inserted stent both as a first stent (75.9%) and as a secondary stent (62.1%). There were 22 patients (75.9%) that received gastroduodenal stents at the bending site (supraduodenal angle or infraduodenal angle). Technical and clinical success rates were 100% and 86.2%, respectively. Median eating period was 3.0 months, and median survival time was 3.5 months. As for related complications, gastrointestinal perforation, insufficient stent expansion, tumor ingrowth, tumor overgrowth, and cholangitis were experienced in 13.8% (four cases), 6.9% (two cases), 6.9% (two cases), 3.4% (one case), and 3.4% (one case), respectively. CONCLUSION: Secondary gastroduodenal stent placement might be effective for managing first stent dysfunction in malignant gastric outlet obstruction. However, gastrointestinal perforation was the major complication.

Disease-specific mortality among patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas is associated with synchronous and metachronous pancreatic cancer. However, the risk factors for pancreatic cancer-specific mortality have not been determined. We evaluated disease-specific mortality among patients with IPMNs harboring high-risk stigmata. METHODS: We analyzed data from 243 patients diagnosed with IPMN, with indications for surgery according to the consensus criteria, at the University of Tokyo Hospital from 1995 to January 2011. By using optimal matching and propensity scores based on 16 characteristics, we matched patients who underwent surgery at diagnosis with those who did not undergo surgery. A competing risk analysis was used to assess the risk of pancreatic cancer-specific mortality. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients underwent surgery after diagnosis and 184 did not. After adjustment with propensity scores, detection of a hypo-attenuating area by computed tomography, which indicates invasive carcinoma, was associated significantly with pancreatic cancer-specific mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 16.75; 95% confidence interval, 2.72-103.3; P = .002). Cyst diameter, main pancreatic duct diameter, and the presence of a mural nodule were not associated significantly with pancreatic cancer-specific mortality. Surgical management was found to reduce pancreatic cancer-specific mortality, especially in patients with hypo-attenuating areas (P = .038). CONCLUSIONS: Detection of a hypo-attenuating area by computed tomography significantly increases the risk for pancreatic cancer-specific mortality among IPMN patients with consensus indications for surgery. Surgical resection significantly reduces this risk.

Detection of painless pancreatitis by computed tomography in patients with post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography hyperamylasemia.

OBJECTIVES: Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis is diagnosed on the basis of pancreatic pain and hyperamylasemia. However, because the diagnosis of abdominal pain is not objective, there may be some cases of painless pancreatitis among patients with post-ERCP hyperamylasemia (PEH). We reviewed the computed tomography (CT) findings of PEH cases to determine the incidence of painless pancreatitis. METHODS: Between July, 2005 and December, 2011, CT was performed in 91 patients with hyperamylasemia 18 h after ERCP. We reviewed the CT findings and graded the severity of pancreatitis according to the Balthazar grading system. Grades C, D, and E were defined as pancreatitis. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients (37%) had pancreatitis according to the CT findings. There was a significant difference in the serum amylase levels between the positive- and negative-CT finding groups (1306 ± 833 vs. 786 ± 315 IU/L, respectively; p = 0.0012). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the amylase cut-off value for discriminating between the 2 groups was 795 IU/L (6.36 times the upper normal limit). CONCLUSIONS: Thirty-seven percent of PEH patients had painless pancreatitis. CT is useful to determine pancreatitis in patients taking analgesics, steroids, or anti-immunological drugs and those with diabetes mellitus and 18-h serum amylase levels of >6 times the normal upper limit.

Short- and long-term outcomes of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation with or without sphincterotomy for removal of large bile duct stones.

