RESUMEN
eIF5B and eIF1A are two translation-initiation factors that are universally conserved among all kingdoms. They show a unique interaction in eukaryotes which is important for ribosomal subunit joining. Here, the structures of two isolated forms of yeast eIF5B and of the eIF5B-eIF1A complex (eIF1A and eIF5B do not contain the respective N-terminal domains) are reported. The eIF5B-eIF1A structure shows that the C-terminal tail of eIF1A binds to eIF5B domain IV, while the core domain of eIF1A is invisible in the electron-density map. Although the individual domains in all structures of eIF5B or archaeal IF5B (aIF5B) are similar, their domain arrangements are significantly different, indicating high structural flexibility, which is advantageous for conformational change during ribosomal subunit joining. Based on these structures, models of eIF5B, eIF1A and tRNAi(Met) on the 80S ribosome were built. The models suggest that the interaction between the eIF1A C-terminal tail and eIF5B helps tRNAi(Met) to bind to eIF5B domain IV, thus preventing tRNAi(Met) dissociation, stabilizing the interface for subunit joining and providing a checkpoint for correct ribosome assembly.
Asunto(s)
Factor 1 Eucariótico de Iniciación/química , Factores Eucarióticos de Iniciación/química , Proteínas de Saccharomyces cerevisiae/química , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/química , Cristalografía por Rayos X , Factor 1 Eucariótico de Iniciación/metabolismo , Factores Eucarióticos de Iniciación/metabolismo , Modelos Moleculares , Conformación Proteica , Ribosomas/química , Ribosomas/metabolismo , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/metabolismo , Proteínas de Saccharomyces cerevisiae/metabolismoRESUMEN
The binding between two universally conserved translation initiation factors, eIF5B and eIF1A, is important in the initiation step of eukaryotic protein synthesis on the ribosome. Through this interaction, eIF1A assists in recruiting eIF5B to the initiating 40S subunit; eIF5B then encourages the joining of the 60S subunit to form an initiating 80S ribosome. Here, the expression, purification, crystallization and preliminary X-ray analyses of eIF5BΔN and the eIF5BΔN-eIF1AΔN complex from Saccharomyces cerevisiae are reported. The crystal of eIF5BΔN diffracted to 2.45â Å resolution and belonged to space group P4(1)2(1)2, with unit-cell parameters a = b = 130.0, c = 71.7â Å. The asymmetric unit was estimated to contain one molecule. The initial phase was obtained by Se-SAD. The crystal of the eIF5BΔN-eIF1AΔN complex diffracted to 3.3â Å resolution and belonged to space group P2(1)2(1)2(1), with unit-cell parameters a = 101.9, b = 120.9, c = 132.8â Å. The asymmetric unit was estimated to contain two complex molecules.
Asunto(s)
Factor 1 Eucariótico de Iniciación/química , Factores Eucarióticos de Iniciación/química , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/química , Cristalización , Cristalografía por Rayos X , Factor 1 Eucariótico de Iniciación/metabolismo , Factores Eucarióticos de Iniciación/metabolismo , Unión Proteica , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/metabolismoRESUMEN
A validation study was performed on a multiresidue method for determination of pesticide residues in agricultural products according to the method validation guideline of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan. FASRAC (Food Automatic Analytical Systems for Residual Agricultural Chemicals) automatically performs extraction of pesticide residues from agricultural products with acetonitrile, filtration, constant volume, mixing with the use of air, mixing acetonitrile with buffer solvent, separation, and dehydration with sodium sulfate. The extract was purified with a GC/NH2 column. For wheat flour and soybeans, a purification step with a C18 column was added before a GC/NH2 column. After removal of the solvent, the extract was resolved in n-hexane/acetone solvent for GC-MS/MS analysis. In the case of manual analysis, pesticide residues were analyzed according to official multiresidue methods and purification steps were the same as in FASRAC. Recovery tests were performed with wheat flour, soybeans, spinach and apples, by addition of 302 pesticides at the concentrations 0.01 mg/kg. The results indicate that automatic extraction using FASRAC is superior to manual analysis in trueness, repeatability and within-run reproducibility. Specially, automatic extraction using FASRAC is superior to manual analysis in trueness because it is optimized in various respects, for example reextraction at salting-out.