OBJECTIVE: Removal of large bile duct stones by endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) with endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) has been proven safe and effective. Little evidence supports the benefits of a preceding EST in reducing complications. Recent studies suggest that large bile duct stone removal by EPLBD alone may be safe and effective. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We removed large bile duct stones by EPLBD with EST from March 2008 to February 2010 and without EST from March 2010 to October 2011. Efficacy and safety of EPLBD with or without EST and late biliary complication outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Forty-two patients (men/women, 27/15; mean age, 76 years) underwent EPLBD: 14 underwent EPLBD with EST and 28 underwent EPLBD without EST. The mean stone size was 14 mm (9-30 mm). Overall complete stone removal rate was 98%, with 83% achieved in 1 session. Complete duct clearance by EPLBD alone was achieved in 79%. Mechanical lithotripsy was required in 4 (10%) patients. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and electrohydraulic lithotripsy were required in 4 (10%) and 1 (2%) patients, respectively. Pancreatitis and perforation occurred in 2 (5%) and 1 (2%) patients, respectively. Patients treated by EPLBD with EST and by EPLBD alone did not differ in complication outcomes. Six (14%) patients had recurrent bile duct stones, with a significant correlation to dilated common bile duct (p = 0.0351). CONCLUSIONS: EPLBD is safe and effective in patients with large bile duct stones. Preceding EST may be unnecessary.

Risk factors for covered metallic stent migration in patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction due to pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Covered metallic stents (CMSs) were developed to overcome tumor ingrowth in uncovered metallic stents (UMSs) for malignant biliary obstruction, but superiority of CMSs over UMSs is still controversial due to the high migration rate in CMS. Therefore, we conducted this retrospective analysis to clarify risk factors for stent migration, including mechanical properties of CMSs. METHODS: Patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer, receiving CMS for distal malignant biliary obstruction in five tertiary care centers, were retrospectively studied. Univariate and multivariate analyses to identify prognostic factors for early (< 6 months) stent migration were performed using a proportional hazards model with death or stent occlusion without stent migration as a competing risk. Two mechanical properties were included in the analysis: axial force, the recovery force that leads to a CMS straightening, and radial force (RF), the expansion force against the stricture. RESULTS: Among 290 patients who received CMS placement for distal malignant biliary obstruction, stent migration rate was 15.2%. CMS migrated early (< 6 months) in 10.0% and distally in 11.7%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, significant risk factors for early stent migration were chemotherapy (subdistribution hazard ratios [SHR] 4.46, P = 0.01), CMS with low RF (SHR 2.23, P = 0.03), and duodenal invasion (SHR 2.25, P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: CMS with low RF, chemotherapy, and duodenal invasion were associated with CMS migration from our study.

Metallic stent with high axial force as a risk factor for cholecystitis in distal malignant biliary obstruction.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Tumor involvement to the orifice of cystic duct (OCD) is a risk factor for cholecystitis after self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement, but its prevention is still difficult. We conducted this multicenter analysis to clarify a type of SEMS or a method to place SEMS which would decrease the incidence of cholecystitis after SEMS placement. METHODS: The incidence of cholecystitis was studied in consecutive patients receiving SEMS for distal malignant biliary obstruction in five tertiary care centers. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate risk factors for cholecystitis. RESULTS: A total of 376 patients who received SEMS placement for distal malignant biliary obstruction were analyzed. Tumor involvement to OCD was diagnosed in 25.3%. Overall incidence of cholecystitis was 6.9%. Cholecystitis was observed in 8.0% of 300 patients with covered SEMS, 16.8% of 95 patients with tumor involvement to OCD, 10.8% of 234 patients with SEMS of high axial force (AF), and 12.0% of 158 patients with SEMS length ≤ 60 mm. In the multivariate analysis, tumor involvement to OCD (odds ratio [OR] 5.40, P < 0.001), SEMSs with high AF (OR 5.33, P = 0.002), and SEMS length ≤ 60 mm (OR 3.19, P = 0.010) are risk factors. Among patients with tumor involvement to OCD, the incidence of cholecystitis in SEMS with high and low AF was 25.0% and 5.0%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study with an expanded cohort reconfirmed tumor involvement to OCD as a risk factor for cholecystitis after SEMS placement. SEMS with low AF might decrease cholecystitis.